UnSandvich
Registered User
- Sep 7, 2017
- 5,885
- 9,023
I know it's already been said in this thread, but if the tix for the jersey retirement game aren't in the 4 figures, i'm going. No if's, and's, or but's. period.
I know it's already been said in this thread, but if the tix for the jersey retirement game aren't in the 4 figures, i'm going. No if's, and's, or but's. period.
If they make a true highlight reel of his career they will have to start the ceremony at 2PM if the game has to start @7PM.The crazy thing about this highlight reel is that there's nothing on it from the first 7 or so years of his career.
One of the greatest Rangers ever and we got to witness him.
I'm very happy and lucky to have watched him. Certainly made the 1AM game starts worth it.
The aspect of hockey that fascinates me most is goaltending and Hank made NYR fandom an awesome/sufferable experience. He gave us dozens of all time saves!
Most memorable to me the Montreal one, also that crazy Columbus game, where he had like three-four insane desperation stops.
I also watched one of his greatest games, I'd argue most NA fans don't pay much attention to. It certainly feels underrated to me around here.
The 2006 Olympics finals. Go watch the last 5 minutes.
Everything else has been said.
Thank you Henrik and long live the King!
jesus. i remember grabbing a Richter single ticket for like $80.
I had season tickets for Graves, Mess, and Leetch, so i don't know what they were going for.
Anyone remember this save form the 2005-06 season During his rookie year. It something I’ve always remembered regardless how young I was at that point….
my tweet btw
Best Rangers goalie that I’ve seen. That includes Giacomin and Richter. Selfish on my part but I didn’t want to see him playing for another team.
Man stop you're making me scared of getting oldBeing the long time fan of a particular team gives you a strange and compressed view of life. It's almost as if we live in "dog years." We see players come up as kids, develop into young stars, young vets, vets, and eventually become "old" in their mid and late thirties. And then they retire.
It seems like just yesterday that I remember J.D. telling Sam Rosen about this young goalie in Sweden who had the potential to be really special. And here we are, all those years later paying homage to an all-time great, future HOFer.
But then, I remember Eddie Giacomin's first game, as well as Brad Parks and Brian Leetches. I remember when they called up a young Rod Gilbert for the playoffs in 1962.
As Ranger fans, we have a long and illustrious tradition of great goaltending: Gumper to Eddie to JD, to Beezer, to Mike, to Henrik. I will always have special affection for Giacomin, who as there when we first became a powerhouse team during the Francis era, and for Richter, who after all won us a Cup. But looking at it objectively, Henrik was simply the best of all of them, not only on the ice but in his off-ice persona. For me, he symbolized the greatness of NYC, an "immigrant" if you will, who embraced the city, internalized it, and made it his own. In turn, the city loved him back.
It still seems strange not to have him around. For all those years he was the heart and soul of the team. Simply the best.
Man stop you're making me scared of getting oldto me Henriks rookie season seems like FOREVER ago I was a little kid
I think Tretiak was better than Hasek.Totally agree.
I'll take it a step further.
Hasek is easily the best goalie I ever saw.
Hank is in the discussion for 2nd best I ever saw.
It does too quick. When Girardi retired it stung and hurt. This is hurt on steroids.This is probably hitting us younger guys harder as we're finally seeing the legends we looked up to as kids retiring![]()
Anyone remember this save form the 2005-06 season During his rookie year. It something I’ve always remembered regardless how young I was at that point….
my tweet btw
This is probably hitting us younger guys harder as we're finally seeing the legends we looked up to as kids retiring![]()
If I had to guess, tickets will likely be 1k+. In 2014, Stanley Cup tickets at MSG were at least 1k to get into the door. Lundqvist retiring will be seen in similar magnitude, where any Rangers fan would want to be there and even casual fans to see the special event.I know it's already been said in this thread, but if the tix for the jersey retirement game aren't in the 4 figures, i'm going. No if's, and's, or but's. period.
This mirrors my experience nearly to a tee. I stopped watching the Knicks in 2000 or 2001, and the Rangers about a year later. 05-06 I picked both teams back up. One team stunk, the other team stuck. I've been hooked on hockey ever since and I credit Hank. The best.I stopped watching the Rangers and Knicks around 98? when I was 10 years old. I picked hockey back up again in 2005 because of how much I loved watching the playoffs and trading for Jagr. Very happy I came back and got to see his whole career. Still one of the worst feelings is not getting Hank a Cup. He deserved way more.
He was lightning from post to post early in his career, so quick. Prime Henrik in terms of athleticism was a pleasure to watch every night. We all slept so soundly in 2005 knowing we'd have the King between to pipes for another decade or so. Just wish Sather built a few more contending teams with adept 5v5 offense and a working power-play.I forgot how acrobatic Hank was in his earlier years
I think Tretiak was better than Hasek.
It sucks that post Jagr the best offensive player the Rangers have had by far is Panarin and we didn't get him until Hank was past his prime and we were rebuilding. Adding in a Panarin or even a Panarin-lite, let alone a Fox and Zibanejad, to any of Hank's Rangers teams and we're probably looking back on his multiple Cups. It's actually amazing we got as close as we did considering how inept the offense was for the majority of his career. I mean in the 2012 playoffs I think we averaged 2.1 goals a game or something stupid like that. In 2014 when we went to the Final our leading scorer was a defenseman in McDonagh who only had 17 points in 25 games. And we had power plays that we would've been better off turning the power play down bc they were so awful. Just SLIGHTLY more offense and we for sure win at least 1 cup, hell, if Chicago beats LA in 2014 I'm convinced we win the Cup that year and we definitely win it in 2015 if Zucc was playing and McD, Staal, Girardi and Yandle all didn't have to play through major injuries. Horrible injury luck in 2015 and penalty luck in the 2014 final. Man, it sucks.He was lightning from post to post early in his career, so quick. Prime Henrik in terms of athleticism was a pleasure to watch every night. We all slept so soundly in 2005 knowing we'd have the King between to pipes for another decade or so. Just wish Sather built a few more contending teams with adept 5v5 offense and a working power-play.
I only saw Tretiak in 30 games or so, so it's difficult to agree or disagree.
One thing in favor of Hasek is that he spent most of his career in front of not very good teams while Tretiak played in front of one of the very best teams in hockey history.
Hasek had some good teams in Buffalo but not great ones. Similar to some of the better squads that Henrik had here with us. To me Henrik and Hasek had a lot in common as far as teams they played for and those teams tended to go as far as they could carry them.
Tretiak playing for the Red Army team always had some of the best other Russian players on his teams. Fetisov and Kasatonov were Russia’s best defensemen. Larionov, Makarov and Krutov was the best Soviet forward line. Red Army was almost always the best and deepest Russian team.