Grub's Canucks & NHL News, Rumours, and & Fantasy GM | Hockey Starts Now

Just A Bit Outside

Playoffs??!
Mar 6, 2010
17,556
17,201
Spent some time identifying defencemen that will probably be on the market. Started out by figuring out the teams that are pretty much sure fire sellers: Canadiens, Blue Jackets, Flyers, Blackhawks, Ducks, Sharks, and Sabres*.

I think the Sabres will make some sort of panic move if this season continues to go sideways. They could turn it around enough to finish the same they have the last couple of seasons but will still end up selling someone off.

From these teams, we've got a list of defencemen sorted into 1st pair, 2nd pair, 3rd pair, depth, and a bonus category.

1st Pair:
Travis Sanheim - Flyers - LD - 7y/6.25m (NTC)

2nd Pair:
Cam Fowler - Ducks - LD - 2y/6.5m (4-NTC)
Henri Jokiharju - Sabres - RD - 1y/3.1m (UFA)
Mattias Samuelsson - Sabres - LD - 6y/4.28m
Connor Murphy - Blackhawks - RD - 2y/4.4m (10-NTC)
Ivan Provorv - Blue Jackets - LD - 1y/4.72m (UFA)
Michael Matheson - Canadiens - LD - 2y/4.87m (8-NTC)
David Savard - Canadiens - RD - 1y/3.5m (UFA)
Mario Ferraro - Sharks - LD - 2y/3.25m
Jake Walman - Sharks - LD - 2y/3.4m

3rd Pair:
Brian Dumoulin - Ducks - LD - 1y/3.15m (10-NTC)
Connor Clifton - Sabres - RD - 2y/3.33m
Alec Martinez - Blackhawks - LD - 1y/4.0m (UFA) injured
T.J. Brodie - Blackhawks - LD - 2y/3.75m
Rasmus Ristolainen - Flyers - RD - 3y/5.1m
Jan Rutta - Sharks - RD - 1y/2.75m (UFA)
Cody Ceci - Sharks - RD - 1y/3.25m (UFA)
Matt Benning - Sharks - RD - 2y/1.25m

Depth:
Jack Johnson - Blue Jackets - LD - 1y/0.77m (UFA)
Erik Johnson - Flyers - RD - 1y/1.0m (UFA)

No Chance:
Erik Gudbranson - Blue Jackets - RD - 2y/4.0m (10-NTC) injured

There's also a few players who could be potential Hronek's. This list is much smaller.

Arber Xhekaj - Canadiens - LD - 2y/1.3m (RFA)
Yegor Zamula - Flyers - LD - 2y/1.7m (RFA)
Bowen Byram - Sabres - LD - 1y/3.85m (RFA)
Urho Vaakanainen - Ducks - LD - 1y/1.5m (RFA)



Quibble about whether a player is a 2nd or 3rd pairing guy all you want. Ideally the Canucks approach their other pairing like they did last year where the non-Hughes/Hronek pairs were hybrid 2/3s that traded off on duties every other game.

I don't see the Flyers actually trading Sanheim.

I think the Sabres will make some sort of panic move if this season continues to go sideways. They could turn it around enough to finish the same they have the last couple of seasons but will still end up selling someone off. I wouldn't have put Mattias Samuelsson on here but Satiar Shah brought him up yesterday. His reasoning is the Sabres have him on the 3rd pair with Dahlin, Byram, & Power above him and unlikely to want an all-left handed top-4. I really don't see them trading Byram, especially considering the Canucks won't be offering anything more than picks and prospects.

I don't think the Sharks will trade all of Ferraro, Walman, and Benning I do think one of them will get moved this season. I view both depth Johnsons as worse than the options already on the roster. The real interesting acquisitions (Gavrikov, Pettersson, etc.) are on these bubble teams that will wait as long as possible to figure out where they stand.


The issue with trading with Buffalo, in any respect, is what exactly goes the other way?

There's is almost nothing that makes sense regarding what the Nucks could give up that would be of interest to them.

Blame the coaching all you want, the players are still the players.

They need a culture changing deal.

That's not happening with Van.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vector

God

Free Citizen
Apr 2, 2007
10,656
8,255
Vancouver
Samuelsson makes sense as the odd one out but I wonder if Byram is unhappy there given that he seemed to hate the culture in Buffalo upon arrival, which to date doesn't seem to have changed.
 

Vector

Moderator
Feb 2, 2007
27,067
45,561
Junktown
The issue with trading with Buffalo, in any respect, is what exactly goes the other way?

There's is almost nothing that makes sense regarding what the Nucks could give up that would be of interest to them.

Blame the coaching all you want, the players are still the players.

They need a culture changing deal.

That's not happening with Van.

I agree! Which I said in my post.

