HaNotsri
Regstred User
- Dec 29, 2013
- 8,663
- 6,537
Not sure Messi is the best football player of all time. Gretzky is on another level and while the talent pool of hockey is smaller that talent pool is already elite.
Because that's pretty much impossible to do in soccer. A tiny fraction of people play hockey and football compared those who play soccer, the more people that do an activity or sport the less likely there'll be outliners and the separation between the very best and those below them will be less.The dominance from Gretzky and Brady over shadow Messi's, while being the best in his sport he hasn't separated himself from Pele, Maradona and Ronaldo like the other 2 have from their peers.
Can you? But sure, next time I'll put in a "No, they're all exactly the same" option for questions that are too complex for you to formulate an opinion on.wheres the everyone is on the same level option? I guess thinking is hard
Problem with Gretzky is, I don't think he was better than Lemieux or Orr. Greater sure due to health.Not sure Messi is the best football player of all time. Gretzky is on another level and while the talent pool of hockey is smaller that talent pool is already elite.
Basketball around the world is slightly different than NBA. There have been plenty of highly succesfull players even in the NBA who have been slightly above average in so called physical stature. Similar line can be said about football (soccer) actually, it greatly favours smaller players.
There is huge amount of basketball players around the world, thus is can't be considered niche. There are certain set of physical attributes that give you an advantage to play basketball, then there's certain set of physical attributes that give you an advantage at playing football, etc.
When it comes to players of mentioned calibre certain things have to fall in place to reach these heights (physical attributes that are conducive to the played sport, genetic lottery, and hard work), and size of the pool isn't as big of a deciding factor (I'm talking specifically about these types of players).
barca benefitted more from messi than vice versa. they had great player's before, but never close to the success. young messi was a two way monster, which made barca's play style possible. after the losing the ball control messi was reacting so quickly to put pressure on the ball barca in most instances regained the ball immediately.No, Messi benefitted a lot from amazing Barcelona teams to get all the goals he scored as well as UEFA basically gifting Barca numerous games in the champions league.
And the refs helped greatly with Argentina this year. I would rate Tom Brady and Gretzky over Messi any day of the week.
if you look at the standings the tour de france in the armstrong years, you can clearly see few teams dominating. there was not an equal access to dope. armstrong had the best dope support by far.If we purely talk greatest athlete in my view, I know it's very controversial, but I'd go Lance Armstrong. I know he doped, but it was the norm in his era. Winning that many consecutive Tour de France (I think 6 or 7) is incredible. I think pro cycling is by far the hardest sport in the world. It's the only sport in which suffering is that prevalent on a day to day basis. So in my view he's the greatest athlete ever.
Among the greatest at their sports. Far from the greatest athletes. That’s for those great at multiple sports.After Messi's performance and victory in the recent world cup I've heard this argument being brought up in conversation more than ever. All three have achieved simular levels of dominace in their respective sports and they are commonly regarded along with a handful of others such as Mohammed Ali, Jerry Rice, Babe Ruth, Tiger Woods, Serena Williams, Usain Bolt, Roger Federer (to name a few others but not all) as amongst the greatest athletes of all time. The one thing that Messi has over all the others is that he has achieved an almost unparalleled level of domiance in the biggest sport in the world. In soccer history he is seemingly only matched by Pele but that was when the sport was smaller.
Now I'm not a big soccer fan by any means, the sport barely even registers in my mind outside of the world cup but I do recognize the fact that it is the biggest and most popular sport in the world and has been for quite some time now. This is relevant in this conversation because it means that it has the largest talent pool to draw from. This should make it much more difficult for any single individual to come along and dominate the sport and there should be many players at the top vying to be recognized as the sports best player year in year out and yet Messi has been largerly unrivaled for that title.
Seeing as how this is a hockey forum I think we all know which way the result will trend towards.... But I'm still curious about it and the arguments for and against. So what say you?
Basketball has grown a lot in recent years and Jordan and the Dream team were a huge part of that. The international players, who made the NBA without going to college (like Olajuwon) were extremly rare. Drazen Petrovic died young in a car accident, before he could make an impact.Basketball is not a "very niche sport", and has, compared to ice hockey, orders of magnitude more players (pro and amateur) world wide.
looking at young messi you can clearly see, that he processes the game quicker than anybody in all situations. his awareness is off the charts.Nah, people who ever believed C. Ronaldo was better than Messi are deluded, and I actually hated Barca in Messi's prime. Ronaldo is a better athlete of course but Messi has been a technically superior player from day one, with significantly better ball skills, a much better playmaker, and MUCH smarter overall. This is like comparing Ovechkin and Mario Lemieux.
Mbappé has some gaudy numbers but he's playing in an inferior league, and his reputation owes a lot to two short tournaments. He needs to move to Spain or England as soon as possible. He's a very unique talent for sure but I'm feeling quite comfortable to say that Messi was clearly a better player at the age of 23.
There are two things that always stood out about Messi for me. First, he not only exceeded the benchmarks set by all-time great forwards before him; he simply tore them apart. 50 goals in a single La Liga season in 2012 is incredible, and even more so for a player who wasn't deployed as a pure goal scorer, as he was playing in a deeper role and was consistently creating a ton of scoring chances for his teammates.
Second, he's always been a player that seemingly never makes mistakes like flawed passes, failed dribbles, botched attempts at a shot, bad first touches etc. There are players like this but those are used in more defensive roles, such as deep-lying midfielders or central defenders. It's something else for a purely offensive player like Messi though, who (given the nature of position) has consistently been taking a lot of risky plays. Especially in his (very long) prime, it looked like he was ALWAYS making the right decision, with the ball or without it. His technical ability and sense of the game were out of this planet, even compared to other all-time greats.
the ability to judge players here starts and stops with the colour of the jersey for most posters.True lol, we here can barely compare hockey forwards to hockey defencemen to hockey goalies.
No. Anyone who knows anything about football would say it's still Maradona.Has Messi surpassed Gretzky/Jordan and others as the GOAT for all sports?