Voight
#winning
You do realize between Jan 1st and the deadline last season, all of four 2nd round picks were traded? Teams dont just give those away for middling players like the ones in your post.
no Rs fans thinks same on either of theseI personally think the Rangers should pay a 1st for David Savard, and another 1st for Matheson.
So what is LATEST price on BarronHabs need to fix right side of their D in off season. With collapse of Barron, Reinbacher pushed back a year and Mailloux a ?
Yes, Be couple quality veterans acquired. Habs have 20 million coming off books this summer
Savard is done in Montreal at end of season. Big heavy shot blockering right D with a ring usually go for overvalue at deadline. Increases with Montreal retaining.
Asking less what he went for before. Which was a first and third.
No there’s 0 discussion on reinbacher. He’s out until March anyway, and I’m afraid what you’re about to offer for him. He’s a top 5 pick.So what is LATEST price on Barron
and is Reinbacher even a discussion?
Barron we will probably lose to waivers at some point. Been major disappointmentSo what is LATEST price on Barron
and is Reinbacher even a discussion?
Ya I agree on armia any playoff team will love him in the bottom 6.Evans is getting pretty underrated here, but no team in their right mind should trade for Dvorak or Savard.
Armia is a good gamble IMO, he can be a beast in the playoffs and when he's bad it usually isn't all that detrimental to the team.
He's a UFA and might be asking for too much, too long or just wants out.I don't understand exactly why the Habs should trade Evans?
He's a bit older but he's still really freakin' good, for a bottom 6 role
If anything, we should resign him for as cheap as possible, for as many years as possible
There will be better options, cheaper salary wise, for the role he fills. I figure half the value a team gives up for him will go to pass-through retention.Ya I agree on armia any playoff team will love him in the bottom 6.
He's a UFA and might be asking for too much, too long or just wants out.
There will be better options, cheaper salary wise, for the role he fills. I figure half the value a team gives up for him will go to pass-through retention.
Maybe. It's all about fit. Big RW that can protect the puck and kill PK with a scoring touch, at 50% that's pretty good imo.He's a UFA and might be asking for too much, too long or just wants out.
There will be better options, cheaper salary wise, for the role he fills. I figure half the value a team gives up for him will go to pass-through retention.
They excellent on penalty kill. Reason why Montreal pk improved this season.Ya I agree on armia any playoff team will love him in the bottom 6.
Honestly if I were EDM I'd be all over both armia and Evans. Wouldn't cost the farm and together would vastly improve their depth.
It is debatable.I don't understand exactly why the Habs should trade Evans?
He's a bit older but he's still really freakin' good, for a bottom 6 role
If anything, we should resign him for as cheap as possible, for as many years as possible
given the bold, what do you ask?Barron we will probably lose to waivers at some point. Been major disappointment
Reinbacher is out injured. We not moving him, no.
Because he's likely not signing any extensions without the term being at least what he could get as a UFA. If I look at Matt Roy's contract, it could be significant in length enough to make Habs walk away.I don't understand exactly why the Habs should trade Evans?
He's a bit older but he's still really freakin' good, for a bottom 6 role
If anything, we should resign him for as cheap as possible, for as many years as possible
Why would he resign though,Taking Evans out of the conversation because i want the Habs to resign him, i would say we might get a late 2nd (using our last retention spot) and bunch of 3rds for those players
I would probably pay a second for double retention on Armia for the Canucks. Unless we get a bigger fish. If he's on his game hes a good middle 6 player and with his size hes built more for the playoffs and would rather not play against himTaking Evans out of the conversation because i want the Habs to resign him, i would say we might get a late 2nd (using our last retention spot) and bunch of 3rds for those players
No one needs retention on Evans. His $1.7MM cap hit is easy to fit into most team's structures.Habs fans would like to think that Hughes is done being ripped off by MacFarland. He's probably smart enough to realize it too.
I'm not sure you're going to like what Evans will cost at 50% retention. I think it will be more than a low 2nd rounder.
You can have Dvorak for free.
you can have Dvorak for 50% retention for a small return. Mid pick .No one needs retention on Evans. His $1.7MM cap hit is easy to fit into most team's structures.
Dvorak would require 50% retention to have any value. I'd trade something for him at 50% retained.
He’s already stated publicly numerous times, he wants to stay here. He’s only 28 and still in that window of being a productive C for a rebuilding team.Why would he resign though,
1A. He's due for a raise
1B. He'll want his payday contract for his 30s
2. He's an obvious stop gap till the Hab's center prospects are ready
3. When the Hab's are finally playoff ready he will obviously be cast aside.
He's obviously a good depth Center and there will be many teams willing to give him what he wants when he becomes UFhabs have money to resign hhim, and give him the #+ mil
I personally think the Rangers should pay a 1st for David Savard, and another 1st for Matheson.