“I really don't see them trading Byram, especially considering the Canucks won't be offering anything more than picks and prospects.“
 

credulous

Registered User
Nov 18, 2021
3,911
5,163
i was optimistic about an in season move to address the defense but i'm getting less optimistic by the day. they're not really taking advantage of abby being close by running a short roster and the joshua and demko injuries dragging on is really hampering their ability to manufacture deadline space

right now any kind of injury is going to necessitate LTIR and torpedo any hope of making a purely additive change to this roster

that leaves just money in money out deals and they don't really have any surplus money to move out. heinen, desharnais or suter maybe but heinen has an m-ntc (really? how?) and suter and desharnais don't really make enough to make a splashy addition
 

Vector

Moderator
Feb 2, 2007
27,067
45,561
Junktown
i was optimistic about an in season move to address the defense but i'm getting less optimistic by the day. they're not really taking advantage of abby being close by running a short roster and the joshua and demko injuries dragging on is really hampering their ability to manufacture deadline space

right now any kind of injury is going to necessitate LTIR and torpedo any hope of making a purely additive change to this roster

that leaves just money in money out deals and they don't really have any surplus money to move out. heinen, desharnais or suter maybe but heinen has an m-ntc (really? how?) and suter and desharnais don't really make enough to make a splashy addition

After this road trip they should send Bains down (three-day break and multiple two-day breaks) and with Joshua due back in 1-2 weeks that'll get them over 1m in cap space. Other than a few days, haven't really had a chance to run a short roster. They are essentially running a 22-man roster right now with Forbort being away.
 

sandwichbird2023

Registered User
Aug 4, 2004
4,022
2,145
i was optimistic about an in season move to address the defense but i'm getting less optimistic by the day. they're not really taking advantage of abby being close by running a short roster and the joshua and demko injuries dragging on is really hampering their ability to manufacture deadline space

right now any kind of injury is going to necessitate LTIR and torpedo any hope of making a purely additive change to this roster

that leaves just money in money out deals and they don't really have any surplus money to move out. heinen, desharnais or suter maybe but heinen has an m-ntc (really? how?) and suter and desharnais don't really make enough to make a splashy addition
They can always send Forbort going the other way to remove $1.5m cap commitment. Then have the other team retain 50%, and find a 3rd team to retain another 50%, so essentially Forbort's salary should net us somebody close to $6m cap hit (plus whatever we banked over the season), assuming max retention from 2 different teams. At least that is how I understand it.

It would add to the cost of acquisition, but I think its doable.
 

David71

Registered User
Dec 27, 2008
17,661
1,809
vancouver
Mario Ferraro this name is intriguing young fits vancouvers agegroup. hows his game overall any sharks fans wanna chime in?
 

StickShift

In a pickle 🥒
Feb 29, 2004
7,419
6,335
New York
Considering management's predisposition to trade for players they are already familiar with—I think Mike Matheson or Marcus Pettersson are the defensemen they would prioritize going after before the TDL. They already traded for each player once while with Pittsburgh.
 

ManVanFan

Registered User
Mar 28, 2024
624
599
Mario Ferraro this name is intriguing young fits vancouvers agegroup. hows his game overall any sharks fans wanna chime in?
SJ has probably broke him beyond repair. I thought he was a good fit years ago but now if the price is low then I would, otherwise it seems like a gamble to think that he would automatically be better on a better team. The last couple times I've watched SJ play, I'd put him in the same realm as Soucy for quality.
 
Last edited:

oceanchild

Registered User
Jul 5, 2009
3,746
1,789
Whitehorse, YT
Would a Pettersson for Cozens and Byram make sense for the framework of a deal. I think this would balance the lineup more and both players have high upsides and it would free up a bit of cap space (maybe Forbort also goes back).

I still think Petey rebounds and when he does I have a feeling he goes on a hot streak. But the D group isn’t going to take us to the promise land as configured.
 

PavelBure10

The Russian Rocket
Aug 25, 2009
5,545
7,756
Okanagan
Mario Ferraro this name is intriguing young fits vancouvers agegroup. hows his game overall any sharks fans wanna chime in?
I wouldn't mind Ferraro, but apparently the price tag on his last season was insanely high. 1st rounder, +, +. If we're going to be paying those types of prices, I would rather go after a more recognized player who excels at both ends of the ice. Rasmus Andersson would of been great, but with 3 goals already and being a beloved teammate, I am not sure he's going anywhere any time soon.

Would love to add that #3 defenseman though.
 

ManVanFan

Registered User
Mar 28, 2024
624
599
Would a Pettersson for Cozens and Byram make sense for the framework of a deal. I think this would balance the lineup more and both players have high upsides and it would free up a bit of cap space (maybe Forbort also goes back).

I still think Petey rebounds and when he does I have a feeling he goes on a hot streak. But the D group isn’t going to take us to the promise land as configured.
That would definitely give management something to think about I'd say.
 

StickShift

In a pickle 🥒
Feb 29, 2004
7,419
6,335
New York
I think we should pay close attention to how Tom Willander is trending this season in the NCAA.
  • If he establishes a clear path to playing NHL minutes in the next 1-2 seasons—they'll keep him.
  • If he doesn't clearly project as being NHL ready and needs refinement in the AHL—they'll trade him for immediate impact help.
I don't think Allvin and Rutherford care about extending their window in 3-4 years from now. If he isn't ready to help this team win now—he will be moved for someone who is.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad