I'm fully loving the narrative that this is Marjamäki's loss. Nobody elses. Absolutely nobody else could have done anything better.
At the same time, the 1st 3 wins were anything but Marjamäki's wins. The narrative is drilled too deeply into the fans minds its so laughable.
Also- ''Replace Pokka with Heiskanen'' when they're on the same ****ing pair.
Handedness issues on the power play surely will be rectified by a 18 year old youngster, he's superior to everyone on the team![]()
This bad boy?Heinz Ehlers says the difference between US, Canada and Finland, is that Finland are not as physical, and that suits DK better.
That's true, and it showed today. I think playing yesterday might have some effect on it, but Finland was completely outmuscled today.Heinz Ehlers says the difference between US, Canada and Finland, is that Finland are not as physical, and that suits DK better.
You might know his son, NikolajThis bad boy?
![]()
People who thinks FIN is gonna win this by 4 goals are absolutely insane. Yes Finland have 1½ scary line, but Denmark has two NHL calibre lines too now and the other two lines can on a decent day play equally well. Especially with the addition of two NHL players from Denmark.
Finland has played nothing but teams with 1 or two NHL players so far in the tournament and all the sudden they are an amazing team?
Stop drinking so much.
You might know his son, Nikolaj
![]()
He is best buds with Laine.
People who thinks FIN is gonna win this by 4 goals are absolutely insane. Yes Finland have 1½ scary line, but Denmark has two NHL calibre lines too now and the other two lines can on a decent day play equally well. Especially with the addition of two NHL players from Denmark.
Finland has played nothing but teams with 1 or two NHL players so far in the tournament and all the sudden they are an amazing team?
Stop drinking so much.
We fortunately have to beat Germany and we are fine, I think.Maybe a new strange record in WHC history. Finland scores over 30 Goals and don t qualify for QF.![]()
!
Okay? But it is not better to be 1. or 2.? To avoid RUS or SWE in QF?We fortunately have to beat Germany and we are fine, I think.
I don't care who we play in the QF if we make the game. We can beat anyone on a good day. Ofc it helps to be 1-2 but Czechs have usually been a terrible opponent for us in the QF. Switzerland can surprise.. if we play Russia/Sweden, we won't be the favourite so if we lose, it maybe won't suck as much.Okay? But it is not better to be 1. or 2.? To avoid RUS or SWE in QF?
Yes right! But CZE and SWISS are not so strong as RUS and SWE. I think it isn t good to careless give away place 1 and 2.I don't care who we play in the QF if we make the game. We can beat anyone on a good day. Ofc it helps to be 1-2 but Czechs have usually been a terrible opponent for us in the QF. Switzerland can surprise.. if we play Russia/Sweden, we won't be the favourite so if we lose, it maybe won't suck as much.
Of course not, but if it happens, I don't think it as such a bad thing. Still I hope we can beat both Canada and USA.Yes right! But CZE and SWISS are not so strong as RUS and SWE. I think it isn t good to careless give away place 1 and 2.
Yes i hope the record vs big nations could be better now under Marjamäki. But after the Denmark-Game,i ve some doubt.Of course not, but if it happens, I don't thin it as such a bad thing. Still I hope we can beat both Canada and USA.
How can we beat them with the lack of speed ans strength?Yes right! But CZE and SWISS are not so strong as RUS and SWE. I think it isn t good to careless give away place 1 and 2.
Okay? But it is not better to be 1. or 2.? To avoid RUS or SWE in QF?