Trying to come up with a comparable situation where a highly drafted prospect ends up in total limbo like this (not able to get opportunity in NHL, not playing full time in AHL), with clear disagreements between player/agent and team on where they should be, where the player gets moved to another opportunity and then they go on to reach their potential. Just seems like it's usually a big hit for the player's value as their development gets hampered so early into their post draft career.
Grub's Canucks & NHL News, Rumours, and & Fantasy GM | Looking for a D-Man to Save Us
- Thread starter Mr. Canucklehead
- Start date
Trying to come up with a comparable situation where a highly drafted prospect ends up in total limbo like this (not able to get opportunity in NHL, not playing full time in AHL), with clear disagreements between player/agent and team on where they should be, where the player gets moved to another opportunity and then they go on to reach their potential. Just seems like it's usually a big hit for the player's value as their development gets hampered so early into their post draft career.
Nope no joke, Jiricek isn’t on the same level as some of the promising prospects coming up, I’d rate Willander higher than him, his value is sinking, I wouldn’t give up on him if he were a Canuck but look how fast the Brannstroms, Lundqvist and Fabbros. values drop off so fast
Jiricek is nothing more than a high drafted who has top 4 projection, not looking like top pairing
One mismanaged year of development from both team and Player/Agent view can mess up a guys development. Should have been in the A longer last season once the team saw his warts in his game.
Jiricek and his agent should understand that Jarmo is gone. So him being a former first means little to Waddle. And if dealt that 6OA draft status won’t mean much to another club if he doesn’t produce. That draft status buys you time with your GM and team, but once that person is gone, no one is on the hook for you.
Jiricek and his agent should understand that Jarmo is gone. So him being a former first means little to Waddle. And if dealt that 6OA draft status won’t mean much to another club if he doesn’t produce. That draft status buys you time with your GM and team, but once that person is gone, no one is on the hook for you.
During his draft year I remember seeing a pretty long-length interview with Mateychuk and the kid at age 17 came across better than most 10 year NHL vets. Smart guy. Not surprised he’s doing well and is making the most of his talent.
Just A Bit Outside
Playoffs??!
- Mar 6, 2010
- 17,845
- 17,621
Does something around the Nucks 2025 1st get it done for Jiricek?
Doubtful as his services will be highly valued.
Maybe throw Hoglander into the mix for the deal.
Doubtful as his services will be highly valued.
Maybe throw Hoglander into the mix for the deal.
Peen
Rejoicing in a Benning-free world
- Oct 6, 2013
- 31,608
- 27,945
Hoglander alone isn’t going to make up the money portion unless they’re only making like one trade before the deadline.
If they want to make multiple moves, there will have to be outgoing salary.
Vector outlined it already -> Hoglander + cheaper contract for a defense upgrade now allows you to keep accruing the capspace (5-5.5M around the TDL) necessary to make a deal without having to send a bigger contract out.
Kind of depends on the attitude of Jiricek. If he has the right attitude might be worth it but he has to accept playing in the A and working in his warts to the satisfaction of the Manny before he’d get a call up.
Right now, hard to say.
Right now, hard to say.
VIPettersson
Registered User
- Apr 9, 2018
- 636
- 600
Feel like Hoglander + 2025 1st is too much for Jiricek's current value. Would definitely do Hoglander + something else though. Loved Jiricek during his draft year liked him more than Nemec.
Id honestly claim him. Would be nice on the 4th line/13F. Probably send one of Bains/Raty/Sasson back down.
I’m sure Demko wouldn’t mind having his BFF back.
I'm very much in the "address the defense problem first" camp, but I'd be curious if Utah would be open to a Hoglander+ for Crouse swap with some salary retention.
Crouse has fallen off hard this season and maybe could use a change of scenery. Obviously much bigger and better defensively than Hogs.
Crouse has fallen off hard this season and maybe could use a change of scenery. Obviously much bigger and better defensively than Hogs.
Joshua makes Crouse “redundant” tbh. Probably better to use that cap space for more of a needle mover.
While I like the idea, I don’t know if there’s a way to structure a deal to make his contract palatable for this season nor any reason for Utah to sell him when his value is at the lowest.
Lindgren
Registered User
- Jun 30, 2005
- 6,389
- 4,492
We saw last night that Hronek could drive a great second pair. Who could the Canucks find who would make a good bargain partner for Hughes—a guy with decent-but-not-great wheels, good defensive IQ, not a point producer and so not a high cap hit.
Put Hughes and Hronek together when the team needs to get a late goal. Otherwise, create two terrific pairs. Did Anaheim do something like that with Niedermayer and Pronger?
Put Hughes and Hronek together when the team needs to get a late goal. Otherwise, create two terrific pairs. Did Anaheim do something like that with Niedermayer and Pronger?
Ad
Latest posts
-
-
Speculation: Roster Building Thread - Part XIII (Nanaki edition)
- Latest: Flan the incredible
-
OT: Around the NHL: Cup or bust for the Leafs and Oilers? Bust it is!- Latest: BusinessGoose
-
