So if you're a million under all season till the deadline you can fit in 3.5 million. How much is 3.5 at the deadline in start of the year cap hit? If you know what I mean.tl;dr: for every dollar you don't spend pre-deadline you can spend about $3.50 at the deadline on a player
I don’t have an issue with your first statement but I’m not sure what purpose it serves typing out the same list over and over again periodically over a span of 3.5 months. And that’s a bad list.Hats off to the playoff warriors, you will not be forgotten.
Playoff performance rankings..
1. Miller
2. Boeser
3. Garland
4. Lindholm
5. Zadorov
7. Myers
8. Soucy
9. Joshua
10. Suter
11. Silovs
12. Hughes
12. Blueger
13. Hronek
14. Hoglander
15. Di Giuseppe
16. Pettersson
17. Cole
18. Aman
19. Lafferty
20. Mikheyev
That’s certainly a list. Silovs with a .881 save percentage was a great story but he was not better than Hughes and others.Hats off to the playoff warriors, you will not be forgotten.
Playoff performance rankings..
1. Miller
2. Boeser
3. Garland
4. Lindholm
5. Zadorov
7. Myers
8. Soucy
9. Joshua
10. Suter
11. Silovs
12. Hughes
12. Blueger
13. Hronek
14. Hoglander
15. Di Giuseppe
16. Pettersson
17. Cole
18. Aman
19. Lafferty
20. Mikheyev
That might mean you are on timeout. Vector rules with an iron fist these daysSilly question but how do you like posts? Don’t see an option anywhere.
Lol I see, can’t tame 44That might mean you are on timeout. Vector rules with an iron fist these days
Y2Canucks was right after all -- Crosby never really wanted to win a cup.
It's going to be really interesting to see the PDO vs Tocchet system battle play out. IIRC Data models that track actual possession of the puck had the Canucks as a top 5 team at 5v5 in offensive zone puck possession, Tocchet coached the team to hold onto pucks instead of firing shots so in theory that should lead to a higher sh% assuming the team held onto pucks for higher quality shots(traffic in front). This also meant less rushed shots when entering the zone so there would be fewer pond hockey moments where the other team could counter attack.Once again the Canucks are the NHL's version of Rodney Dangerfield--no respect. The Sportsnet Pacific Division preview is out, and they have the Canucks not only finishing behind Edmonton, but even behind Vegas.
In the writer's assessment, what the Canucks accomplished last season is 'unsustainable' and they're the major 'regression pick' around the entire NHL. But best the enter the season with a chip on your shoulder, I guess.
It's not as if the media 'talking heads' are never wrong.
it's ok, we'll prove them wrong and then shove it up their ass and remind them about it.Once again the Canucks are the NHL's version of Rodney Dangerfield--no respect. The Sportsnet Pacific Division preview is out, and they have the Canucks not only finishing behind Edmonton, but even behind Vegas.
In the writer's assessment, what the Canucks accomplished last season is 'unsustainable' and they're the major 'regression pick' around the entire NHL. But best the enter the season with a chip on your shoulder, I guess.
It's not as if the media 'talking heads' are never wrong.
Silly question but how do you like posts? Don’t see an option anywhere.
That might mean you are on timeout. Vector rules with an iron fist these days
Actually, my 'regression pick' in the Pacific is the vaunted Oilers. Looking like they might have to start the season without Kane and Nurse.it's ok, we'll prove them wrong and then shove it up their ass and remind them about it.
I really don’t think this is a terrible opinion they have the Canucks third. Not out of the realm of possibilities. There is clear top 3 in pacific division, and then everyone else. I don’t find this disrespectful. Putting the Canucks behind the Kraken and Kings would be disrespectful.Once again the Canucks are the NHL's version of Rodney Dangerfield--no respect. The Sportsnet Pacific Division preview is out, and they have the Canucks not only finishing behind Edmonton, but even behind Vegas.
In the writer's assessment, what the Canucks accomplished last season is 'unsustainable' and they're the major 'regression pick' around the entire NHL. But best the enter the season with a chip on your shoulder, I guess.
It's not as if the media 'talking heads' are never wrong.
Looking like they might have to start the season without Kane and Nurse.