Pre-Game Talk: Habs vs Kings

Redux91

I do Three bullets.
Sep 5, 2006
46,715
42,949
Kirkland, Montreal
I think it will be extremely difficult for Habs to fire MSL. He is buddies with Hughes
MSL is not going anywhere any time soon.
The only reason he wouldn't last these next 3 years of his contract would be if he stepped down himself, and he won't.

They are building something all-together here, and there is no way they will bring in some other coach with his own agenda right smack in the middle of the brewing process

I don't know who this will upset to hear, but honestly, tough

Who the hell else do you even bring in that won't turn the players off from the good vibes of the current constructing

Marty ain't going anywhere
As our actual team personnel gets more and more upgraded for the better
Then the team will do much better as well
Right now it's all about patience,
Which as we know, the average Hab fan here does not have.
 

HabzSauce

Registered User
Jun 10, 2022
1,647
2,262
MSL is not going anywhere any time soon.
The only reason he wouldn't last these next 3 years of his contract would be if he stepped down himself, and he won't.

They are building something all-together here, and there is no way they will bring in some other coach with his own agenda right smack in the middle of the brewing process

I don't know who this will upset to hear, but honestly, tough

Who the hell else do you even bring in that won't turn the players off from the good vibes of the current constructing

Marty ain't going anywhere
As our actual team personnel gets more and more upgraded for the better
Then the team will do much better as well
Right now it's all about patience,
Which as we know, the average Hab fan here does not have.
Right now I agree he ain't going anywhere
 

Kudo Shinichi

Registered User
Apr 20, 2012
21,138
27,975
That 3rd pairing dmen won't be playing on the top pairing, the top pairing is Hutson/Guhle and it's already better over 200 feet than Matheson/Guhle over the last 3 games where they played quite a bit together.

What is needed is a defensive partner for Barron and/or a defensive partner for Xhekaj. Struble can fit into one of those two spots if he can play RD. But Matheson has shown he can't fill that role each with Barron in the last 3 games. And Savard looks done at this point...

So who's playing on the 2nd pairing?
Barron and Xhekaj haven't looked good so far this season despite playing bottom pairing min, Struble has yet to play a game this season so it remains to be seen how he performs, and you said Savard is done at this point. So none of them should ideally be playing on the top 4 right now. Without Matheson, this team would need 2 more top 4 D, so sounds like horrible idea to trade Matheson.
 

Shred

Registered User
Nov 1, 2005
1,323
830
Any veteran 3-4 D we can find can replace most of his minutes and play way better defense, all for a cheaper price than he's going to want (presumably).
You mean someone like Brett Pesce (6x5.5) or Brady Skjei (7x7)? Zadorov (6x5), Dumba (2x3.75).

Or 34 year old TJ Brodie (2x3.75), 34 year old Chris Tanev (6x4.5), 33 year old OEL (4x3.5)?

These are the most notable D-men I could find who signed this summer. I’m thinking Matheson probably signs in this 6x5 range as well, pro-rated with cap going up.

I think it’s slim pickings overall for reliable defensemen which would be the main reason why we aren’t in a hurry to dispose of Matheson.
 

bsl

Registered User
Oct 9, 2009
10,300
3,579
Do you seriously think finding an RD who can play big minutes on the top pairing and do better than Matheson will be easy to find and not cost much? That's one of the most coveted positions among teams in the league...



If the team is in the mix and battling for a playoff spot next year, Matheson should not be traded even if they don't plan on re-signing him.
They made the same mistake with souray.
 

Hutty

Registered User
Oct 14, 2024
3
5
One day contract with LeClair
What does this mean? The only reason I ask, I moved to L.A in 1996. Always a big fan of Leclair. Picked him in my pools…. Never showed up. One day in Manhattan Beach I see him….. ( a flyer then ) and goes on a tear. Legion of doom……anyways, just wondering what makes you think of Lecair regarding Kings.
 

Habssince89

trolls to the IL
Sponsor
Apr 14, 2009
9,086
4,530
Vancouver, BC
What does this mean? The only reason I ask, I moved to L.A in 1996. Always a big fan of Leclair. Picked him in my pools…. Never showed up. One day in Manhattan Beach I see him….. ( a flyer then ) and goes on a tear. Legion of doom……anyways, just wondering what makes you think of Lecair regarding Kings.
He owned them in the 93 finals
 

morhilane

Registered User
Feb 28, 2021
8,326
10,912
leafs kicking their butt does not look good for tomorrow even though its a "back to back"
I'm betting on the Kings being so pissed they lost again that they will come gun blazing tomorrow.
And the Habs will have eaten too much turkey leftovers and won't skate more than they have so far. Oh and the defence still look discombobulated since didn't even practice that today...
 

Ieatsht4brkfst

Registered User
Mar 22, 2024
97
121
I'm betting on the Kings being so pissed they lost again that they will come gun blazing tomorrow.
And the Habs will have eaten too much turkey leftovers and won't skate more than they have so far. Oh and the defence still look discombobulated since didn't even practice that today...
this game will actually tell a lot about what we have, were coming off a bad game to and if they come out slow again tomorrow and the kings are on fire, it shows theres a problem in preparation, but we will see
 

Skip Bayless

The Skip Bayless Show
Aug 28, 2014
21,506
24,877
7:08pm bro this game is amazing. 4-0 Habs already like gyattt damn.

I thought we was having fun tonight.

Guess not.


d69206221b093293a5bd57c1319f96dd.gif
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad