Henrik Lundqvist is Still a Top NHL Goaltender

Uncle Dru

Formerly Kakk Addict
Mar 12, 2012
645
494
All star games? lol

Look at Vezina voting. Top 3 several times, top 2 a few times and a winner. All while being top 5 more often than not.

Hate on him all you want because you despise the Rangers, but he's been the most consistent goalie over the past decade.

He's referring to the end of year All Star selections. Just looking back to Lundqvist's rookie year alone (05-06), the fact that Brodeur was selected to the Second All Star Team is laughable. Not to hate on Marty, but I recall him being fairly average that season and there were a handful of more deserving candidates. Just as he argues against Vezina voting, or any other statistic supporting Lundqvist, this can easily be argued against as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: belford222

Sentinel

Registered User
May 26, 2009
13,233
5,043
New Jersey
www.vvinenglish.com
He's referring to the end of year All Star selections. Just looking back to Lundqvist's rookie year alone (05-06), the fact that Brodeur was selected to the Second All Star Team is laughable. Not to hate on Marty, but I recall him being fairly average that season and there were a handful of more deserving candidates. Just as he argues against Vezina voting, or any other statistic supporting Lundqvist, this can easily be argued against as well.
You recall wrong. Brodeur was excellent that year, demonstrating that he was not just the DPE product. Lundquist does have the OG gold medal on him that year... but that's about all.
 

Uncle Dru

Formerly Kakk Addict
Mar 12, 2012
645
494
You recall wrong. Brodeur was excellent that year, demonstrating that he was not just the DPE product. Lundquist does have the OG gold medal on him that year... but that's about all.

Well, Lundqvist's Sv% and GAA were better than Brodeur's... And the notion the Devils D fell off a cliff post-lockout is simply not true. They were #1 in terms of CA/60 and xGA/60 up until Brodeur's final year (albeit I don't have this information for 05/06 & 06/07).
 
  • Like
Reactions: KirkAlbuquerque

MartyOwns

thank you shero
Apr 1, 2007
24,668
19,267
he's still a top 10 goalie in this league. he'll go down as one of the better goalies to never win a cup
 

haak84

Registered User
Oct 18, 2017
4,144
2,313
All star games? lol

Look at Vezina voting. Top 3 several times, top 2 a few times and a winner. All while being top 5 more often than not.

Hate on him all you want because you despise the Rangers, but he's been the most consistent goalie over the past decade.

For the last time season ending All-Star voting is not the same as regular season.

Vezina is way too weighted in his favor. There were quite a few years where a lone first place vote pushed him into the top 3. He was well behind (besides 05-06) the #1 and #2 goaltenders in the years he was the third candidate.

Stop being ignorant. His average year end all-star team placement is around 5. Which is where I would consistently rank him. If he was constantly top 3 then he would have more than one Vezina. He doesn't.
 

haak84

Registered User
Oct 18, 2017
4,144
2,313
Well, Lundqvist's Sv% and GAA were better than Brodeur's... And the notion the Devils D fell off a cliff post-lockout is simply not true. They were #1 in terms of CA/60 and xGA/60 up until Brodeur's final year (albeit I don't have this information for 05/06 & 06/07).

No it absolutely is true. Not only were they much weaker on defense but also on offense. Those mid 2000 teams were miserable and had around a 0.00 SRS. I can't believe this revisionist history. Sure they were just as good after losing 2 HoF defensemen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sentinel

haak84

Registered User
Oct 18, 2017
4,144
2,313
Also, if you would have watched the Devils that year instead of just looking up advanced stats, you would know that Brodeur started off the season ('05-'06) miserably. He then turned it around and ended extremely hot, propelling the Devils into contention. He had taken a year off after the lockout and was rusty when the season began but I guess 4 Vezinas in 5 seasons is not good enough here. See Brodeur was consistently a top 3 goaltender throughout his career, not someone like Lundqvist.

He started that season going 14-14-3 and ended going 29-9-4. Lundqvist only played 51 games and finished with a record of 30-12-9. He definitely deserved the 3rd place Vezina nomination and very well could have been #2. Brodeur only beat him by 7 votes and you could make the case his second half of the season was as good as Lundqvist's whole season. On top of finishing strong, the next season he set the wins record. So in a span of 123 games Brodeur went 77-32-11.
 
Last edited:

Uncle Dru

Formerly Kakk Addict
Mar 12, 2012
645
494
No it absolutely is true. Not only were they much weaker on defense but also on offense. Those mid 2000 teams were miserable and had around a 0.00 SRS. I can't believe this revisionist history. Sure they were just as good after losing 2 HoF defensemen.

When did I say they were just as good? I said they didn't fall off a cliff, and based off of purely objective statistical data, relative to the rest of the league, they clearly didn't. Yeah, their SRS was lousy, they sucked offensively...

