I don't disagree and the healthy roster is in-line with how I figured it would roll out. What confuses me a bit is how Aman is viewed as a centre given he can't win face-offs and Suter is pretty bad at them as well. Raty is a big improvement over both of them while also bringing right-handed face-off ability. If Raty isn't getting into the line-up regularly, then it doesn't make much sense to keep him on the roster. Same goes for Bains.
Grub's Canucks & NHL News, Rumours, and & Fantasy GM | Training Camp Begins
- Thread starter Vector
- Start date
- Status
I don't disagree and the healthy roster is in-line with how I figured it would roll out. What confuses me a bit is how Aman is viewed as a centre given he can't win face-offs and Suter is pretty bad at them as well. Raty is a big improvement over both of them while also bringing right-handed face-off ability. If Raty isn't getting into the line-up regularly, then it doesn't make much sense to keep him on the roster. Same goes for Bains.
TruGr1t
Proper Villain
- Jun 26, 2003
- 24,755
- 9,438
Misc:
-acknowledges the dislike within the fan base for him
-Riccio was surprised by some of the comments on twitter but Seravalli wasn't surprised
-(doesn't seem to understand why Vancouver fans are upset with him)
-Rogers Arena was the loudest building in the playoffs
-returning to Canucks Central every Monday
Canucks:
-not as concerned about the state of Canucks goaltending
-gives all the credit in the world to the Canucks management because of how aggressive they are
-were, at one point in time, were the front runner for Guentzel
-if Tampa doesn't clear cap space, Guentzel ends up in Vancouver
Demko:
-the reason no one has any idea about his injury is because Demko doesn't have a good handle on it
-an injury that causes instability in the knee
-doesn't appear to be a fix to the injury
Lankinen:
-was looking for a different payday in the summer
Blue and Green
Out to lunch
- Dec 17, 2017
- 3,987
- 4,194
Bojack Horvatman
IAMGROOT
- Jun 15, 2016
- 4,571
- 8,377
Yes it would suck, but it’s a good problem to have. Our forward depth was already good, and it’s great to see Raty earn a spot. It’s like losing a good player in the expansion draft. If you’re not worried about losing anyone on waivers than it means your depth probably isn’t good enough.
Josepho
i want the bartkowski thread back
I'm pretty sure Elliotte said that Guentzel only left Carolina because he really liked Tampa, and I'm probably more inclined to believe that.
-will be their regular Friday guest
Miller:
-his absence was purely precautionary
-collided in the scrimmage so just wanted to be extra careful
Pre-Season:
-would be shocked if they don't reduce the number of pre-season games in the next CBA
-would then add two additional regular season games
Blueger:
-slow playing, same as Miller
Raty:
-has had an impressive camp
Canucks Prediction:
-does see a regression
-thinks they are a 100 point team
Canucks Goaltending:
-doesn't feel comfortable prognosticating Demko's situation
-his understanding is that this injury isn't something that can be repaired by surgery
-Lankinen is a smart signing
-doesn't think the Canucks will carry three goalies when all are healthy
Defencemen:
-toss-up between Forbort and Josh Brown over who was the more preplexing defensive signing of the summer
-Forbort was a healthy scratch for a big chunk of last season
-on the whole, Canucks have a top-10 defence core but it's scewed heavily by Hughes
-little premature to have a trade target list
-a few names on the trade block like Nick Robertson
-Flames will have to make a decision on Rasmus Andersson
Swayman:
-huge tactical error for the Bruins to take this public
-organization isn't used to being pushed in negotiations
-have underpaid all their stars
-Bruins wanted 6.5m earlier in the summer
-was told that the latest offer was 8y/7.8m
-believes Swayman asked for 8y/8.5m
-really helpful for a team to have one voice that is speaking for them in reference to Neely's emotions getting the better of him
-mentions this is why Rutherford has taken a step back, publicly, with the Canucks
-made a huge mistake by not taking him to arbitration
Nucker101
Foundational Poster
- Apr 2, 2013
- 21,925
- 17,990
I actually prefer Sprong there, I think he plays faster with the puck on his stick which might get Petey to also do the same, I find Petey just doesn't play fast enough when he's struggling. Both in terms of moving quickly with the puck or just moving the puck off his stick quickly instead.
Just goes to show that sometimes what the coaches see during a long training camp and exhibition schedule, and what fans see, can be poles apart.
From the standpoint of a 'casual observer' Bains hasn't been all that impressive in the pre-season, but he's still standing while PDG ends up on waivers. That leaves Bains, Aman and Raty battling for two of the remaining three depth forward spots.
The betting is still on Aman and Raty, because they're natural centers.
- Aug 28, 2011
- 18,042
- 22,803
It's probably reasonable to think Demko's days are numbered and the Canucks need to seek out a legitimate replacement.
TruGr1t
Proper Villain
- Jun 26, 2003
- 24,755
- 9,438
If this is the case, and who knows, you can look to the draft and hope Silovs/Lankinen proves to be a good tandem.
TruGr1t
Proper Villain
- Jun 26, 2003
- 24,755
- 9,438
This was extremely obvious and it’s weird that people thought that one guy was just totally healthy and not playing in the preseason while every other veteran played 2-3 games already.
It works but unless Joshua is back soon, that puts them at 21/23 with a 0.09m under the cap. At that point you aren't actually gaining any significant capspace through accrual. Might as well just go on LTIR and run with a full roster.
I wonder what it would take to get Andersson. Allvin does seem to have a good trading relationship with Conroy.
Phrasing
Registered User
- Nov 16, 2007
- 4,900
- 3,221
I’m more curious as to what happens when Joshua is back. Does Hoglander take Sprong’s spot? Does he move down to the 4th?
Also, to me it’s clear Raty should develop in the NHL this year. How he fits with a full roster requires Canucks losing another player. Without that, he will be in the AHL.
Dana Murzyn
Registered User
- Oct 5, 2005
- 1,723
- 392
This is kind of a big deal. And a terrible, terrible idea.
I didn't include it but Sekeres, Price, and Seravalli are all against this idea. The issue, according to the NHL and NHLAPA, is that just taking games away lowers the revenue whether they are pre-season or regular season.
go to a 28 game preseason and 60 game regular season imo
Billy Kvcmu
Registered User
- Status
