buffalowing88
Registered User
Just to clarify, this forum Is designed for discussion but if you try and discuss something against the consensus, it's wrong?
Did I? I have two posts in this particular thread. One says, "anyone can count" and the other one says, "counting isn't talent evaluation, even if the count is high".But you did say that in your original comment, where you stated that Gretzky was never once the best scorer at any point in his career.
That is quite the statement and you should probably do more work to show how you conclude that.
Ah sorry, I mixed up your comments with another who was responding to me.Did I? I have two posts in this particular thread. One says, "anyone can count" and the other one says, "counting isn't talent evaluation, even if the count is high".
One thing I could never figure out was why goalies were generally short-to-mid-sized in the 1970s-to-mid(?)-1980s. But I guess it was just hard to find big men who had the reflexes to play goal. There was Pete Peeters and Ron Hextall... any other biggies?I also think it helped that the goalies weren't all 5'7'' as well. Seemed like being 6 foot in the 80's put you at giant status.
Gretzky wasn't taking many slappers from the blue line anyway. Most of his slapshots were from the slot. He'd walk in pretty close and take the big windup.Slap shots from the blue line stopped going in 85% of the time
He went to the net when he was younger because it was easier to do so in the early '80s. More time and space.He simply became more focused on playmaking as he got older. When he was a young gun he was going to the net alot more. He mellowed with age probably to self preserve, amd focused more and more playmaking which was his biggest strength.
The league got better over a period of many years. Defense really started to significantly improve around the mid-'80s. It didn't become great all at once, but it continued to improve for the next decade.Ah yes, another round of the league somehow got better the instant Lemieux was drafted argument...
The knee injury in 1987 is a big part of the decrease. It impacted his edge work and ability to drive the net.
He still lead the league in goals in 1986-87. When he got hurt in 1987-88 he was 1 goal behind Lemieux for lead and on pace for 63 goals.
![]()
NHL Stats
The official source for NHL Stats including skaters, goalies, teams stats and more.www.nhl.com
He only scored 10 goals on his last 26 games post return (32 goal pace).
He basically lost 10 goals/season with that injury. He had played at a ~62 goal pace for 110ish games, then instantly became a ~51 goal pace guy for the next 110ish games.
The 1991 Suter hit rightfully gets blamed for abruptly ending his prime. But the 1987 knee injury is the second most impactful of his career.
This is a fact that gretzky fans like to throw in the rug. While lemieux was scoring 69 in 70 in similar scoring leagues as today. I think with the time the truth will come out
The league has consistently gotten better over time in the sense that athletes overall have gotten better through better nutrition, more professional training regimes etc.The league got better over a period of many years. Defense really started to significantly improve around the mid-'80s. It didn't become great all at once, but it continued to improve for the next decade.
The league has consistently gotten better over time in the sense that athletes overall have gotten better through better nutrition, more professional training regimes etc.
But you need to actually point at specifics to prove a large jump year to year though. Like I find it credible to say that expansion diluted the talented pool, I also find it credible to say that the influx of European (specifically Soviet bloc) talent post-1990 helped fill those holes in rosters again, I'll even buy that increased participation in the U.S. improved the talent pool from the mid 00s onward. But what exactly is supposed to have happened in the mid 1980s?
One thing I could never figure out was why goalies were generally short-to-mid-sized in the 1970s-to-mid(?)-1980s. But I guess it was just hard to find big men who had the reflexes to play goal. There was Pete Peeters and Ron Hextall... any other biggies?
But, you know, did size of goalies really affect Gretzky much? I would say no. From 1988-89 to 1990-91, his shooting percentage is still higher than Fleury, Sakic, Lafontaine, Yzerman, etc, and equal to Brett Hull's.
Coaching took a big step up and became more professional. It wasn't just having a former player there to motivate the players and call out the lines. Professional development camps for coaches took a big step forward in the 80s. Look at the numbers of assistant coaches per team as well, many teams had only 1 at the beginning of the decade.But what exactly is supposed to have happened in the mid 1980s?
my belief is that, even before the butterfly was really a thing, a goalie would very obviously have to get down and back up many many times throughout a game.One thing I could never figure out was why goalies were generally short-to-mid-sized in the 1970s-to-mid(?)-1980s. But I guess it was just hard to find big men who had the reflexes to play goal. There was Pete Peeters and Ron Hextall... any other biggies?
But, you know, did size of goalies really affect Gretzky much? I would say no. From 1988-89 to 1990-91, his shooting percentage is still higher than Fleury, Sakic, Lafontaine, Yzerman, etc, and equal to Brett Hull's.
my belief is that, even before the butterfly was really a thing, a goalie would very obviously have to get down and back up many many times throughout a game.
The pads back then were heavy and soaked up water, getting heavier as the game went on.
Now, if you have ever been in a martial arts or crossfit gym you will know that short little fire hydrant guys are inherently better at burpees than tall, skinny guys. Its not even close, and there really arent exceptions. And they are also usually better at moving weight with their short limbs.
Guys built like Ryan Miller are not built for 40lb horsehair pads, imo.
Its a horses for courses kind of thing. Darwinism. Those pads dictated the type of athlete that rose to the top. The new ones dictate a different type.
What do we make of his goalscoring across 2 of his final 3 playoff runs?
I was always super impressed by his 1997 playoffs. 10 goals and 20 points in 15 games is almost as good as peak Ovechkin with 11 and 21 in 14 games, and Gretzky did it in a lower scoring season on a worse offensive team I’m pretty sure.
Yeah, that one speaks for Gretzky not being quite finished as a goal scorer. 1996-97 was however a slightly higher scoring season than 2008-09 (2.92 v. 2.85 gpg), and those Rangers weren’t that much worse offensively than the 09 Caps: 258 goals for 4th overall v. 268 for 3rd overall, that’s one more goal scored every 8 or 9 games for OV’s Caps.
What was the goals per game average in the playoffs I wonder? I seem to remember around this time the playoffs goals per game were even relatively lower than the regular seasons in other eras.