I’ve been slower on the uptake than almost everyone here on Kochetkov. I’m starting to come around to the notion of us having a future starter here. I always thought he was too out of control to be an everyday starter, but there does seem to be a method to the madness in his two starts this year. The concern with guys like that isn’t the ability to make the big save but the ability to make every save he’s supposed to. I’ve been especially impressed the last two games with his ability to fight through traffic and stay big while still making the “unorthodox” save. He’s got the flexibility to get into a somewhat unorthodox butterfly that covers the entire bottom of the net when traffic gets messy in front, and that allowed him to make some impressive saves on “hack and whack” chances for Chicago in the 1st that I don’t think a lot of goalies save. I’m impressed and I’ll let myself get excited about a goalie prospect.
(I do refuse to call him “Koochie.”)
I think most fans soured on him a little bit after he looked awful against the Rangers at the very end of our playoff run this summer. The confidence wasn't there. He looked small. He wasn't half the player he was when we beat the Rags to clinch the Metro at the end of the regular season.
Nevertheless, his overall body of work in the NHL is really impressive thus far. He's also nothing like Canes goalies of old. He is about as far removed from a Cam Ward as you can get. He's a scrambler of the Petr Mrazek or Hasek school, but with his size he covers much more of the net. Stylistically I'd love to hear a better comparison from one of you.
I think Kochetkov is cementing his ticket here next year as a starter or backup. I love Raanta but the man is too injured. Freddie Andersen is also oft-injured so we're in a pickle there. Also, Freddie might want more term or more dollar than the Borg will give. I think 2 years of Freddie tandem-ing with Kochetkov is ideal. I'm not sure we'll find a better goalie next year in free agency than Andersen, warts and all.
We don't yet know we have a sure thing, but it's looking promising.