GDT: HFBoards GDT | 02/09/2015

[Stad]

Feed froze for me soon as Sharp was about to shoot lol

 

[The Zetterberg Era]

I don't think I've ever heard a ref say it's inconclusive. I think they don't want to admit they can't tell.

I can think of it happening a couple times, but you're right it is extremely rare for them to go with that language when they do make the announcement.

 

[1989]

Such a close call on that OT non-winner. If the referee had called it a goal on the ice, it would have stood as such - it was really just that close.

In my opinion, it was in - and I had vCash riding on the Coyotes to win.

Coyotes take it in the shootout.

 

[zytz]

anyone have a gif? can't get a feed where I am currentlu

 

[CarpeNoctem]

Such a close call on that OT non-winner. If the referee had called it a goal on the ice, it would have stood as such - it was really just that close.

In my opinion, it was in - and I had vCash riding on the Coyotes to win.

Coyotes take it in the shootout.

I agree and I'm still pretty confident that it was in, but they seem to use different standards of review on those calls, depending which team of refs is doing the deciding.

 

[Blueline Bomber]

Every replay they showed on NBCSN had the puck still touching the line. Barely, but it was there.

 

[LetsGoBLUES91]

Every replay they showed on NBCSN had the puck still touching the line. Barely, but it was there.

Exactly. No idea how it stayed out but it stayed out. And where do Chicago fans get off on complaining about calls/no-calls?

 

[Shepard]

I think that was the right call based on the view we had. Maybe it was in right before Smith reached it, but Smith and Michalek's sticks went over the puck at the first frame where it may have fully crossed the line, so they couldn't have overruled the no goal call.

I fully support the tank, so this isn't me being a homer. :p

 

[Marc the Habs Fan]

2-0 Flames in SJ.

 

[Danish Pastry]

Sharks flames where exciting hockey goes to die...

 

[State of Hockey]

Every replay they showed on NBCSN had the puck still touching the line. Barely, but it was there.

One thing that makes it tough is that the camera is slightly behind the goal line to avoid the crossbar. So with the angle it can show a puck over the line to be slightly on it if it's not laying flat. This one was so close that a simple difference in angle can make the difference.

 

[Marc the Habs Fan]

Burns scores with a second left in the 2nd.

 

[Danish Pastry]

Too bad the sharks play the flames like they have a stick up their arse...

 

[1989]

Flames sweep the season series against the Sharks with the *highly probable* win tonight. (Posting with 1:30 left to go in the game and 4-1 Flames.)

 

[Paper]

Flames, Ducks and Sharks got a rock-paper-scissor thing going.


Flames>Sharks>Ducks>Flames

 

[Quid Pro Clowe]

Flames sweep the season series against the Sharks with the *highly probable* win tonight. (Posting with 1:30 left to go in the game and 4-1 Flames.)

Sharks have beaten Calgary this season.

 

[1989]

Flames, Ducks and Sharks got a rock-paper-scissor thing going.


Flames>Sharks>Ducks>Flames

The Flames can beat the Ducks, just not in Anaheim... which could be a bit of a problem in the playoffs.

Sharks have beaten Calgary this season.

My bad. But 4/5 ain't bad.