Grub's Canucks & NHL News, Rumours, and & Fantasy GM | Looking for a D-Man to Save Us

mriswith

Registered User
Oct 12, 2011
4,517
8,212
39% xgoals %, that graph doesn't say what that guy thinks it says lmao.

i thought adam foote is in charge of the d pairings? very questionable indeed if those two are always on the ice together. too bad you cant move myers now because he lives in kelowna in the offseason.
I initially thought the same and that we were stuck with Myers as well because he will never waive his nmc, but I've since realized his buyout is relatively painless.

I think a trade package around Hoglander lands Jiricek.

Hoglander is talented, but doesn't fit our system. I think on a team like Columbus he scores 25+ quite easily.
Maybe if you add Lekk+ to Hog it'd have a chance
 

LemonSauceD

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 31, 2015
8,164
13,907
Vancouver
I don’t really get this Jiricek talk.

1. We have Willander.
2. We have Hronek.
3. Willander’s skating and defensive potential > Jiricek’s 5 on 5 liability concerns, poorer skater, and PP needs.

Jiricek’s potential as a big guy with offensive ability is nice, but unless we part ways with Hronek who’s basically developed as a top pair defenseman under us or we abandon Willander’s potential as an elite skating defensive backend, there’s no realistic succession for Jiricek here. And right now he doesn’t move the needle for us.

I used to be high on him, but his lack of growth defensively coupled with some grave concerns of his 5 on 5 game and entitlement issues is quite frankly off putting.

On the flip side, there’s zero chance Columbus lets him go for anything less than a 1st round pick and a solid prospect.
 

Leif Rohlin

Registered User
Jan 25, 2024
116
222
I don’t really get this Jiricek talk.

1. We have Willander.
2. We have Hronek.
3. Willander’s skating and defensive potential > Jiricek’s 5 on 5 liability concerns, poorer skater, and PP needs.

Jiricek’s potential as a big guy with offensive ability is nice, but unless we part ways with Hronek who’s basically developed as a top pair defenseman under us or we abandon Willander’s potential as an elite skating defensive backend, there’s no realistic succession for Jiricek here. And right now he doesn’t move the needle for us.

I used to be high on him, but his lack of growth defensively coupled with some grave concerns of his 5 on 5 game and entitlement issues is quite frankly off putting.

There’s also zero chance Columbus lets him go for anything less than 1st round pick and a solid prospect.
I'm always wary of the good player on a bad team... and he's on a bad team and hasn't even been a good player for them. Would not touch unless it was just to flip him for a better asset.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LemonSauceD

theguardianII

Registered User
Jan 30, 2020
3,724
1,873
I don’t really get this Jiricek talk.

1. We have Willander.
2. We have Hronek.
3. Willander’s skating and defensive potential > Jiricek’s 5 on 5 liability concerns, poorer skater, and PP needs.

Jiricek’s potential as a big guy with offensive ability is nice, but unless we part ways with Hronek who’s basically developed as a top pair defenseman under us or we abandon Willander’s potential as an elite skating defensive backend, there’s no realistic succession for Jiricek here. And right now he doesn’t move the needle for us.

I used to be high on him, but his lack of growth defensively coupled with some grave concerns of his 5 on 5 game and entitlement issues is quite frankly off putting.

On the flip side, there’s zero chance Columbus lets him go for anything less than a 1st round pick and a solid prospect.
A bit of disagreement.

Willander hasn't signed yet, a and then it could be a couple of years needed for seasoning so it might be three years before he is seasoned enough. He might follow Jiricek' progress line.

Jiricek is now and might help THIS team immediately and for a decade if he is any good.

Not many fans/posters think that re-signing Hughes here is not a forgone conclusion but in the couch session skit with him they pointed out how tight his family is and that they all live together, with his brothers so there could be a real possibility of him leaving so having a potential immediate replacement already here and still subject to cap control may be smart. (There is also that snipped out interview comment by him right after his youngest brother was drafted about he can't wait until they all can play together, seen live then edited out)

Like Lekkerimaki, Tocchet has an aversion to younger inexperienced players, that assumes Tocchet will still be here

I remember Juloevi was going to be "Willander" that was a flop but Willander might not be as good as the hype.

It's obvious management wants a WIN NOW team, pretty much at all costs Jiricek at least looks a little to the future and right now.

During Benning's time here the team had loads or "promising prospects" but almost none played a single NHL game, but there was the hype for hope.

