I couldn’t disagree more. I think you need to go 1a and 1b moving forward with Demko. He’s proven to be unreliable in terms of health and should be starting 40-50 games.Just wanna say if you can't resign Lankinen by the trade deadline then you trade him for a 2nd (hell you could probably even get a 1st).
Let's be honest. Demko is our goalie and will be starting in the playoffs. Do you really think it's a good idea to hold onto Lankinen (miss out on a high pick) just for 10 regular season games and watch him walk in the off season?
And if Demko isn't our goalie in the playoffs then you throw any dollar amount you can at Lankinen and lock him up.
Couldn't be more simple really.
The entire time I’ve followed this team, under several different regimes, they’ve never moved an asset at its peak because it was smart.
Usually, hold on until the asset dies or leaves for nothing.
It would be such a forward thinking move to build Demko up and move either him or Lankinen. Could probably get a haul.
I would move Boeser, Suter and anyone else I could. This team has a 0% chance to win with its defense as is. As they have already moved so many assets for rentals I really don’t think they can do it anymore.
I couldn't agree more. I've said many times we need to resign Lankinen and I'm 100% ok with keeping Demko too. It's what I prefer.I couldn’t disagree more. I think you need to go 1a and 1b moving forward with Demko. He’s proven to be unreliable in terms of health and should be starting 40-50 games.
I think you try to sign Lankinen for three more years at 3 million per of so and then roll both next year. The tricky part will be the year after when Demko’s a UFA.
We are buyers and we will be. But our window with Hughes is just opening. It's also a smart thing to keep the window open for as long as we can.I don’t understand why people are talking about selling half the guys on the team. Are we not supposed to be competing in this window? We should be buyers, full stop.
I don’t understand why people are talking about selling half the guys on the team. Are we not supposed to be competing in this window? We should be buyers, full stop.
the hell does that mean. miller has to bend and everyone has to bend"? so the mgmnt has to keep a short leash on miller because hes the vocal one? and is and will at somepoint blow up at a teammate or coach?Friedman can be so frustrating. On the one hand says rumors got out of control and crossed the line, and then drops his weird little "Miller has to bend, everyone has to bend" comment that will do nothing but fan the flames of rumors. He can be such a hack sometimes.
the hell does that mean. miller has to bend and everyone has to bend"? so the mgmnt has to keep a short leash on miller because hes the vocal one? and is and will at somepoint blow up at a teammate or coach?
who else do u think on the roster cant stand millers abrasive approachh. besides petterson. myers?The idea is that Miller and teammates need to coexist and meet in the middle. Like how normal human interactions work.
who else do u think on the roster cant stand millers abrasive approachh. besides petterson. myers?
What do we get for Hoglander, Desharnais, 25 1st?
I’ve had so much to drink but I want you all to know I appreciate every response after the offending post.
As someone who has also been drinking most of the day, what the heck did I miss?
Hell yeah!
Nothing got removed. A badger decided to post some thoughts.
Hell yeah!
Nothing got removed. A badger decided to post some thoughts.
The point of the NHL is to accrue value, not win games!I don’t understand why people are talking about selling half the guys on the team. Are we not supposed to be competing in this window? We should be buyers, full stop.
what walls of text ..Oh.
I didn't realize anyone actually read those walls of text.