Also, if you would have watched the Devils that year instead of just looking up advanced stats, you would know that Brodeur started off the season ('05-'06) miserably. He then turned it around and ended extremely hot, propelling the Devils into contention. He had taken a year off after the lockout and was rusty when the season began but I guess 4 Vezinas in 5 seasons is not good enough here. See Brodeur was consistently a top 3 goaltender throughout his career, not someone like Lundqvist.

He started that season going 14-14-3 and ended going 29-9-4. Lundqvist only played 51 games and finished with a record of 30-12-9. He definitely deserved the 3rd place Vezina nomination and very well could have been #2. Brodeur only beat him by 7 votes and you could make the case his second half of the season was as good as Lundqvist's whole season. On top of finishing strong, the next season he set the wins record. So in a span of 123 games Brodeur went 77-32-11.

Nope, don't watch too many Devil games so it only makes sense to use statistics that, while not foolproof, are fairly accurate indicators of individual/team success...certainly better than our own views, most of which are heavily influenced by our biases and preconceived notions.

I would imagine the end of year all star voting is based on overall body of work over the season, so why should his miserable start, as you put it, be ignored, regardless of the reasoning? Not trying to take shots at Brodeur, I think he's within the top 3 to play the position. More of a matter of you loving to bring up the end of year all star selections in Lundqvist threads and right off the bat the same issues you have with Vezina, ASG, etc. can be argued here.

When Ranger fans point out how middling many of the teams were in front of him you go on the attack. The fact is, and having not missed a Ranger game post lockout, they were an average defensive team statistically prior to AV bringing it down in the gutter and the eye test indicates just that...whereas you claiming those post-lockout Devils defenses were no good is a bit harder to believe.

And Lundqvist not constantly being a top 3 goaltender might have something to do with increased parity at the position. The only difference is, Hank is the only constant. You paint Lundqvist as a "top 5ish" Goalie but who can you ague is better once Brodeur's play fell off?

Lol no...It's more like you guys have a superiority complex. And that's all you got- because you couldn't buy championships and now you can't outright win championships the only other thing you can do is pump the tires in a homegrown player to appear to be more special than they actually are.

Believe me, Devils fans are much happier being able to actually attend games and not have them shelled out to corporations. Also happier to have watched a truly generational goaltender and not some fringe HoF'er who could never close the deal. And both fan bases will gladly take the championships than being forced to watch some homers like Sam Rosen and Valiquette.

Ugh, the Rangers are constantly in the bottom half of the league in terms of playoff scoring, in fact their playoff scoring over Lundqvist's career is downright bad. Couple that with them being below average defensively in the playoffs, it's quite easy to see why Hank doesn't have a cup. Despite that, Hank's personal playoff stats are phenomenal and his track record in Game 7s and elimination games are absolutely insane. Crazy notion, team has to be good to win things...

And lol at taking shots at Sam Rosen, class act who is no less complimentary of the opposition. I wish he was more objective like Chico Resch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: haveandare

Analyst365

Registered User
Oct 24, 2011
3,904
1,025
Victoria
He's just so reliable at failing when it matters the most. But as long as the hair gel and the bank account is straightened out its all win win.
 

Healthy DiPietro

Registered User
Jan 4, 2014
906
594
Tonight he tied Tony Esposito in wins, being tied 8th in NHL goalie history with 423 wins. Soon he surpasses Jacques Plante (437). But yeah, he should've taken his talents elsewhere, being a car salesman or something.

To be fair, you can add 17% more wins to goalies from older generations, if half of their ties count as wins.
 

TGWL

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 28, 2011
16,007
10,702
This thread is hilarious. Why does every Lundqvist thread have to be a debate about Lundqvist vs Brodeur, or how Lundqvist blames everybody else? If you followed Lundqvist during his career you'd know that most of it (up until the last few years) was spent blaming himself after every loss and goal. I also think it's pretty laughable to say Lundqvist hasn't been a top 3/top 4 goalie for most of his career. Just because we consider him one of the most consistent goalies since his debut doesn't mean we're insulting other goalies.

And Ranger fans, please stop the shitting on Brodeur rebuttal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: haveandare

Chimpradamus

Registered User
Feb 16, 2006
16,634
5,249
Northern Sweden
Greatest Game 7 goalie of all time.

Fails when it matters most.

Makes you think.
Hatred is stronger than actual stats - or the reality - if you set your mind to it. I mean, the arguments brought forth by the... well you know... are ridiculous. "He whines on his team for playing like garbage during the game!" (like they actually have for the majority of his career). If that's the strongest argument you want to present, well, I actually see that as a strength.

How about playing solid hockey for once and take the opportunity to win a game, which he has given his team on any given night for the last 12 years?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: EpicDing

Chimpradamus

Registered User
Feb 16, 2006
16,634
5,249
Northern Sweden
Let's wake up this silent thread when he passes Jacques Plante and hear more whining what a bad character he is when he's shouting at his Benny Hill defensemen to be better.
 

aufheben

#Norris4Fox
Jan 31, 2013
53,866
27,720
New Jersey
Henrik Lundqvist, 36, after 801 regular season games, will start his first game officially eliminated from the playoffs.

 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad