Grub's Canucks & NHL News, Rumours, and & Fantasy GM | It's All Gone Pete Tong

Orr4Norris

Registered User
Mar 2, 2018
883
1,044
Anything with Zib is a no.

A deal with NYR starts with Laf based on what we know about mgmt.
Interesting. For the record I’d prefer they go with a couple of younger pieces that can grow with the team. I honestly don’t think that’s how this management team will see it.
 

ManVanFan

Registered User
Mar 28, 2024
1,289
1,173
I despise bullies ((and that may be clouding my judgement) but it irks me that bullying that has gone on since at least 2021-2022 has been allowed to continue and the suggested solution is for EP to either just suck it up and/or grow up. It seems like classic victim blaming. Need to bring back Luke Schenn to tell JT to just back off.
MY wife does say it is bullying but call it JT Miller wanting to win and knows that he needs Petey to do that, so JT is hard on Petey in an attempt to push him to greatness. What JT probably doesn't understand is that it's not effective on all people.
 

Canucker

Go Hawks!
Oct 5, 2002
25,964
5,137
Oak Point, Texas
I don't think they are not acting like professionals. Allvin's comments were that they basically want Petey to be more like Hughes. Be consistent and answer when things aren't great.

Unless Petey is saying "I'm not doing that" then I don't see a real problem. Everybody matures in a different way and at different rates. Hell some people never mature. I work with a guy who's a decade older than me, if he doesn't like what I tell him, he will try to stop talking to me. He's almost 50.

I (like everyone else in here) don't really know what any of them are doing, or not doing (other than being successful at their jobs currently), so I don't know if this is legit beef, or if it's just soft annoyance thats been blown out of proportion...I'm sure Tocchet and his staff have a handle on who is who, and who may, or may not be a problem child. It will likely get worked out one way or another, if it turns out it needs to be....I'm still not convinced the problem is large enough to warrant a split.
 

supercanuck

Registered User
Mar 2, 2016
2,974
3,735
MY wife does say it is bullying but call it JT Miller wanting to win and knows that he needs Petey to do that, so JT is hard on Petey in an attempt to push him to greatness. What JT probably doesn't understand is that it's not effective on all people.

I do see that point of view but it's been going on for 4 years and it has not worked, and now has seemingly pushed this team to the edge of a cliff. Two other teams saw the question marks with JT and cut him loose, but Vancouver has ignored the bullying, hired the perfect coach for him, and put him on a pedestal.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Metal Tattooist 71

ManVanFan

Registered User
Mar 28, 2024
1,289
1,173
I (like everyone else in here) don't really know what any of them are doing, or not doing (other than being successful at their jobs currently), so I don't know if this is legit beef, or if it's just soft annoyance thats been blown out of proportion...I'm sure Tocchet and his staff have a handle on who is who, and who may, or may not be a problem child. It will likely get worked out one way or another, if it turns out it needs to be....I'm still not convinced the problem is large enough to warrant a split.
If it comes down to something like Buff throwing Kane's suit in the showers. Yeah maybe a split is coming. 😆
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Canucker

ManVanFan

Registered User
Mar 28, 2024
1,289
1,173
I do see that point of view but it's been going on for 4 years and it has not worked, and now has seemingly pushed this team to the edge of a cliff. Two other teams saw the question marks with JT and cut him loose, but Vancouver has ignored the bullying, hired the perfect coach for him, and put him on a pedestal.
Tocchet brought in to "rein" in Miller. Instead they became besties it seems.... has worked though. Tocchet's style is much more suited to Miller than Petey. Tocchet is too Tort's for me. Tort's has clashed with a lot of players over the years. You could probably find a coach with a strong structure that would work for all players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: supercanuck

Vector

Moderator
Feb 2, 2007
28,993
50,845
Junktown
Tocchet brought in to "rein" in Miller. Instead they became besties it seems.... has worked though. Tocchet's style is much more suited to Miller than Petey. Tocchet is too Tort's for me. Tort's has clashed with a lot of players over the years. You could probably find a coach with a strong structure that would work for all players.

