Has diving become a normalized part of the game?

BraveCanadian

Registered User
Jun 30, 2010
15,569
5,000
Unfortunately, yes.

A lot of people don't value sportsmanship, and don't respect the game, themselves or their opponents and so they feel that cheating is somehow showing competitiveness.

It is a really sad and demoralizing way of thinking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: longtime lurker

Sting

Registered User
Feb 8, 2004
8,127
3,376
He’s really cut it out of his game this season but no one is going to notice or care.
Nope - once Montreal fans jump on that train with their fearless leader Brendan Gallagher, the epitome of professionalism and respect for the game, there's no going back.

I think more than outright diving, what annoys me most is the "down by 1 goal, I'm going to embellish every single action taken against me".

This is employed by virtually every top team in the league and there's no way that's going away. It really is up to the refs to cut this out of the game and it must be incredibly difficult from their viewpoint on the ice to do this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gil Gunderson

HockeyVirus

Woll stan.
Nov 15, 2020
20,346
31,227
Absolutely. So many very obvious dives happen that do not get fined or penalized but called out by coaches (usually in game we can clearly see them saying it to the refs).

The second issue is when they do call a dive, almost always it ends up 4 on 4 as they take both and not just the diver.

The natural progression is we even see coaches and stuff talking about when you take a high stick, you need to make it obvious you got hit. Throw your head back, that kind of thing because if not more times than not the refs let it go.

My recommendations:

1. Rule change that diving infractions are 4 minutes so when refs call both, teams are punished for diving.

2. DOPS to take diving more seriously and start enforcing progressive fines that lead into suspensions. The fact that we can list a handful of players such as Stutzle known to be falling all over the ice every game and he gets nothing said to him can only be taken as endorsement.
 

JPT

Registered User
Jul 4, 2024
976
1,892
I think the more interesting question would be, "Do fans of teams who dive the most see fewer dives?"
 

Machinehead

HFNYR MVP
Jan 21, 2011
150,109
132,280
NYC
Try and revise history all you want but I’ve been watching hockey since the 1980s. The simple reality is that the prevalence and acceptance of diving is at an all time high.
I love how your perception of it is just fact.

In my opinion -and I've been doing this a long time too- there's nothing hockey fans complain more about than diving, and they've always complained about it, so it must have always been happening.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Laus723 and OKR

PatriceBergeronFan

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 15, 2011
62,186
41,172
USA
Applauded more than ever before, endorsed by incompetent officials, and supported by worthless Parros who chooses one player a season to fine once for embellishment.

Cringeworthy as it has escalated beyond head jerks for near high sticks to feigning season ending knee injuries and concussions.
 

OKR

Registered User
Nov 18, 2015
3,602
3,824
Players don’t necessarily dive more, they just don’t fight to stay up as much as they used to.

Ever since they tighten up the rules to prevent ”clutch n grab” hockey there really hasn’t been a reason to actively try to stay up, that combined with the speed of the game constantly getting faster leads to players losing balance easier.
 

Matthews4Calder

Registered User
Nov 27, 2016
549
397
BC Western Canada
It all boils down to the people that run the league. Soccer is the same but EUFA, FIFA whomever are clueless. Start punishing the players more harshly. NHL the same. I always thought if you're calling a guy for a trip whatever and also hand out an embellishment penalty there lies the problem. maybe just call the embellishment. Crack down on the people embellishing and maybe it will reduce the diving that we see. Soccer is a joke let's keep hockey from becoming the same.
 

blankall

Registered User
Jul 4, 2007
15,163
5,575
Always was. In fact that used to refer to it as one of those "veteran plays". I would say the strategy seems to have become more ingrained with the coaching now and how important power plays are.

This really took off post lockout. The 2010/11 Canucks used diving as their main strategy to win games. Antagonize, dive, get the call, send out the Sedins to cycle on the PP. Worked pretty well until the finals when the refs (and the non-canucks viewers) decided they'd had enough and put the whistles away a bit. The Bruins were equally good at antagonizing but dominated the Canucks physically.

