Vector and LB?The rumors are starting to get out of hand, perpetuated by some clickbait content peddlers.
Vector and LB?The rumors are starting to get out of hand, perpetuated by some clickbait content peddlers.
I love how even when you condense what insiders say as much as possible it's still redundant- Canucks are going to do something; they like to be active
- No question they are going to do something
- Rutherford has been telling everyone they are going to do something
I love how even when you condense what insiders say as much as possible it's still redundant
I said what I said.
A L E, ZacharySittin in a tree
F U C ...
As I recall that dinner was because the team/management had been crap for so long there was concern Pettersson wanted out. Please correct me if I'm wrong. There may have been other dinners.I don't remember who reported it, but it was 100% out there somewhere back around the time Aquilini was having emergency dinners with EP because his play was so bad.
Why were my posts trimmed? They weren't heated at all.
Trimmed some stuff out as it was getting a bit heated.
Disagreements are fine and healthy, provided it's respectful, everybody.
At this point given the circumstances it’s hard to imagine we would “win” any trade involving Pettersson, but if this discourse continues it is going to be a huge distraction. Best case scenario is that we string together a handful of wins so that management can make a decision while not under duress and hopefully with some leverage.
A L E, Zachary
As I recall that dinner was because the team/management had been crap for so long there was concern Pettersson wanted out. Please correct me if I'm wrong. There may have been other dinners.
I vaguely recall that somebody walking along Robson Street spotted Aquilini through a restaurant window dining with Hughes and Pettersson, and another player, maybe the team captain Horvat or somebody.As I recall that dinner was because the team/management had been crap for so long there was concern Pettersson wanted out. Please correct me if I'm wrong. There may have been other dinners.
I'm failing to see how my posts weren't respectful. MS made a claim i asked him about it, he answered, I replied questioning his stance. Nothing heated.See below.
I remember it differently, but too lazy to look it up. Can't imagine anyone would call in Aquilini to talk about a player's performance, though. Makes no sense to me, though to be fair little does about the Benning years.At the time, it was mostly framed in the media from what I recall as the owner sitting down with the player to see where his head was at because his play had been so poor. And yeah, if he wanted out, what the deal was. It was an unusual occurrence, in the middle of a terrible stretch of play from the player.
Today I learned that a star forward on our team is choosy about his linemates. His linemates going into last year's playoffs were Ilya Mikheyev and Nils Hoglander. This is supposed to make sense.
Sure doesn't seem too high maintenance to me, given the crap he's had to play with over the years, but what do I know. I'm obviously inclined to believe the best, as, unlike some others, I still like the player.Tocchet even said in last seasons year end, about Pettersson not complaining who he played with, and how he wanted him to feel comfortable coming into Tocchet's office and asking for more, asking for better linemates (I'm paraphrasing). Pettersson just kept his head down and played with his revolving (and revolting) list of linemates.
I'm failing to see how my posts weren't respectful. MS made a claim i asked him about it, he answered, I replied questioning his stance. Nothing heated.
I don't think you can make a claim like that and not back it up. With how polarizing Pettersson is in this market even a little off hand comment would have some evidence of it happening. Someone would have posted about it etc.