Diablo2020
Registered User
Look, I've been saying since Allvin took over that the Canucks really don't have much of a shot at being a true contender - which is why I was more pro "reset/rebuild" when Allvin took over. But with the moves Allvin has made, he gave the Canucks a small (but real) chance of being a team that could make noise. Not a true contender, but a team that could go on a run if they get all the breaks. I was in favour of "going for it" last season because I thought that last season was likely their best chance at a Cup in the Quinn Hughes window. Demko getting injured dashed that, though.
But let's be real. You don't want a contender "every year for the next decade". What you're advocating for, in the best case, is a complete rebuild. They will have no high-end players and lose their MVP calibre captain. They won't be a contender for at least 5+ years. Probably closer to a decade. That's the bull case. The bear case is you doom the team to being the next Buffalo, just in a perpetual retool/rebuild but forever circling the drain.
100%. If you trade both you are admitting you are entering a full rebuild. There will be no hopes of being competitive for at least 5 years. Might as well trade Quinn before he walks to NJ in that scenario.
Normally when you trade away your starter, the hockey gods didnt gift you a new one beforehand.
Normally when you trade away your best sniper before you give him a ungoldy 8x8 type deal, you dont have Lekkerimaki basically NHL ready.
I dont see 2027 picks coming back for Petey, I see Mason McTavish types.
With all that capspace alone available, plus the allure of Vancouver the city and having Huggy still, there IS a world were WE are the NYR trading everyone then having one of the best UFA sign with us for a huge overpay.
Rantanen, McTavish, Lankinen, plus a haul for Petey, Miller and Boeser and were better off IMO and back to a real window starting next year.