So you thought this was a cup contending roster this year? Wow...
Not according to both this board and the concensus from media pundits heading into the season.
We are quite further ahead than most predicted... I was one of the few posters here that saw this level as realistic, and even then, I didn't think we'd hold this high if we ran into major injuries to key players.
Right... Because he'll get less out of an improved roster lol
Possible, just not very likely.
Couldn't disagree more.
Again, could not disagree more.
Right... Quick question, how many cups have you won or been a part of?
This is perhaps the worst take you've offered. The comparisons are so off base as to wonder if you've ever actually listened to either Keefe or Boudreau discuss hockey...
You mean last night when the Habs lost to the hottest team in the league that has beat the Caps, Avs & Kings 2x during their current league best run since Feb ... The same Blues team that has scored 5+ goals in 1/4 of their games in hat stretch.
Its one thing to acknowledge context matters, it's another to actually apply it. While personal & emotional preference is what it is (beauty is in the eye of the beholder) your argument is largely incoherent with the ways coaching affects team and sport performance.
Objectively, the Habs have improved in key metrics (points, GF, GA, special teams efficiency), and this despite minimal roster turnover and offseason/in season player acquisition.
We also have one of the youngest rosters in the league (2nd to Buffalo but I believe that includes Price).
Qualitatively, the available information suggests that the roster is very much bought in and aligned with the coaching staff (despite the rebuild process and associated losing).
Coaching is quite clearly a strength for our organization right now. Assuming the tactical and game management decisions will remain static as the roster improves and as the organization pivots out of rebuild focus is.... A very poor assumption.
How well MSL & co. will adapt to being a top roster with high performance pressure and greater scrutiny & preparation from opposing teams, remains to be seen. But there is zero reason to assume the worst, and it's pretty foolish to hold up individual poor game outcomes (while ignoring the full context) as some kind of evidence of coaching inadequacy.