Habs win in Philly by the skin of their teeth

  • We sincerely apologize for the extended downtime. Our hosting provider, XenForo Cloud, encountered a major issue with their backup system, which unfortunately resulted in the loss of some critical data from the past year.

    What This Means for You:

    • If you created an account after March 2024, it no longer exists. You will need to sign up again to access the forum.
    • If you registered before March 2024 but changed your email, username, or password in the past year, those changes were lost. You’ll need to update your account details manually once you're logged in.
    • Threads and posts created within the last year have been restored.
    • Our 2025 light and dark themes were lost, so we are rebuilding them. Light theme is currently available, but work in progress

    Our team is working with Xenforo Cloud to recover data using backups, sitemaps, and other available resources. We know this is frustrating, and we deeply regret the impact on our community. We are taking steps with Xenforo Cloud to ensure this never happens again. This is work in progress. Thank you for your patience and support as we work through this.

    In the meantime, feel free to join our Discord Server
I said it for a while now (even when Dach was looking good at center).... I think he is more of a power forward winger than a true type center.

Ideally, our roster looks like this next year:
I would definitely try Demidov at center with Laine/Dach on his wing.

Caufield / Suzuki / Slaf
Laine / Demidov / Dach
Roy / Kapanen / Newhook
Armia / Evans / Gallagher
Pezzetta,

What do we do with Anderson? Not sure. I think it's between him, Armia, and hate to say it... Newhook. Newhook is hard to place in our line-up and I don't think he wins too many puck battles. Is he putting up enough production?
Why the hell would you re-sign UFA Armia???
 
I don't mind him, or Anderson, or Dvorak or Armia on their own either...

Collectively, they are one of the weakest over 25 veteran forward groups in the league, and at a 20M$ cap hit.

While roster additions are more complicated than just crunching numbers, consider how much better our roster is today if you swap them @ 20M for 2x 8M$ legit top 6 contributors and 2x 2M$ depth vets...

last summer, 20M freed up to spend could've been

Stamkos + Marchessault + Monahan + OS Holloway

Or
Lindholm + Montour + Bertuzzi

Etc. etc.

Honestly I’m looking at what you’ve posted and I’m pretty glad we didn’t.

How many of those contracts look good to you?
 
Few players are paid 6.5 millions. Most teams have maybe 5 players paid 6.5+ millionss. Avs have 5 MacKinnon, Rantanen, Landeskob, Makar and Toews. NYR has 5 Panarin, Zibanejad, Kreider, Fox and Trouba. Vegas has 5 Eichel, Stone, Hertl, Pietrangelo and Hanifin. Dallas got 5 Seguin, Benn, Hintz, Robertson and Heiskanen.

People act like half the league is paid 6.5 millions. Again it's not a problem for now but it will likely be a problem before the contract is over. KH needs to be ready and he needs to have a plan.
you may be right. But I was referring to most teams having contracts that are unfavorable regardless of price. Thanks
 
The Flyers are similar to the Habs, plenty of defensive deficiencies and they leave plenty of room out there for scoring chances. We played well till the last 5 minutes of the third period. Most of the team showed the wear of two games in two nights and seemed to fall apart.

The call on Xhekaj was the worst officiating I have ever seen, Hughes should call the league about that one, just brutal.
 
I watched over 2 periods of the game, as I really wanted to see Michkov since I have been hard on him in the past and did not want us to pick him (though I thought for sure the pick was going to be Will Smith who is even smaller) his stats had me do a double take as clearly he's gotten off to a great start but I wasn't impressed at all. I thought he had a good shift on the PP in the last minute of the 1st and I missed parts here and there but overall just wasn't overly impressed.

That was painful to watch though as it looked like 2 bad teams, I thought a number of Habs disappointed. Newhook, Dvorak, Armia, Xhekaj, plus Kapanen did not look very good either and Mailloux I would not have called up until he shows he can fix his defensive issues more, shows imo he needs more time in Laval.
 
I watched over 2 periods of the game, as I really wanted to see Michkov since I have been hard on him in the past and did not want us to pick him (though I thought for sure the pick was going to be Will Smith who is even smaller) his stats had me do a double take as clearly he's gotten off to a great start but I wasn't impressed at all. I thought he had a good shift on the PP in the last minute of the 1st and I missed parts here and there but overall just wasn't overly impressed.

That was painful to watch though as it looked like 2 bad teams, I thought a number of Habs disappointed. Newhook, Dvorak, Armia, Xhekaj, plus Kapanen did not look very good either and Mailloux I would not have called up until he shows he can fix his defensive issues more, shows imo he needs more time in Laval.