Was hoping that the Canucks pounding was the end of diving, but it always sneaks it's way back into the game. A lesser, but similar, thing happened to the Oilers, but then they met the Panthers. The Panthers, like the Bruins, had the combo of both antagonizing players and players who could back things up physically.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crow

Golden_Jet

Registered User
Sep 21, 2005
27,356
14,459
Absolutely. So many very obvious dives happen that do not get fined or penalized but called out by coaches (usually in game we can clearly see them saying it to the refs).

The second issue is when they do call a dive, almost always it ends up 4 on 4 as they take both and not just the diver.

The natural progression is we even see coaches and stuff talking about when you take a high stick, you need to make it obvious you got hit. Throw your head back, that kind of thing because if not more times than not the refs let it go.

My recommendations:

1. Rule change that diving infractions are 4 minutes so when refs call both, teams are punished for diving.

2. DOPS to take diving more seriously and start enforcing progressive fines that lead into suspensions. The fact that we can list a handful of players such as Stutzle known to be falling all over the ice every game and he gets nothing said to him can only be taken as endorsement.
lol, a leafs player has had a more recent embellishment player get called than him,

Yes there can be a trip and an embellishment on the same call. Player was tripped but also embellished.
 

Cup or Bust

Registered User
Oct 17, 2017
4,578
4,128
Since 2005 diving has been more prominent. It was definitely less previously when you were allowed to hook and hold more, the incentive to go down was much less.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lazlo Hollyfeld

HockeyVirus

Woll stan.
Nov 15, 2020
20,346
31,227
lol, a leafs player has had a more recent embellishment player get called than him,

Yes there can be a trip and an embellishment on the same call. Player was tripped but also embellished.

Not sure what Leafs have to do with this. My point was punish the embellishment more severe than the penalty to stop heads throwing back like they got JFK'd by a slight high stick or every time they feel a stick in their legs diving like they are trying to take a bullet for the president.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Golden_Jet

MakoSlade

Registered User
Nov 17, 2005
883
502
New York City
He’s really cut it out of his game this season but no one is going to notice or care.
A bad reputation is easy to get and hard to get rid of.

As for the nostalgia of diving, it has always been present. Seems ridiculous nowadays, but maybe that is because we can literally watch every NHL game and find a safe place to rage about it.

Old school example, Mario Lemieux. Guy could skate through a brick wall carrying the puck, and yet the slightest tap put him down like a shotgun blast.
 

Golden_Jet

Registered User
Sep 21, 2005
27,356
14,459
Not sure what Leafs have to do with this. My point was punish the embellishment more severe than the penalty to stop heads throwing back like they got JFK'd by a slight high stick or every time they feel a stick in their legs diving like they are trying to take a bullet for the president.
Guess you’ve never been high-sticked in the face then,
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lazlo Hollyfeld

NyQuil

Big F$&*in Q
Jan 5, 2005
99,943
67,103
Ottawa, ON
A bad reputation is easy to get and hard to get rid of.

As for the nostalgia of diving, it has always been present. Seems ridiculous nowadays, but maybe that is because we can literally watch every NHL game and find a safe place to rage about it.

Old school example, Mario Lemieux. Guy could skate through a brick wall carrying the puck, and yet the slightest tap put him down like a shotgun blast.

Well he’s paying for it now.

He’ll get hauled down in front of the ref and there will be no call.

It’s the bed he made and now he has to sleep in it.

As you say, it’s not just a reputation with fans but with the officials as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MakoSlade

Lazlo Hollyfeld

The jersey ad still sucks
Sponsor
Mar 4, 2004
30,345
30,545
I love how your perception of it is just fact.

In my opinion -and I've been doing this a long time too- there's nothing hockey fans complain more about than diving, and they've always complained about it, so it must have always been happening.

That's some faulty logic there, starting with a false premise.

It's not just my memory. Think of how the whole league was in the past. More fighting. More physical play. Don't miss games due to injury, certainly not for mental health or family issues. No faceguards. No friggin helmets at one point. (To be clear I'm not saying these things were good).

You didn't dive if someone lightly tapped your shin because you'd get a rep around the league and your own teammates would have less respect for you.
 

Perfect_Drug

Registered User
Mar 24, 2006
16,281
13,096
Montreal
There isn't really any reprocussions for diving.

What usually happens is the ref bites on the dive and calls a penalty.
Worst that happens is offsetting minors, maybe a chump change fine a few weeks later.



If you ain't cheating you ain't trying.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rodgerwilco

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad