Agreed with the Penguins, especially considering the 2nd cup was won without Letang at all in the playoffs which is unbelievable when you look at their defense that playoff run
who was the greatest of the past 10 years?
As of now its Hawks simply because 3 cups in 6 > 2 cups
+ Hawks/Kings runs coincided and as result a potential 3 peat for both teams was upended running into each other in Conference Finals in 2013 (Hawks won) and 2014 (Kings won)
Wont be shocked if TB wins a few more though given talent on team especially young talent
there's also a strong argument that it's the flukiest cup ever won though
shortened seasons happen sometimes, divisions change sometimes
but as far as I know last year is the only time play has stopped for multiple months in the middle of the season right before the Playoffs, and that has a pretty giant effect on how teams will play
Nope. So let me put an asterisk put restore order to the universe.No, not confused. But just curious: as of today, July 6, 2021, does Tampa have two Cups in the last decade?
LA and Chicago had to play each other in the Conference finals in 2013 and 2014 though, with each one winning once. They both might have won 3 straight if they didn't have to face another team at this level. Tampa hasn't had the face that and it's arguable whether the Caps were that for the Pens.
Not gonna happen...so many different ways to take your question.
Pens won back to back, and that's the greater accomplishment, so I voted them.
Which of the teams who won multiple cups had the greatest roster? Probably Chicago
Which of the teams who won multiple cups had the greatest individual playoff run? Probably LA 2012...although I even like 2014 with the 0-3 comeback
Tampa could hypothetically overtake Pitt and Chicago for answers 1 and 2 if they win.
Problem is - I don't think they will win. And instead of 2 cups - they'll have the 2 biggest choke jobs in NHL history. 0-4 sweep in round 1 to Columbus, followed by a reverse sweep in the finals, to a major underdog. Sucks for them
Yeah because when Pitt had to play against the perpetual Presidents winning/contending Capitals every year in the 2nd round there was no elite rival to overcome?Chicago and LA are tied in my mind, because they had to contend with each other. I don't feel any of the others had that same elite rival standing in their way to overcome.
Chicago and LA are tied in my mind, because they had to contend with each other. I don't feel any of the others had that same elite rival standing in their way to overcome.
so many different ways to take your question.
Pens won back to back, and that's the greater accomplishment, so I voted them.
Which of the teams who won multiple cups had the greatest roster? Probably Chicago
Which of the teams who won multiple cups had the greatest individual playoff run? Probably LA 2012...although I even like 2014 with the 0-3 comeback
Tampa could hypothetically overtake Pitt and Chicago for answers 1 and 2 if they win.
Problem is - I don't think they will win. And instead of 2 cups - they'll have the 2 biggest choke jobs in NHL history. 0-4 sweep in round 1 to Columbus, followed by a reverse sweep in the finals, to a major underdog. Sucks for them
As of now its Hawks simply because 3 cups in 6 > 2 cups
+ Hawks/Kings runs coincided and as result a potential 3 peat for both teams was upended running into each other in Conference Finals in 2013 (Hawks won) and 2014 (Kings won)
Wont be shocked if TB wins a few more though given talent on team especially young talent
what benefitted the Hawks in 2013 vs the other 30 teams?2013 is an asterisk season though.
what benefitted the Hawks in 2013 vs the other 30 teams?
I would say CHI had tougher opponents int he playoffs (TB, BOS, LA, ANA) than PIT did (SJ, NSH, WSH x2)Kane’s injury allowing them to bring in Vermette for one.
The point is Chicago won 2 in 3 years in a shortened season. PIT did back to back in 82 games.
I would say CHI had tougher opponents int he playoffs (TB, BOS, LA, ANA) than PIT did (SJ, NSH, WSH x2)
I shouldve worded the poll question differently then , shouldve been which "championship teams" were best, not which team was best in the last 10 years. Hence why I wrote then years in the poll options.PIT went through Tampa Bay in 2016 and the President’s Trophy Winner in 2016, 2017. Call me when Chicago wins a cup without Duncan Keith.
CHI also was going up against the Wild, Red Wings and Nashville in those years too.
All of this doesn’t matter though. One team on this list won back to back in 82 game seasons. Even if you want to expand this to include the last ten seasons. Every team has a conference final and two cup appearances. PIT is the only team to make the playoff every year though. So I guess what do you value? Longevity or peak? If it is longevity how do you argue against PIT? If it is peak how do you argue against actually winning two cups in a row?
I would buy the argument Tampa’s longevity over PIT’s if you want to remove the asterisk given they are the only team with 3 SCFs in the last ten years.
I shouldve worded the poll question differently then , shouldve been which "championship teams" were best, not which team was best in the last 10 years. Hence why I wrote then years in the poll options.
Pens and caps coincided with each other. If pens didn't win in 16 and 17 the caps would have. And if pit gets by caps in 18, imo they threepeat.If the Pens and Lightning’s runs coincided with each other’s, this would be a little more fair. Kings and Hawks could have both three-peated if not for each other.