ChesterNimitz
governed by the principle of calculated risk
- Jul 4, 2002
- 5,835
- 12,675
All one has to look at is the great Canadiens teams of the the late 1970s: the Big Three defencemen who were faster than most opposing forwards; a goalie who was one of the best of his era and a bevy of skilled forwards. Was it any wonder they won 4 Cups in a row? And rarely broke a sweat most nights beating every team. But it all started with that trio of exceptionally mobile defencemen. They brought a level of mobility from the back end that no other team could match. Without them, the team, even with Lafleur, Lemaire, Cournoyer, et. al. would never have achieved the success or renown they did.Absolutely bang on Chester! PMD's..............the more you have the better the team seems to be.
Habs are working on this, as we speak......better days ahead.
The Big Three continued the evolution of the game first started with the emergence of Bobby Orr ten years earlier. It worked for Boston in the late 1960s and for successive teams since then, including the current Bruins team. Ask yourself where would the Avalanche be without Makar and Byram? Ask yourself why the Oilers, with two of the most dynamic forwards, have continued to fall short?
In my position, I suggest to my team managers that in their selection process that they choose the three most mobile defencemen; two centers who have the skating ability to control the center of the ice and a competent goaltender. That way, I suggest, regardless of the balance of the roster, we will be competitive.
Now apply my simplistic approach to the current Montreal team and see how close, if I am right, we are to being competitive.
Last edited: