GDT: Group A • Feb. 15 • United States vs. Russia • Part IV

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/
Status
Not open for further replies.

Yeah15

2nd Tier Fan
Sponsor
Mar 15, 2007
6,057
1,152
Backes could have pulled out a schank and knifed Markov and there wouldn't have been a penalty. and then the ref has the nerve to give Markov **** for complaining? Bull ****, moronic ref
 

Ewan McGregor*

Guest
did the clock mess up there?

it didn't start right away or something
 

trashbag

Registered User
Oct 17, 2011
14
11
Västerås, Sweden
What a stupid rule, not allowing the goal. Why do you have refs anyway if you just could make the decisions afterwards. I think that the only help they should get is to see if the puck is in or not. Very vague(?) rules if the goal from Czech Republic vs. Sweden counts when the czech inteference Kronwall in to his own net but not this. Can't see the difference. I think that if the video reviewer can decide one of this things he can decide the other too. But anyway my opinion is that the reviewer only should decide if the puck is over the line or not. Otherwise we can play without refs on the ice. In floorball, a popular game here in Sweden similiar to hockey, it's a goal if the ball crosses the line even if the cage is knocked over or away from it's position. I think it should be the same in hockey.

Sorry for HORRIBLE english. Just wanted to say my opinion.
 

Canucks LB

My Favourite, Gone too soon, RIP Luc, We miss you
Oct 12, 2008
78,233
32,978
For all the crap people gave USA's picks, martin, orpik, I found them to be playing very solid, nothing amazing, but not awful either.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad