Nephasted
Registered User
- Jan 29, 2018
- 69
- 36
HF Habs: HF Habs: 2024 Habs Final Prospect rankings
- Thread starter Treb
- Start date
If you redo the ranking as at today, would you change anything from our final rankings ?
I'd move down Farrell, and move Tuch up. And maybe swap Roy and Fowler position.
1. Ivan Demidov, 96.9% (N/A)
2. Lane Hutson, 51.5% (-1)
3. David Reinbacher, 90.4% (-1)
4. Logan Mailloux, 37.3% (-1)
5. Michael Hage, 47.3% (N/A)
6. Joshua Roy, 55.1% (-2)
7. Jacob Fowler, 56.2% (+4)
8. Owen Beck, 84.0% (-2)
9. Adam Engstrom, 49.1% (-4)
10. Oliver Kapanen, 43.6% (+4)
11. Florian Xhekaj, 35.5% (+14)
12. Filip Mesar, 43.3% (-3)
13. Bogdan Konyushkov, 52.1% (+5)
14. Jakub Dobes, 39.9% (-4)
15. Yevgeni Volokhin, 31.1% (+13)
16. Emil Heineman, 36.6% (-9)
17. Sean Farrell, 39.2% (-9)
18. Filip Eriksson, 40.9% (+12)
19. Aatos Koivu, 47.2% (N/A)
20. Luke Tuch, 53.1% (-3)
21. Vincenz Rohrer, 35.6% (-2)
22. Riley Kidney, 31.6% (-10)
23. Jared Davidson, 33.3% (-3)
24. Logan Sawyer, 63.8% (NA)
25. William Trudeau, 32.4% (-10)
26. Owen Protz, 40.8% (NA)
27. Tyler Thorpe, 51.3% (NA)
28. Quentin Miller, 35.6% (-2)
29. Sam Harris, 42.7% (+8)
30. Xavier Simoneau, 51.5% (-9)
If Demidov isn't as great as advertised, then our offence will be doomed for years.
I'd move down Farrell, and move Tuch up. And maybe swap Roy and Fowler position.
1. Ivan Demidov, 96.9% (N/A)
2. Lane Hutson, 51.5% (-1)
3. David Reinbacher, 90.4% (-1)
4. Logan Mailloux, 37.3% (-1)
5. Michael Hage, 47.3% (N/A)
6. Joshua Roy, 55.1% (-2)
7. Jacob Fowler, 56.2% (+4)
8. Owen Beck, 84.0% (-2)
9. Adam Engstrom, 49.1% (-4)
10. Oliver Kapanen, 43.6% (+4)
11. Florian Xhekaj, 35.5% (+14)
12. Filip Mesar, 43.3% (-3)
13. Bogdan Konyushkov, 52.1% (+5)
14. Jakub Dobes, 39.9% (-4)
15. Yevgeni Volokhin, 31.1% (+13)
16. Emil Heineman, 36.6% (-9)
17. Sean Farrell, 39.2% (-9)
18. Filip Eriksson, 40.9% (+12)
19. Aatos Koivu, 47.2% (N/A)
20. Luke Tuch, 53.1% (-3)
21. Vincenz Rohrer, 35.6% (-2)
22. Riley Kidney, 31.6% (-10)
23. Jared Davidson, 33.3% (-3)
24. Logan Sawyer, 63.8% (NA)
25. William Trudeau, 32.4% (-10)
26. Owen Protz, 40.8% (NA)
27. Tyler Thorpe, 51.3% (NA)
28. Quentin Miller, 35.6% (-2)
29. Sam Harris, 42.7% (+8)
30. Xavier Simoneau, 51.5% (-9)
If Demidov isn't as great as advertised, then our offence will be doomed for years.
HuGort
Registered User
Beck I would move up. Where center who can win faceoffs and play all three zones. He's having good year.
Mrb1p
PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
I think knowing what we know... we'd be forced to move down Demidov a spot. Which is f***ing insane. Pardon my Japanese .
I think what Demidov is doing in his limited minutes in the KHL is mightily impressive as well. I'd still keep him #1, but the gap between the 2 would be a lot smaller. The gap between #2 and #3 would be bigger.
Ezpz
No mad pls
- Apr 16, 2013
- 15,308
- 11,809
Probably everything from 3-30 changes. Just simple things like Harris or heinemen climbing and Eriksson or xhekaj falling back down.
That top ten is really tight but there would definitely be movement. Reinbacher falls just for being injured.
Mrb1p
PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Of course it is. It's still not "being pretty much a number 1D in the NHL at 20 years old" impressive
26Mats
Registered User
- Jun 23, 2018
- 33,376
- 25,770
- Hage ahead of Mailloux
- Fowler ahead of Roy and Mailloux, hot on Hage's heals
- Beck seriously challenging Roy - for the first time for me I have him a hair ahead of Roy.
- Kapanen ahead of Engstrom, and getting closer to Roy and Beck.
- Heineman right behind Kapanen, and Tuch right behind Heineman, as far forwards go. But then Dobes has to move up, so...I'll just wait till season endings do re do the rankings with even more info....
bishop12
Ovyously
- Dec 1, 2006
- 8,280
- 409
WeThreeKings
Demidov is a HAB
32/32 GMs would take Reinbacher over Mailloux.
With the DR injury maybe not, but Reinbacher as a way better IQ hockey and will be a non flashy really good 2 way defensman.
Mailloux is a beast, but even if he racks points he is really bad in his zone. I guess he can fix it but sometime he really looks like he's lost as f***. He should use his reach and size way more.
If im a GM and want to start a team David Reinbacher his the obvious choice. Really hope that this year dont slow his development too much.
Mrb1p
PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Talent wise Mailloux dont have to be jealous of Reinbacher. The biggest difference is that David is a hockey player (high IQ) and Mailloux is an athlete (lots of tools but lack of hockey sense)
Reinbacher play the game the right way. Always choosing the safest play to be efficient.
Mailloux in the other end try high risk play. Less effective but more prone to rack points.
I love both of them, but they are not in the same league foreal
Reinbacher play the game the right way. Always choosing the safest play to be efficient.
Mailloux in the other end try high risk play. Less effective but more prone to rack points.
I love both of them, but they are not in the same league foreal
Mrb1p
PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
That's underrating Reinbacher. He was a top 5 pick for a reason.
And no, DR doesn't always choose the safe play, when he's at his best, he pushes the play in ways Mailloux has never done
Actually maybe im not expressing myself clearly since im not anglophone but what im trying to said his if you looks only on their tools box Mailloux as some edge over Reinbacher on certain skills
Mailloux has a better shots
More physical
Skating wise pretty similar
But the biggest difference and its really huge its the way they understand and play the game.
Markov has been a top 10 defensman for 10 years mostly because he was super intelligent. He was pretty slow, not the biggest, but he didnt need it because he was smart as f***.
Hockey IQ is the biggest quality for a player and you cannot learn it. The rest of the skills you can work on it.
Dont know if its make more sense