Why do you have a thing that no one ever said in quotes?
 

Pastor Of Muppetz

Registered User
Oct 1, 2017
26,482
16,449
I do see that point of view but it's been going on for 4 years and it has not worked, and now has seemingly pushed this team to the edge of a cliff. Two other teams saw the question marks with JT and cut him loose, but Vancouver has ignored the bullying, hired the perfect coach for him, and put him on a pedestal.
Miller had some maturation issues with NYR, but he wasn't cut loose from Tampa because of behavioural issues..so you're pushing a false narrative there.

Are some of the underachieving big stars on the team being held accountable for demonstrating a lack of heart and passion..It obviously eats Miller up, Tochet was the same way when he was a player.
 

Just A Bit Outside

Playoffs??!
Mar 6, 2010
18,354
18,466
I can understand mgmt asking for Laf.

But would be idiotic if they are not interested in KAM.

Only way that makes sense if they are hung up on getting Schneider.
 

Tinhorn1

Registered User
Aug 7, 2007
1,193
535
I do see that point of view but it's been going on for 4 years and it has not worked, and now has seemingly pushed this team to the edge of a cliff. Two other teams saw the question marks with JT and cut him loose, but Vancouver has ignored the bullying, hired the perfect coach for him, and put him on a pedestal.
It's easy to slip from hearing reports of someone badgering someone else and leaping to the word "bullying," but I don't think we can really put that label on it with any certainty. Picking your post at random, but I'm seeing that word used more and more on here. It's kind of a subjective term. I seriously doubt Pettersson would be throwing around a term like that, so I don't know why we should. Again, despite some information leaking out, we really have no idea what it's really like in that room, much less what it's like in Pettersson's head. The information has been somewhat contradictory, to boot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Metal Tattooist 71

ManVanFan

Registered User
Mar 28, 2024
1,289
1,173
Why do you have a thing that no one ever said in quotes?
I know it keeps changing it on me and I just am not noticing.

Here's your quote, from a CA article.
A lot of noise was made about how Tocchet was being brought in to, among other things, reign in a volatile J.T. Miller defensively.
 

ManVanFan

Registered User
Mar 28, 2024
1,289
1,173
Also from an old article.

“It’s going to be tough because there’s a lot to sort out, but once you gain some traction, that market will change. I was told on my first day by Marc and Brian Burke when I came to Vancouver that it’s the toughest place you’ll ever work, but it’s also the best place you’ll ever work. “I’ll never forget that.”

There was a debate the other day about Van being a tough market.
 
  • Like
Reactions: thefeebster

vadim sharifijanov

Registered User
Oct 10, 2007
30,018
18,414
ya think? i could fully see allvin/jr pull a philly richards/carter haha; probably not in-season, but at the draft before petey's nmc kicks in isn't out of the question

send miller wherever he wants to go first, take a bit of a hit with the nmc but land a u25 future core piece.

then start a bidding war on pettersson with the fully believable narrative that you don't have to move him and that lowballing won't work

this is the only scenario i’ve seen so far that actually appeals to me

farfetched, but damn. philly got an A-/B+ roster player and a high level guy ready to contribute on an ELC for each of carter and richards. can you imagine subtracting petey and miller from this team, but adding young voracek and wayne simmonds on the cusp of breaking out, and rookie brayden schenn and sean couturier?

then we could spend the rest of the offseason reinvesting the forward glut into our blueline.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vancityluongo

arttk

Registered User
Feb 16, 2006
19,707
11,720
Los Angeles
I don't consider not being able to get along with a co-worker as a "mental issue"...these are well paid professionals, if they need assistance with their mental health there is a program for that given by the NHLPA.



I don't disagree there, but the medical staff shouldn't be scapegoated because some players want to live the machismo life...ultimately if they can't find a reason to keep a player out, and the player says they are fine to play...what do you do? Force them to sit because you have a hunch they are faking being fine?
The medical staff has been sus, it’s not just one instance.
Mik, Peter, Hronek, Hughes and Miller.
 

Vector

Moderator
Feb 2, 2007
28,993
50,845
Junktown


Here's Rick Dhaliwal's interview with Kypreos and Bourne where he mentions the Canucks didn't have much interest in K'Andre Miller in the past.

Pettersson & Miller
  • Goes back as far as when Travis Green was coach
  • The media didn’t start this round of rumours, it was Allvin
  • 3 months into a mega-deal and they are already threatening him with a trade
  • Allvin’s comments are meant to be a wake-up call to Pettersson but also
  • a a message to the rest of the NHL to get more offers in-case they move him
  • Sometimes he expect the Canucks expect Pettersson to act like Sidney Crosby when it comes to work ethic and practice habits
  • Was told about the 4 Nations Tournament that the Americans need someone like Miller to face the Canadians
  • Teams were calling Miller about when he was on his leave of absence and the Canucks told his agent they were receiving calls; was made clear that Miller wasn’t going to ask for a trade
  • If the Canucks decide to move Miller, it will be their decision not Miller’s
Canucks in the Trade Market
  • Chatter around the Canucks is very very high
  • One team told Dhaliwal they are checking in on Vancouver just to see who’s available
  • Canucks are listening to everyone who calls
  • Not sure that a decision has been made to move either Miller or
Pettersson
  • Someone told him that it would make more sense for the Canucks to trade one of them in the off-season
  • One person close to the situation told him it is clearly becoming a distraction for the Canucks
Canucks & Rangers
  • Had discussed Miller in years past
  • Canucks have asked for Alexis Lafreniere and Braden Schneider before
  • Had not been interested in K’Andre Miller but doesn’t know if that’s the same now, things could have changed
Trade Targets
  • Looking for a top-4 defenceman but they are expensive
  • Rutherford can strike at any time
  • Penguins want a 1st round pick for Marcus Pettersson and the Canucks, not in a good position, don’t want to trade theirs yet
Brad Richardson
  • Only played 17 games in 2021 with Miller & Pettersson and he could feel the tension
 

dez

Registered User
Mar 3, 2012
1,774
1,620
PA is smart, You don't ask for the piece you want, you ask for there big fish, someone who they probably won't move, only to 'settle' on someone you want, KAM in this case.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Vector

krutovsdonut

eeyore
Sep 25, 2016
17,737
10,483
I can understand mgmt asking for Laf.

But would be idiotic if they are not interested in KAM.

Only way that makes sense if they are hung up on getting Schneider.
kam fills no holes. they have hughes, soucy for at least one more year and three promising left handed dmen in the pipeline. kam is also a pending rfa and needs to be qualified at $4m.

schneider otoh replaces desharnais at the same salary next year as well and leapfrogs myers and juulsen.

when you consider we have $5.5m in buyout penalty next season it's not even close to which they should target.
 

Just A Bit Outside

Playoffs??!
Mar 6, 2010
18,354
18,466
kam fills no holes. they have hughes, soucy for at least one more year and three promising left handed dmen in the pipeline. kam is also a pending rfa and needs to be qualified at $4m.

schneider otoh replaces desharnais at the same salary next year as well and leapfrogs myers and juulsen.

when you consider we have $5.5m in l buyoiut penalty next season it's not even close to which they should target.
Soucy is a 3rd pair dman who can play 2nd line minutes in a pinch.

Kud and EP2 are nowhere near Top 4 capable at the NHL atm.

Willander could potentially jump into Top 4 minutes on the right side as early as next year.

KAM can easily slot into 2nd pairing as LHD immediately.

His value is also likely a good bit lower than it used to be.

I also think the Rags value Schneider more than KAM.
 

krutovsdonut

eeyore
Sep 25, 2016
17,737
10,483
my pie in the sky conspiracy theory of the day is the canucks will see if a deal can be done with boeser and if they can't they will talk to the rangers about boeser and miller.

the rangers obviously want to move out either kreider or zib. canucks can't do that in a miller trade and also take on lafreniere's new deal next season unless they walk from boeser so why not trade him now?

the rangers then get the shakeup they want but will have to add significantly to the pot to pay for boeser and miller.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad