Has any team ever came back from 0-3 deficit in NHL history?

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/
Status
Not open for further replies.

BluesyShoes

Unregistered User
Dec 11, 2010
494
515
I'll tell you what this is, this is the most amazing coaching performance I've ever seen out of Kris Knoblauch.
Do you mean for Kris Knoblauch or like for all coaches best performance you’ve seen? Not gonna challenge you on it because I don’t have an opinion on that, just curious as they are pretty different.
 

acor

Registered User
Jan 13, 2012
1,380
429
It's funny that 5/10 comebacks from 0-3 down to 3-3, and 2/4 completed reverse sweeps (potentially 3/5) actually happened since lockout.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DitchMarner

Rafafouille

Registered User
May 12, 2015
1,570
1,775
QC
It's funny that 5/10 comebacks from 0-3 down to 3-3, and 2/4 completed reverse sweeps (potentially 3/5) actually happened since lockout.

Funny maybe but it makes sense. Salary cap brought much needed parity. You're never coming back from 0-3 against the 2001 Avalanche or 2002 Red Wings. Nowadays teams are so evenly matched that it's a lot more likely.
 

HabsQC

Registered User
Sep 27, 2008
5,784
5,595
Gatineau, Quebec
FB_IMG_1719080447415.jpg


Joke
.
.
.
.
.
Head

I got you

images (1).jpeg
 

GMR

Registered User
Jul 27, 2013
6,648
5,673
Parts Unknown
Scores were:

6-3
3-0
4-1
5-1
The Kings then won their first two games in round two against Anaheim on the road, before losing their next three, including two home games, before winning that series. In the next round, they almost blew a 3-1 lead against Chicago.

What a strange playoff run.
 

Nasti

Registered User
Jan 30, 2006
4,412
5,969
Long Beach, CA
The Kings then won their first two games in round two against Anaheim on the road, before losing their next three, including two home games, before winning that series. In the next round, they almost blew a 3-1 lead against Chicago.

What a strange playoff run.
First time a team won two playoff rounds in the same year after losing three in a row in each. They also won three straight games where they trailed 2-0 between Game 7 of the Hawks series, and Games 1-2 of the Rangers series. Also a first. Not to mention 3 straight Game 7s on the road.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kingsholygrail

MacMacandBarbie

Registered User
Dec 9, 2019
2,871
1,894
It has been a professional league since it's beginnings with the NHA. "National Hockey Association of Canada Limited, was a professional ice hockey organization with teams in Ontario and Quebec, Canada. It is the direct predecessor of today's National Hockey League (NHL), and much of the business processes of the NHL today are based on the NHA." It was and still is a professional league.
Y'all are being so disingenuous to that poster's comment. Just because you call it something doesn't make it true.

If the best players in your league need 2nd jobs to make ends meet, they aren't a professional. A professional is able to be full time dedicated to their craft. If your craft doesn't pay the bills, then there can't be professionals in that craft, only 'experts' and unfortunately in the 1940s, saying you want to be a professional hockey player was akin to saying you want to be a professional coin collector. You might get some side eyed looks and people telling you that you might also want to look into getting a professional job that pays the bills.
 

BraveCanadian

Registered User
Jun 30, 2010
15,259
4,485
Y'all are being so disingenuous to that poster's comment. Just because you call it something doesn't make it true.

If the best players in your league need 2nd jobs to make ends meet, they aren't a professional. A professional is able to be full time dedicated to their craft. If your craft doesn't pay the bills, then there can't be professionals in that craft, only 'experts' and unfortunately in the 1940s, saying you want to be a professional hockey player was akin to saying you want to be a professional coin collector. You might get some side eyed looks and people telling you that you might also want to look into getting a professional job that pays the bills.

You are wildly ignorant of what professional hockey players were paid back in the day. By your reasoning a lot of professional hockey players in the lower leagues and Europe today are not professional players.

Way back, many players made a full average household yearly income during the hockey season alone.. and then had a summer job more for something to do and/or promotion work than necessity. The stars were making several multiples of the average family income at most times.

I don't have all the figures at hand but this site appears to go into many of the details:

 

GMR

Registered User
Jul 27, 2013
6,648
5,673
Parts Unknown
Interesting how in 2010 and 2011, three separate teams forced a game 7 after being down 3-0. Fun times in the NHL.
 

Leaf Fans

Registered User
Sep 29, 2017
20,992
9,108
It's a good thing the New York/Brooklyn Americans were still a thing in 1942 then.
Exactly!

Y'all are being so disingenuo to that poster's comment. Just because you call it something doesn't make it true.

If the best players in your league need 2nd jobs to make ends meet, they aren't a professional. A professional is able to be full time dedicated to their craft. If your craft doesn't pay the bills, then there can't be professionals in that craft, only 'experts' and unfortunately in the 1940s, saying you want to be a professional hockey player was akin to saying you want to be a professional coin collector. You might get some side eyed looks and people telling you that you might also want to look into getting a professional job that pays the bills.
Lol. Sure it was. Besides, players had summer jobs.
 

MacMacandBarbie

Registered User
Dec 9, 2019
2,871
1,894
You are wildly ignorant of what professional hockey players were paid back in the day. By your reasoning a lot of professional hockey players in the lower leagues and Europe today are not professional players.

Way back, many players made a full average household yearly income during the hockey season alone.. and then had a summer job more for something to do and/or promotion work than necessity. The stars were making several multiples of the average family income at most times.

I don't have all the figures at hand but this site appears to go into many of the details:

That breaks down from the 60s and onward, poster clearly said before 1950. Most players in the league couldn’t afford to play just hockey alone before then, that is just a fact. After the war was over and more money came to the game in the 50s, that changed, but the argument he made is fair.
 

BraveCanadian

Registered User
Jun 30, 2010
15,259
4,485
That breaks down from the 60s and onward, poster clearly said before 1950. Most players in the league couldn’t afford to play just hockey alone before then, that is just a fact. After the war was over and more money came to the game in the 50s, that changed, but the argument he made is fair.

Wrong
 
  • Like
Reactions: jigglysquishy

lextune

I'm too old for this.
Jun 9, 2008
12,297
3,924
New Hampshire
Not only that, but the flyers came back down 3-0 in game 7 and won the game 4-3.

It almost sounds too fake to be true.
It was a horrifying sight to behold.

Bruins swept the Flyers the following year on the way to the Cup. It's the only reason I can even talk about the reverse sweep, lol.

Krejci dislocated his wrist in game three and the Bs fell to pieces.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad