Grub's Canucks & NHL News, Rumours, and & Fantasy GM | Christmas Presents

VanJack

Registered User
Jul 11, 2014
23,003
16,502
I mean some of you people seriously drive me nuts. Are you planning on not watching the Canucks in three or four years? We’ve had one good season. This one is up in the air. And you guys wanna go all ? as far as trades go, if a good trade is available make it. But the guys you are temporarily hating we’re not gonna bring you back much. And every decision has to include complying with the cap.
Absolutely true. I remember at the start of last season, Rutherford basically said that "everything had to go right, for the Canucks to even make the playoffs" And I'm sure he believed it.

Basically everything did go right. Pettersson and Miller were 100-point centers; Hughes won the Norris; Boeser had 40 goals; and Demko was a finalist in the Vezina voting. Even guys like Soucy and Myers had 'career years'.

But this year's version of the Canucks is probably closer to what they really are. There's a reason why Fan-duel; Sports Action and almost every betting site has the Canucks miles down the list of Stanley Cup contenders. They see a team that dramatically overachieved last year, and is coming back down to earth.

So blowing up another chunk of the future to add to this core in the vain hope that they're actually a Cup contender, is sheer folly imo.

The best case scenario is that they scuffle around the wild-card playoff bar.....and even if they make it, they won't be favored even in the first round. Even Rutherford said last night, that their home record 'isn't the record of a playoff team'.

That's just the way it is.
 

Ernie

Registered User
Aug 3, 2004
13,300
3,165
Absolutely true. I remember at the start of last season, Rutherford basically said that "everything had to go right, for the Canucks to even make the playoffs" And I'm sure he believed it.

Basically everything did go right. Pettersson and Miller were 100-point centers; Hughes won the Norris; Boeser had 40 goals; and Demko was a finalist in the Vezina voting. Even guys like Soucy and Myers had 'career years'.

But this year's version of the Canucks is probably closer to what they really are. There's a reason why Fan-duel; Sports Action and almost every betting site has the Canucks miles down the list of Stanley Cup contenders. They see a team that dramatically overachieved last year, and is coming back down to earth.

So blowing up another chunk of the future to add to this core in the vain hope that they're actually a Cup contender, is sheer folly imo.

The best case scenario is that they scuffle around the wild-card playoff bar.....and even if they make it, they won't be favored even in the first round. Even Rutherford said last night, that their home record 'isn't the record of a playoff team'.

That's just the way it is.

This is the dose of reality this fanbase needs right now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChilliBilly

rypper

21-12-05 it's finally over.
Dec 22, 2006
17,313
22,198
This team isn't going anywhere without a healthy Demko and Petey playing at an elite level - both of which aren't happening right now (and might not)

No point going all in

Lankinen is a fine 1b to play while Demko finds his game. Hronek back and another top 4 defender pushes everyone down in minutes and provides Pettersson with someone who can actually get him the puck unlike the ring it of the boards trees he's currently playing with.
 

DFAC

Registered User
Jan 19, 2008
7,891
6,038
Vancouver
Lankinen is a fine 1b to play while Demko finds his game. Hronek back and another top 4 defender pushes everyone down in minutes and provides Pettersson with someone who can actually get him the puck unlike the ring it of the boards trees he's currently playing with.
Oh come on - we're really blaming Petey's poor play on our defenseman? This is a new hot (and bad) take
 

rypper

21-12-05 it's finally over.
Dec 22, 2006
17,313
22,198
Oh come on - we're really blaming Petey's poor play on our defenseman? This is a new hot (and bad) take
It's a contributing factor. Not the only factor.

Pettersson plays nearly exclusively with Hughes while Miller is gone, goes on a heater. Miller is back and gets glued to Hughes, Pettersson has a couple bad games.

There's a lot more to it, but they could be doing more to set him up for success.
 

DFAC

Registered User
Jan 19, 2008
7,891
6,038
Vancouver
It's a contributing factor. Not the only factor.

Pettersson plays nearly exclusively with Hughes while Miller is gone, goes on a heater. Miller is back and gets glued to Hughes, Pettersson has a couple bad games.

There's a lot more to it, but they could be doing more to set him up for success.

It's on him to make those around him better, not the other way around.

He's being paid like a top player in the league and he needs to start playing like one. Do fans make the same excuses for guys like MacKinnon, Kaprizov, Kucherov?
 
  • Like
Reactions: PavelBure10

rypper

21-12-05 it's finally over.
Dec 22, 2006
17,313
22,198
It's on him to make those around him better, not the other way around.

He's being paid like a top player in the league and he needs to start playing like one. Do fans make the same excuses for guys like MacKinnon, Kaprizov, Kucherov?

Well they all play with their teams top defenders no?
 
  • Like
Reactions: supercanuck

I am toxic

. . . even in small doses
Oct 24, 2014
9,728
15,538
Vancouver
Any thought that the team will be better in a few years from now is beyond ridiculous.

Miller and Demko will be aging out, and Hughes will be getting the market rate for the anticipated higher cap.

If there is the suggestion that in a few years Petterson and Boeser slightly past their primes, and the addition of 'maki, will somehow more than compensate for Demko and Miller's decline, then I don't know what to say.

Who am I kidding, I know exactly what to say: it's moronic.

The time to go all in is now. Oh wait, I forgot this is Hockey's future. Of course the team should hold onto prospects and picks. Whatever was I thinking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hansen and ephmrl

PavelBure10

The Russian Rocket
Aug 25, 2009
6,148
8,474
Okanagan
The time is now

Boeser 27 turns 28 in February
Miller 31 turns 32 in March
Demko 29
Pettersson 26
Hughes 25

The time is now no question. If Allvin doesn't go all in, he just wasted our best opportunity with this core.

I honestly feel like last year was the year. The stars aligned and everything went right. That is until Demko got hurt and Petey disappeared in the playoffs.
 

Kryten

slightly regarded
Sponsor
Sep 29, 2011
16,725
14,334
Kootenays
The time is now

Boeser 27 turns 28 in February
Miller 31 turns 32 in March
Demko 29
Pettersson 26
Hughes 25

The time is now no question. If Allvin doesn't go all in, he just wasted our best opportunity with this core.

I honestly feel like last year was the year. The stars aligned and everything went right. That is until Demko got hurt and Petey disappeared in the playoffs.
Last year was only the year because we had NSH fall into our laps. It was funny pushing EDM to the limit with Demko and Hughes hurt, Pettersson MIA and a 3rd string goalie though
 

Nick Lang

Registered User
May 14, 2015
2,448
920
The time is now

Boeser 27 turns 28 in February
Miller 31 turns 32 in March
Demko 29
Pettersson 26
Hughes 25

The time is now no question. If Allvin doesn't go all in, he just wasted our best opportunity with this core.

I honestly feel like last year was the year. The stars aligned and everything went right. That is until Demko got hurt and Petey disappeared in the playoffs.

If this is the year I don't think it's going to very happy around here. This year is not looking great with all the obstacles we've had. It looks like a crapshoot. I would be looking to next year when hopefully Willander and another legit age appropriate top 4 defender are added. Obviously if we can add such a player this year go for it but the opportunity may not come until the offseason.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ChilliBilly

Ernie

Registered User
Aug 3, 2004
13,300
3,165
Any thought that the team will be better in a few years from now is beyond ridiculous.

Miller and Demko will be aging out, and Hughes will be getting the market rate for the anticipated higher cap.

If there is the suggestion that in a few years Petterson and Boeser slightly past their primes, and the addition of 'maki, will somehow more than compensate for Demko and Miller's decline, then I don't know what to say.

Who am I kidding, I know exactly what to say: it's moronic.

The time to go all in is now. Oh wait, I forgot this is Hockey's future. Of course the team should hold onto prospects and picks. Whatever was I thinking.

I don't know what next year looks like but it's usually not the year to go for it when the coach is openly musing that players have checked out in December.

Maybe things turn around but it seems unlikely the Canucks will be able to make the kind of trades to fix this defence in the short term regardless. Smarter to save their powder for the offseason.
 

Ad

Ad

Ad