Hellebuyck at $8.5 or Shesterkin at $11.5?

Who do you take: Hellebuyck at $8.5 or Shesterkin at $11.5?

  • Hellebuyck at $8.5 for 7 years

    Votes: 104 92.9%
  • Shesterkin at $11.5 for 8 years

    Votes: 7 6.3%
  • Can't decide

    Votes: 1 0.9%

  • Total voters
    112

MyNameIsTaken

Registered User
Feb 8, 2021
38
57
Bias alert as a Jets fan, but I probably take Hellebuyck even on matching contracts. He’s been SO steady, SO consistently on such mediocre teams. We’re lucky to have him and with a 3 mil discount I wouldn’t look at the second name before picking him.

Again, biased 😊
 

SoundAndFury

Registered User
May 28, 2012
12,085
6,094
Hellebuyck took a ridiculously bad contract for himself when he had Bobrovsky, Price, Vasilevsky as comparables. This isn't rocket science.
 

Ignatius

Utah Direwolf
Apr 28, 2010
2,635
1,707
Sin Bin
Cheaper the goalie the better.

The current, defending Stanley Cup champions might disagree.

I would take Igor only because he has shown promise that he could carry a team in the playoffs stealing games and perhaps an entire series or more.

Teams don't hang banners in the rafters for "saving money" on player contracts.
 

bobholly39

Registered User
Mar 10, 2013
23,512
16,949
Voted Shesterkin.

Simply put - I think he's the slightly better goalie, and has especially done a lot better in playoffs. He's also younger by almost 3 years.

I don't think you're going to win or lose a Stanley Cup based on a $3M AAV difference. That's like a 13th forward and a 7th defenseman. You might win or lose a cup if your #1 goalie is so old that he's declining, or if your #1 goalie has struggled in playoffs.

Don't mean to be too harsh on Helle, whose done really well lately. I just prefer Shesterkin slightly.
 

cneely

Registered User
Jan 6, 2005
10,284
1,432
The current, defending Stanley Cup champions might disagree.

I would take Igor only because he has shown promise that he could carry a team in the playoffs stealing games and perhaps an entire series or more.

Teams don't hang banners in the rafters for "saving money" on player contracts.
No, but teams that save money by convincing players to take team friendly contracts can add other players with the money saved and have a better chance of hanging banners.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Peat

Section88

Kaner? I hardly know her
Jul 11, 2017
5,650
4,876
The current, defending Stanley Cup champions might disagree.

I would take Igor only because he has shown promise that he could carry a team in the playoffs stealing games and perhaps an entire series or more.

Teams don't hang banners in the rafters for "saving money" on player contracts.
I'm not saying you should just have a revolving door of udfa goalies as cheap as possible. But you dont need to pay a goalie over 10 mill a year when you can pay a goalie half or less than half that and get similar/identical results.

Thomas in 2011, Quick in 2012/2014, Crawford in 2013/2015, Binnington in 2019, Kuemper in 2022, Hill in 2023. All making 6 million or less, all good enough to win a cup.

Edit - I even forgot Matt Murray, who was still on his rookie deal when he led the penguins to a cup in 2016.
 

Ignatius

Utah Direwolf
Apr 28, 2010
2,635
1,707
Sin Bin
No, but teams that save money by convincing players to take team friendly contracts can add other players with the money saved and have a better chance of hanging banners.

I'm not saying you should just have a revolving door of udfa goalies as cheap as possible. But you dont need to pay a goalie over 10 mill a year when you can pay a goalie half or less than half that and get similar/identical results.

Thomas in 2011, Quick in 2012/2014, Crawford in 2013/2015, Binnington in 2019, Kuemper in 2022, Hill in 2023. All making 6 million or less, all good enough to win a cup.

Edit - I even forgot Matt Murray, who was still on his rookie deal when he led the penguins to a cup in 2016.

I am totally understand what you are both saying and I am not going to disagree with you. That being said I originally responded to someone who had said, "Cheaper the goalie the better" so in that vein Jets fans should be lining up to trade Helle to Pittsburgh for Jarry because he's $3 million dollars cheaper and just think of what they could spend that money on to improve their hopes as a potential contender for the Cup.

As it pertains to what the thread is asking, I'm still taking Igor contract and all.
 

Regal

Registered User
Mar 12, 2010
26,900
16,925
Vancouver
The $3M isn’t about getting a 7D, it’s about being able to make a deadline trade that removes your current $3M 7D and replaces him with a $6M 2D.

From a Canucks offseason perspective, they could have re-signed Zadorov instead of Desharnais. Or made a bigger push for Jake Guentzel instead of DeBrusk.

I think sometimes 3 million in space can be overstated because often it doesn’t come down to either-or scenarios, but it certainly can be a decent factor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tarheelhockey

jetsforever

Registered User
Dec 14, 2013
28,157
24,757
The current, defending Stanley Cup champions might disagree.

I would take Igor only because he has shown promise that he could carry a team in the playoffs stealing games and perhaps an entire series or more.

Teams don't hang banners in the rafters for "saving money" on player contracts.

Hellebuyck was probably the main reason we swept the Oilers in the 2021 playoffs.
 

Pavel Buchnevich

"Pavel Buchnevich The Fake"
Dec 8, 2013
60,475
27,354
New York
I know all the hipster experts think having good goaltending is a bad thing and they prefer to build teams cup winning teams like the Leafs and Oilers, so of course they’ll take the goalie being paid less. They don’t even like Hellebuyck’s contract. They just like that he’s paid less.

Hellebuyck took a bad deal. He should’ve asked for more. He’s a good goaltender, although not very proven in the postseason. Maybe unfair and he should get a chance to prove that reputation this season. Shestyorkin’s contract is more than fair also. Not as team friendly, but he didn’t take a crazy discount. He took a fair deal.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad