The tricky question is the threshold at which injuries cease being categorized as freak incidents for a given player.
Some players just happen to be more resilient, which evokes the axiom about how health is a skill.
It all seems wishy washy to me. Naturally some people are going to get injured more often than others, we simply can't say every player will experience _ injuries in a career and miss _ games. It is not finite and some players unfortunately have more and some will have less. Some may get injured more because they place themselves in those situations or play a certain way, I'll concede that, but blanketly stating Dach and Guhle are injury
prone is not rooted in any science or logic. They may very well never have a major injury again in their career for all we know.
Dach's latest injury was on a fluke play. The question should be whether his knee will not heal and whether he will be more susceptible to knee issues in the future because of this. Being susceptible to future knee injuries due to permanent structural damage, would make him injury prone in my books. This could actually only be answered by a Doctor. This injury, and his wrist one, shouldn't be used to argue some vague concept that he is made of glass.
Going back to Crosby, who I highlighted earlier. I think concussions are actually a pretty common one that leads to further re-occurrences. It would be a fair statement to make that Crosby is concussion prone. This is a factor when determining his value. Same applied to Lindros. I mean, at the end of the day they are still superstars and worth the risk, but I think you get my point.
Dach has never played a full season
If he’s not injury prone then he has some sort of curse
He's is not injury prone or cursed. He has unfortunately experienced two injuries that any other player could have experienced. Dach unfortunately did. Shit luck.