I agree. People here have been overly invested on Michkov, but I thought he was not good at all. Made some nifty passes on the PP, but by and large was bad without the puck, easily overpowered and not very dangerous. His game this year has been on the PP and has one of the worst defensive plays of the year, which led to his team losing the game.
 
The call on Xhekaj was the worst officiating I have ever seen, Hughes should call the league about that one, just brutal.
This was the worst non-call for me.

tumblr_m0wjwguRbL1qmazcxo1_400.gif
 
I watched over 2 periods of the game, as I really wanted to see Michkov since I have been hard on him in the past and did not want us to pick him (though I thought for sure the pick was going to be Will Smith who is even smaller) his stats had me do a double take as clearly he's gotten off to a great start but I wasn't impressed at all. I thought he had a good shift on the PP in the last minute of the 1st and I missed parts here and there but overall just wasn't overly impressed.

That was painful to watch though as it looked like 2 bad teams, I thought a number of Habs disappointed. Newhook, Dvorak, Armia, Xhekaj, plus Kapanen did not look very good either and Mailloux I would not have called up until he shows he can fix his defensive issues more, shows imo he needs more time in Laval.

I agree. People here have been overly invested on Michkov, but I thought he was not good at all. Made some nifty passes on the PP, but by and large was bad without the puck, easily overpowered and not very dangerous. His game this year has been on the PP and has one of the worst defensive plays of the year, which led to his team losing the game.
He’s a rookie playing his first ever games at this level. Remember Slafkovsky the 1OA? Young players need time.

Producing despite being not fully up to speed is a good thing imo but for his own sake I hope he doesn’t pick up bad habits and cheat to produce.

I re-watched the highlights and noticed that Caufield celebrated the goal well before anyone else realized it was in... goal scorers know !
Like Patrick Kane’s OT Cup Winner in 2010 or Crosby’s Golden Goal at the Olympics
 
  • Like
Reactions: badfish
I watched over 2 periods of the game, as I really wanted to see Michkov since I have been hard on him in the past and did not want us to pick him (though I thought for sure the pick was going to be Will Smith who is even smaller) his stats had me do a double take as clearly he's gotten off to a great start but I wasn't impressed at all. I thought he had a good shift on the PP in the last minute of the 1st and I missed parts here and there but overall just wasn't overly impressed.

That was painful to watch though as it looked like 2 bad teams, I thought a number of Habs disappointed. Newhook, Dvorak, Armia, Xhekaj, plus Kapanen did not look very good either and Mailloux I would not have called up until he shows he can fix his defensive issues more, shows imo he needs more time in Laval.
Michkov a rookie, point a game player on one of worst teams in league. He's 100 points written all over him as he matures
 
Producing despite being not fully up to speed is a good thing imo but for his own sake I hope he doesn’t pick up bad habits and cheat to produce.
Tortorella wants him to cheat, which is weird, he is becoming soft.
I thought Michkov showed quite a lot of talent. He was not dominant, but the skills are there.
He was not great in that game though.
He'll be a top player for sure, maybe not elite, it remains to be seen, but a pretty good one.
 
I watched over 2 periods of the game, as I really wanted to see Michkov since I have been hard on him in the past and did not want us to pick him (though I thought for sure the pick was going to be Will Smith who is even smaller) his stats had me do a double take as clearly he's gotten off to a great start but I wasn't impressed at all. I thought he had a good shift on the PP in the last minute of the 1st and I missed parts here and there but overall just wasn't overly impressed.

That was painful to watch though as it looked like 2 bad teams, I thought a number of Habs disappointed. Newhook, Dvorak, Armia, Xhekaj, plus Kapanen did not look very good either and Mailloux I would not have called up until he shows he can fix his defensive issues more, shows imo he needs more time in Laval.
Looks aren't deceiving they are two bad teams. The Flyers goaltending would be considered bad in the AHL.
I won't comment on the Vets you mentioned but Kapanen is not going to move the needle very much IMO.
He's adequate but nothing more so far. I guess they like that he hasn't crumbled defensively but he's playing a rung or two above his pay grade.
Mailloux will be back in Laval soon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: montreal
I watched over 2 periods of the game, as I really wanted to see Michkov since I have been hard on him in the past and did not want us to pick him (though I thought for sure the pick was going to be Will Smith who is even smaller) his stats had me do a double take as clearly he's gotten off to a great start but I wasn't impressed at all. I thought he had a good shift on the PP in the last minute of the 1st and I missed parts here and there but overall just wasn't overly impressed.

That was painful to watch though as it looked like 2 bad teams, I thought a number of Habs disappointed. Newhook, Dvorak, Armia, Xhekaj, plus Kapanen did not look very good either and Mailloux I would not have called up until he shows he can fix his defensive issues more, shows imo he needs more time in Laval.
Unless he gets a couple of steps faster, two more years in Laval won't help. He is an inefficient skater.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Andrei79
Happy to have Gally on the team. He brings something but that contract
It seems like Evans is the only center who could compliment Anderson and Gally. That looks contrary to say but they somehow contribute to the pace of the game I would never beleive it could happen. But for how many games they will do better than their opponents?
 
It seems like Evans is the only center who could compliment Anderson and Gally. That looks contrary to say but they somehow contribute to the pace of the game I would never beleive it could happen. But for how many games they will do better than their opponents?
Everything depends on what their role is with the team will be moving forward. If they stay with the current plan and TOI, there won't be a drop off.
 
I agree. People here have been overly invested on Michkov, but I thought he was not good at all. Made some nifty passes on the PP, but by and large was bad without the puck, easily overpowered and not very dangerous. His game this year has been on the PP and has one of the worst defensive plays of the year, which led to his team losing the game.

The game to game analysis of this guy is already nauseating. It's coming from both sides.

Certain guys are lamenting not taking him and run to their keyboard everytime he farts on the ice to talk about his perfect smell.

Then you have another side that will pick a weaker game and use that to bring him down.

I have purposely not posted about him since training camp, but it looks like there's no escaping it in many threads and it looks like it will be that way for the next 15 years.
 
Unless he gets a couple of steps faster, two more years in Laval won't help. He is an inefficient skater.
I think so. He might have a ceiling higher than Newhook and Xhekaj. Dvorak and Armia are desperate cases, they are old. Mailloux is still very young and could improve when placed on good conditions of learning. Laval is a good place.
 
Tortorella wants him to cheat, which is weird, he is becoming soft.
I thought Michkov showed quite a lot of talent. He was not dominant, but the skills are there.
He was not great in that game though.
He'll be a top player for sure, maybe not elite, it remains to be seen, but a pretty good one.
I watched Tortorella. He's not himself. He surrendered to the soft culture of the organisation.
He's paid to stay calm in front of the cameras and collect his check.
 
I think so. He might have a ceiling higher than Newhook and Xhekaj. Dvorak and Armia are desperate cases, they are old. Mailloux is still very young and could improve when placed on good conditions of learning. Laval is a good place.
To appreciate the current state of the re-build and why the team is struggling early this season, one only needs to review why the team was largely competitive last year. What has changed?

As I have argued, the Canadiens were competitive last season for three reasons: 1) their top line of Suzuki, Slafkovsky and Caufield was one of the league's most impactful, top lines; 2) their goaltending was consistently above average and 3) their defence was among the most mobile in the league.

This year, until recently, Suzuki's play has been listless and unproductive, Slafkovsky has been injured, with only Caufield playing to an expected high standard. The goaltending has been a mixed bag, with the team stealing some games when Montembleault was the best player on the ice, while in some other games, both Montembeault and Primeau have looked vulnerable. It is however on defence, that we have seen the biggest adverse change. This season, the best one could describe the overall mobility of Montreal's defence is: mediocre. We have four defencemen (Savard, Mailloux, Xhekaj and Hutson) who are at best average skaters. Of our four most mobile defencemen (Barron, Guhle, Struble and Matheson), two are injured, one is just returning from an injury and one appears to be playing through an injury. Delete the under appreciated Harris and Kovacevic (who, in terms of mobility, was at least the equal if not more than the noted four average skating defencemen) and one can quickly see why the team has had such trouble exiting our defensive zone.

There is some salvation. I would replace Mailloux with Engstrom, as it is clear to this writer that Mailloux is not yet NHL ready. Hopefully, Guhle and Barron will be able to return shortly. While still an adventure in the defensive zone, Barron has the skating ability to evade the first forechecker and that ability will somewhat mute the effectiveness of opposing teams' forecheck. Lastly, and most importantly, whatever injury is hampering Matheson's top end skating, will pass and we will again see the same player who played such a major role in the team's limited success last season. I cringe to think what our defence would be without Matheson's mobility. So does MSL.

Before the season, I opined that the team's supposed depth in defensive prospects was somewhat illusory. Until I see what Engstrom, Reinbacher and Trudeau can accomplish at the NHL level, my skepticism will remain.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Catanddogguitarrr

Ad

Ad