I do think both Lekkerimaki and Willander will play in the NHL but maybe not for Tocchet right away.

Jiricek is also buried behind some big contracts as well so not much NHL icetime. Broberg was buried that way as well and he has been a pleasant surprise for St Louis.
 

ManVanFan

Registered User
Mar 28, 2024
865
843
I'm always wary of the good player on a bad team... and he's on a bad team and hasn't even been a good player for them. Would not touch unless it was just to flip him for a better asset.
He seems to also have character issues obviously. Sighting that because others get to play in the NHL and he thinks he's just as good as the reason why. I can see something of a McGroaty-Yager type trade going on with another team.
 

JanBulisPiggyBack

Registered User
Dec 31, 2011
3,868
2,765
Honestly Jiricek for Hoglander isn’t all that far off, we have a young 20 goal scorer who isn’t seeing a tonne of PP time or top line minutes, most of his goals were even strength
We are adding but both Lekk and Willander IMO hold more value
Hoglander and EP 2 would be fair
 

SelltheTeamFrancesco

Registered User
Aug 11, 2015
4,586
4,907
Honestly Jiricek for Hoglander isn’t all that far off, we have a young 20 goal scorer who isn’t seeing a tonne of PP time or top line minutes, most of his goals were even strength
We are adding but both Lekk and Willander IMO hold more value
Hoglander and EP 2 would be fair
Yes it is. Is this a joke. Big right handed defender that has put up really good stats in the AHL, for a small diminutive winger who the heck would make that trade. Are you trading Willander for Hoglander. They drafted him 6th overall in 2022.
 

timw33

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Nov 18, 2007
26,151
20,913
Victoria
Yes it is. Is this a joke. Big right handed defender that has put up really good stats in the AHL, for a small diminutive winger who the heck would make that trade. Are you trading Willander for Hoglander. They drafted him 6th overall in 2022.

Good offensive numbers, yes. Really underwhelming to bad defensive numbers in the AHL.

His footspeed and general mobility is a big problem.
 

Pastor Of Muppetz

Registered User
Oct 1, 2017
26,400
16,374
A bit of disagreement.

Willander hasn't signed yet, a and then it could be a couple of years needed for seasoning so it might be three years before he is seasoned enough. He might follow Jiricek' progress line.

Jiricek is now and might help THIS team immediately and for a decade if he is any good.

Not many fans/posters think that re-signing Hughes here is not a forgone conclusion but in the couch session skit with him they pointed out how tight his family is and that they all live together, with his brothers so there could be a real possibility of him leaving so having a potential immediate replacement already here and still subject to cap control may be smart. (There is also that snipped out interview comment by him right after his youngest brother was drafted about he can't wait until they all can play together, seen live then edited out)

Like Lekkerimaki, Tocchet has an aversion to younger inexperienced players, that assumes Tocchet will still be here

I remember Juloevi was going to be "Willander" that was a flop but Willander might not be as good as the hype.

It's obvious management wants a WIN NOW team, pretty much at all costs Jiricek at least looks a little to the future and right now.

During Benning's time here the team had loads or "promising prospects" but almost none played a single NHL game, but there was the hype for hope.

I do think both Lekkerimaki and Willander will play in the NHL but maybe not for Tocchet right away.

Jiricek is also buried behind some big contracts as well so not much NHL icetime. Broberg was buried that way as well and he has been a pleasant surprise for St Louis.
I think it's safe to assume that every Canuck coach in the last 30 years has had an aversion to playing younger, inexperienced players...and then get blamed for stunting their careers.

Hughes might not re-sign, Willander might suck, and take years to become an NHL player..?

What's with all the fear/ doomsaying based posting..Pretty soon you'll be posting that the players are 'eating the cats, eating the dogs..'.
 

VanillaCoke

Registered User
Oct 30, 2013
26,316
13,013
They're not going to trade Desharnais already let that one go, they knew he was a project which is why he got multiple years.

He hasn't even played two seasons of nhl games yet, give him and the organization/coaches time to get settled, developed, video, practices, game reps etc.

For context brannstrom has a hundred and twenty more nhl games played than Desharnais ..
 

sting101

Registered User
Feb 8, 2012
16,835
16,158
How is that going to work cap wise? Retention?

Isn't that a negative value package (except for the pick)?
Depends when they make the deal. I would think it's not happening until Xmas at the earliest so by then the cap space could off set. Could also send Brannstrom or Forbort if they want a expiring contract
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad