rangersfansince08
Registered User
- Oct 8, 2019
- 5,604
- 4,913
Makar is and will continue to be better.Having seen Ray Bourque's entire career yes Quinn Hughes is under whelming in comparison.
Compared to anyone else Quinn Hughes is very good. He came into a much worse situation than Makar and at every age has been BETTER than Makar. Hughes is a year younger and in a much worse development situation.
But much like when Martin Skoula was better to start his career than the Sedins we will see who comes out on top after an entire career.
Don’t really think it’s fair to compare quinn to makar who might go down as better than bobby orr
I don't think people realize how good Orr was in comparison to his peers. Makar isn't anywhere close to being that much better than his peers.
1974-75 NHL Awards Voting | Hockey-Reference.com
www.hockey-reference.com
Orr finished with 135 points this season. Potvin finished 2nd with just 76. 59 more for Orr or 78% more.
1973-74 NHL Awards Voting | Hockey-Reference.com
www.hockey-reference.com
Orr had 122 pts this season. 40 more than second place Park. 49% more.
1972-73 NHL Awards Voting | Hockey-Reference.com
www.hockey-reference.com
Orr with 101 this season. Lapointe in second place with 54. 87% more for Orr.
1971-72 NHL Awards Voting | Hockey-Reference.com
www.hockey-reference.com
Orr with 117. Park in second place with 73. 61% more production for Orr.
Last edited: