I agree with the first two.that is a short list of mostly reasonable judgment calls. rebuttal
-mikheyev was signed when we were rock bottom and had limited ufa options. until he got injured it looked like it would pay off. having a guy whose principle asset is skating suffer an acl injury two months after you sign him counts as a mulligan.
-kuzmenko had to be extended to retain an asset. he was always free money and they were able to move him.
-myers extended in isolation was fine. myers in front line regular season duty not so much. the failure was not infilling between myers and hronek. that is a major error that has really impacted this season.
-desharnais was a whiff but not a strike out. he is still a useful playoff depth piece.
-forbert has been injured and is now starting to look pretty serviceable. stay tuned.
-completely agree that juulsen was not adequate or prudent depth and the playoffs demonstrated that fact. i suspect that was a coach's pet situation and we are talking about a guy who was never more than 7/8 on the depth chart.
where they messed up imo, is not infilling behind forbert and hronek. they should have traded if necessary to get rhd help.
I don't see a problem with this at all. We were competitive last year, in the hunt this year, and with a couple additions through the trade (plus Boeser) I could see us being just as competitive very quickly. Just with a revitalized and longer timeline.
We will hopefully gain a younger less volatile center. Add in a capable defender or two that makes a huge difference, and cap space to upgrade further in line with our core's average age. In my mind it's no guarantee but we could certainly be in a better position 1-2 years from now with a trade today. In fact it seems logical to me. I don't think there is any way they go full rebuild and attempt to not be competitive if that's what you're suggesting.
Or they are using the press conference to announce a trade to <not rangers>. How baller would that be.press conference is probably we aren't trading miller and have faith in their roster
On the positive side, just found out that I can get dark mode again.
I've said it before, and I'll say it again - and not that I doubt you all do appreciate it at this point - but @Vector does lion's work. Just outstanding stuff, and Board MVP by a mile.
Sherwood definite win, though Hughes was pushing hard for that signing apparently.Sherwood, Lankinen, Debrusk.
I've said it before, and I'll say it again - and not that I doubt you all do appreciate it at this point - but @Vector does lion's work. Just outstanding stuff, and Board MVP by a mile.
LeVector JamesVector on a generational run
He absolutely is.
But to take some of the credit I gave him some JT Miller style tough love on X this morning to kick start his day, so he's firing on all cylinders
I miss OG fallout humorJust like the real vault dweller.
agree. cap reality made myers an irresistable move when you are two rhd down. thinking he could platoon with desharnais was folly.I agree with the first two.
I don’t think you can isolate the last four things you mentioned.
The first two you can. The last four are part of a failure to address the blueline this past summer and it all ties together. Especially that right side.
Now do I think the issues with the blueline were exacerbated by the two centers playing like ass and not helping this team be competitive so that we’ve probably already added a top four D? Yes. Doesn’t change that all being a mess.
I want to see a Miller to the Islanders trade purely to witness how Patrick Roy and Miller interact.
He is our Quinn Hughes.Vector on a generational run
Please pardon the invasion, but I'm wondering if any of y'all here know where or from whom this might have come from. (EDIT: Aside from the obvious answer of "that article, duh" ). Literally nobody at HFCBJ has heard it before and so we're a mite confused. (And have other thoughts but this isn't the time or place.) There's like four names on the byline on that Athletic article so we can't tell if it's something worth us caring about.
- Blue Jackets may be interested in acquiring Boeser as a rental; they hold him in high regard
Thomas Drance and Rick DhaliwalPlease pardon the invasion, but I'm wondering if any of y'all here know where or from whom this might have come from. (EDIT: Aside from the obvious answer of "that article, duh" ). Literally nobody at HFCBJ has heard it before and so we're a mite confused. (And have other thoughts but this isn't the time or place.) There's like four names on the byline on that Athletic article so we can't tell if it's something worth us caring about.
Please pardon the invasion, but I'm wondering if any of y'all here know where or from whom this might have come from. (EDIT: Aside from the obvious answer of "that article, duh" ). Literally nobody at HFCBJ has heard it before and so we're a mite confused. (And have other thoughts but this isn't the time or place.) There's like four names on the byline on that Athletic article so we can't tell if it's something worth us caring about.