Dichow Stopper
Former ChuckyToGally
- Aug 9, 2004
- 12,746
- 771
that's fair given the playoffs he had.
Because he is good and that it is his market value...Why on earth do you want to lock in for 4 years at $3.4 million per a guy that only shows up 30% of the time and is invisible the other 70%?
Another idiotic signing that we will end up putting on waivers.
if those 20 in are in the playoffs, then its a cheap dealLol 3.4m for him to be good 20 games.
Too much, Lehky will also get something similar...
Armia's contract is while he's 28 to 31.
Byron's contract was while he was 30 to 33, and just came off a concussion.
No, he is not ...having a good game every blue moon does not make him good.Because he is good and that it is his market value...
No it doesn't, LITR only kicks in at the start of the year, but you can go 10% higher then the cap before that.I assume this doesn’t take into account Weber salary going on the LTIR?
I can live with it, now sign Perry.
LOL. Obviously. The only NHL player that is having good game mostly every game is getting paid 12.5M and would probably command way more on the open market. The rest of nhl players are also streaky as f***..No, he is not ...having a good game every blue moon does not make him good.
Too much, Lehky will also get something similar...
I don't think we sign Perry now...
how many truly consistent players do we have?Lol 3.4m for him to be good 20 games.
Thought that includes Weber so closer to $18M in cap space.
As for Armia, I don't mind it. A little high $ but not terrible if he gets the ice time to show more of what he can do.
So looks like
Drouin - Suzuki - Caufield
Toffoli - KK - Gally
Anderson - Xxxxx - Armia
Lehkonen - Evans - Byron
Paquette