Grub's Canucks & NHL News, Rumours, and & Fantasy GM | Go Your Own Way

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
  • We are currently aware of "log in/security error" issues that are affecting some users. We apologize and ask for your patience as we try to get these issues fixed.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Tocchet and Foote have always preferred bigger and more physical guys on the backend. It makes absolute sense given these guys played with or against the Stevens, Hatchers and Prongers back in the day.

Undersized guys will continue to have a hard time breaking through unless they are fully elite or physical. It was the same case in Arizona with him...

I hate to break it to them but Forbort, Desharnais and Myers are not Stevens, Hatcher or Pronger...they're not even Marek Malik...they're probably closer to Andrew Alberts. lol
 
It's only half about Brannstrom, but mostly about having to watch juulsen cost goals against, cause turnovers and icings ,and cannot make a pass.

Brannstrom could be Friedman or Wolanin or anyone who can just be a competent, decent sixth defenseman.

Just need to add a solid 4/5 and get hronek back and things start to fall I to place alot better.

Also so many teams still in the wildcard races prices are high and options are few, so we may have to wait until the 4nations deadline for trades to heat up.
 
He was +8 with 38 points in 60 games carrying the second pair in Detroit, behind Mo Seider.

They didn’t want to pay him top pair dollars to play as 2RHD so they traded him.

He’s come to Vancouver and shown he can play on a top pair, you say he needs to carry a pair (which he did in Detroit).

So in Detroit, he wasn’t a top pair guy, in Vancouver, he can’t carry a pairing. In reality, he’s just a good hockey player whom we miss a lot.

Carrying a second pairing on a rebuilding team with no aspirations is a little different than carrying a 2nd pairing on a team that is aiming to do damage in the playoffs.

Fact is Detroit never really believed in his ability to be a legit top-4 D-man on a contending team, if they did they would have kept him. Typically teams just don't let go of quality D-men in their prime that are under team control. They could really use him now instead of playing the likes of Justin Holl or the carcass of Jeff Petry on their right side.

Nothing against Hronek, who has been excellent here.
 
I think Hronek is very underrated. I think because he plays with Hughes he doesn't get any credit. I'd love for him to run his own pairing with Soucy when he's back and keep Myers up with Hughes.

I don't know if he's underrated, if anything his absence has made it abundantly clear how important he is to the team.

I'll just have to see a Soucy - Hronek pairing excel before I believe it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Baby Pettersson
It seems to happen every season.....the Canucks land in 'Winterpeg' at the tail end of a road-trip, and are usually running on fumes by the time they get there.

Don't know who's between the pipes for the Canucks. It could be Lankinen coming off a shutout over the Leafs; but more probably it's Demko.

This is one game where the Canuck goalie is going to have to find a way to outplay Hellebucyk at the other end, and probably steal one.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Ad