Confirmed with Link: Granlund + Ceci to Dallas for 2025 1st and 2025 conditional 4th (WPG)

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Everybody wants to win. Some work harder at it than others.

I don't think Tyler Toffoli doesn't want to win just because he signed here. I think he got financially compensated to come somewhere where he'd still be a Top 6 guy and wouldn't have to worry about being moved at the deadline.
I think with Toffoli the market was still very tight; how many teams could have given him that contract (especially the NTC)? He probably chose money/security over taking a very short-term deal on a contender, which is respectable. I'd like to think that his familiarity with the area was a tiebreaker. Also, he does have a cup on his resume...

But if it comes out that he rejected a 6x4 deal from Florida, Colorado, or Tampa Bay...then yes, I'd question his motivation in being in SJ.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Baysick
I think with Toffoli the market was still very tight; how many teams could have given him that contract (especially the NTC)? He probably chose money/security over taking a very short-term deal on a contender, which is respectable. I'd like to think that his familiarity with the area was a tiebreaker. Also, he does have a cup on his resume...

But if it comes out that he rejected a 6x4 deal from Florida, Colorado, or Tampa Bay...then yes, I'd question his motivation in being in SJ.
Why would you question his motivation for making a life choice in his career? That’s being overly judgmental.
 
We have no reason whatsoever to worry about finishing anywhere better than #31 and are clearly the favorites to finish #32. My guess is we're in the basement by more than 5 points.
 
  • Like
Reactions: themelkman
Honestly I don’t see any reason for them to mark Benson as untouchable. He is a small winger who while playing in the NHL at 19 is not having much success.

I actually think they should be open to moving anyone including Dahlin. They have lots of valuable square pegs and only round holes to place them. I’m sure the fan base would not want to start over but they need a whole organizational change to be successful.
Untouchable was maybe too strong a word, but Benson is two things: 1) the type of player you win with and 2) never going to get the value in a trade that he has on-ice. Ergo, virtually untouchable in my book. Dahlin could be traded but it would have to be for a legitimate real #1C, someone better than Pettersson, and that player isn't available. When I think of centers who could pull Dahlin in a trade, with age and contract all figured in, it's like. Celebrini (which we wouldn't do), maybe Stutzle, Mackinnon, Barkov, Bedard if you consider him a center, and Hughes if you consider him a center. Matthews and McDavid are too close to UFA and Crosby is too old. So he's not getting traded.

I don't envy Sabres fans. It's hard to see what you can even do, and the longer you want the more your assets depreciate. It's why I think there is some value in drafting for need over drafting strictly the BPA. I'm extremely genuinely curious who Buffalo would pick if they had the 1st overall pick. They'd have to choose a center over another offensive-leaning LHD... right?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Roasted Nuts
Honestly I don’t see any reason for them to mark Benson as untouchable. He is a small winger who while playing in the NHL at 19 is not having much success.

I actually think they should be open to moving anyone including Dahlin. They have lots of valuable square pegs and only round holes to place them. I’m sure the fan base would not want to start over but they need a whole organizational change to be successful.


At this point there is no need to make any moves to help tank further. This team is bad and has maybe a 1% chance of not being bottom 2 which guarantees them on of the big 4 prospects. Moving Walman for anything less than an overpay would just create an environment that would be almost impossible for the young FWs to develop.
With him being under contract next year, there's no rush to move him this year. If the deal is compelling enough and you feel like you're selling high, do it - if not, you can wait.
 
when you've made as much money and had as much success as I have, you'll see that it's not always about the money

and i've made a lot of money... like... a LOT of money
star-wars-revenge-of-sith.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: sharski
when you've made as much money and had as much success as I have, you'll see that it's not always about the money

and i've made a lot of money... like... a LOT of money
Nothing says success like anonymously flexing on a hockey message board.

I used to be a president of a country.
 
Nothing says success like anonymously flexing on a hockey message board.

I used to be a president of a country.
I think the best way to flex in this situation is to write a very large check and mail it to:

Star Platinum
53 Goodrow Sucks Rd
Northern California, 90210

I will report later with a photo of my purchases with said check
 
I think the best way to flex in this situation is to write a very large check and mail it to:

Star Platinum
53 Goodrow Sucks Rd
Northern California, 90210

I will report later with a photo of my purchases with said check
Ha! A clear lie! Given how long that road must be, the odds of you having a double-digit house number are infinitesimally small...
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Sandisfan
I think with Toffoli the market was still very tight; how many teams could have given him that contract (especially the NTC)? He probably chose money/security over taking a very short-term deal on a contender, which is respectable. I'd like to think that his familiarity with the area was a tiebreaker. Also, he does have a cup on his resume...

But if it comes out that he rejected a 6x4 deal from Florida, Colorado, or Tampa Bay...then yes, I'd question his motivation in being in SJ.
He was literally on record saying that having played for 6 teams in 4 years was wearing on him and his family and he wanted to settle down somewhere for an extended period of time near his wife's family...

The other offers he was getting were shorter term and lower dollars based on the reporting of every insider type out there at the time.
 
Untouchable was maybe too strong a word, but Benson is two things: 1) the type of player you win with and 2) never going to get the value in a trade that he has on-ice. Ergo, virtually untouchable in my book. Dahlin could be traded but it would have to be for a legitimate real #1C, someone better than Pettersson, and that player isn't available. When I think of centers who could pull Dahlin in a trade, with age and contract all figured in, it's like. Celebrini (which we wouldn't do), maybe Stutzle, Mackinnon, Barkov, Bedard if you consider him a center, and Hughes if you consider him a center. Matthews and McDavid are too close to UFA and Crosby is too old. So he's not getting traded.

I don't envy Sabres fans. It's hard to see what you can even do, and the longer you want the more your assets depreciate. It's why I think there is some value in drafting for need over drafting strictly the BPA. I'm extremely genuinely curious who Buffalo would pick if they had the 1st overall pick. They'd have to choose a center over another offensive-leaning LHD... right?
I mean it shouldn't be that hard to do if their ownership/GM was smart and strategic. There are pieces there that are good and could fetch a nice return if they were willing to toss emotion to the side and make moves to be more cohesive in terms of team building (Byram, Power, Tuch, etc. would fetch nice returns that would get them that coveted center).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
I'm very curious what Buffalo does with Thompson. Obviously he's highly skilled but I don't think he's a real center. So they really don't have any legit top-6 centers on that roster (Cozens is a wing too).
Agree, i think hes the perfect compliment to either Smith/Celebrini on the RW. Good around the net, elite hands and a nose for goal scoring.
 
I mean it shouldn't be that hard to do if their ownership/GM was smart and strategic. There are pieces there that are good and could fetch a nice return if they were willing to toss emotion to the side and make moves to be more cohesive in terms of team building (Byram, Power, Tuch, etc. would fetch nice returns that would get them that coveted center).
No one is trading them equivalent RHD for their LHD and no one is trading them equivalent centers for their wingers. So making trades would downgrade the talent level on their roster significantly, and they don't have the talent to do that.
 
No one is trading them equivalent RHD for their LHD and no one is trading them equivalent centers for their wingers. So making trades would downgrade the talent level on their roster significantly, and they don't have the talent to do that.
It's why you move the LHD for Centers... Power could return a nice Center. Tuch could return solid draft capital that then is used to acquire RD/C help.

Doesn't have to be a hockey trade that is player for player to get it done. Player for draft capital where you then take the draft capital and more to get the premium position you need.

Buffalo shouldn't be a very hard team to turnaround as they have a lot of talent in duplicative roles. Much easier to have that than the Sharks problem of just not having talent at all.
 
It's why you move the LHD for Centers... Power could return a nice Center. Tuch could return solid draft capital that then is used to acquire RD/C help.

Doesn't have to be a hockey trade that is player for player to get it done. Player for draft capital where you then take the draft capital and more to get the premium position you need.

Buffalo shouldn't be a very hard team to turnaround as they have a lot of talent in duplicative roles. Much easier to have that than the Sharks problem of just not having talent at all.
How exactly are the Sabres getting a true #1C? Byram and Power aren't returning one. You don't get a 1C for parts unless he's old and has other issues (ie JT Miller).

I would much much rather be the Sharks, who have a franchise two-way centerman. There is no piece more valuable and critical to team-building. Everything else can be acquired elsewhere.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DG93 and Sandisfan
Untouchable was maybe too strong a word, but Benson is two things: 1) the type of player you win with and 2) never going to get the value in a trade that he has on-ice. Ergo, virtually untouchable in my book. Dahlin could be traded but it would have to be for a legitimate real #1C, someone better than Pettersson, and that player isn't available. When I think of centers who could pull Dahlin in a trade, with age and contract all figured in, it's like. Celebrini (which we wouldn't do), maybe Stutzle, Mackinnon, Barkov, Bedard if you consider him a center, and Hughes if you consider him a center. Matthews and McDavid are too close to UFA and Crosby is too old. So he's not getting traded.
Why do you think Benson is someone you win with? He's never won anything save a Hlinka gold. In junior his teams didnt win anything despite finishing atop their conference each season, and now he's done nothing to help the Sabres improve. I know you really like the player, but i don't see how one can make that conclusion since "a guy you win with", you know, wins.

Aside, I'm kinda weary of anyone from the Sabres who isn't Thompson or Dahlin (so that means no one). This is the Sabres, literally the worst franchise of our lifetimes - I don't want anything they've touched that isn't a superstar-level talent, like Eichel was. I look at Cozens, 26 points and behind 3 dmen and f***ing Ryan McLeod on his own team..... if he couldn't make scoring work in Buffalo, a team with better talent ours, why do we think he'd be any better here.
 
Why do you think Benson is someone you win with? He's never won anything save a Hlinka gold. In junior his teams didnt win anything despite finishing atop their conference each season, and now he's done nothing to help the Sabres improve. I know you really like the player, but i don't see how one can make that conclusion since "a guy you win with", you know, wins.
You could quite literally say all of these things about Celebrini. Couldn't win at the U18 couldn't win at the U20, couldn't win at the Beanpot, couldn't with in the NCAA playoffs. Hockey is a team sport.

Zach Benson does all the little things it takes to win hockey games. Boards battles, forechecking, fighting in front of my net, getting under guys' skin. He can't help that he's a 19 year old winger on the f***ing Sabres. The Sharks are still in last place, so clearly Celebrini and Smith haven't done anything to help the Sharks improve.

Aside, I'm kinda weary of anyone from the Sabres who isn't Thompson or Dahlin (so that means no one). This is the Sabres, literally the worst franchise of our lifetimes - I don't want anything they've touched that isn't a superstar-level talent, like Eichel was. I look at Cozens, 26 points and behind 3 dmen and f***ing Ryan McLeod on his own team..... if he couldn't make scoring work in Buffalo, a team with better talent ours, why do we think he'd be any better here.
Sam Reinhart's best season in Buffalo was 65 points and he was absolutely not considered an elite talent. Fast-forward five years and he's a Selke-caliber 95 point forward with a Stanley Cup. Ryan O'Reilly scored 61 points and had a -23 rating the season before he was traded from Buffalo to St. Louis. Next season he puts up 77 points and hoists a Stanley Cup as an elite two-way 1C. Nikita Zadorov, Brayden McNabb, Jake McCabe, and Will Borden were much maligned defensemen in Buffalo designated "not part of the solution", but that's a Cup-caliber bottom-4 defense group.

Recent history is full of former Sabres who bust out after leaving Buffalo. Together, that locker room is a mess, but you can absolutely pluck a single guy out and reform him. Smart teams will do that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mogambomoroo
You could quite literally say all of these things about Celebrini. Couldn't win at the U18 couldn't win at the U20, couldn't win at the Beanpot, couldn't with in the NCAA playoffs. Hockey is a team sport.

Zach Benson does all the little things it takes to win hockey games. Boards battles, forechecking, fighting in front of my net, getting under guys' skin. He can't help that he's a 19 year old winger on the f***ing Sabres. The Sharks are still in last place, so clearly Celebrini and Smith haven't done anything to help the Sharks improve.

I guess, but i dont see people saying that about Celebrini, or anyone who isn't a proven winner. I see them saying intangible things that are backed by his play, like he's a 200ft player, is strong on the puck for his size, has elite skating, etc. Your Benson attributes are accurate, but it seems premature to assign a "guy you win with" tag on him. You say that about a guy like M Tkachuk, who has those attributes and actually is a proven winner at every level. Similarly, all those attributes also describe Jumbo, who you would never add a winner tag to.

I don't think negatively about Benson, my point, and why i asked this question, is that I am super cautious of former Sabres property, especially career Sabres, and am unsure why people are quick to give career Sabres any sort of charitable break, or in this case, ascribe as to something they when they havent earned it. The Sabres are going backwards, after all (unlike the Sharks).

Sam Reinhart's best season in Buffalo was 65 points and he was absolutely not considered an elite talent. Fast-forward five years and he's a Selke-caliber 95 point forward with a Stanley Cup. Ryan O'Reilly scored 61 points and had a -23 rating the season before he was traded from Buffalo to St. Louis. Next season he puts up 77 points and hoists a Stanley Cup as an elite two-way 1C. Nikita Zadorov, Brayden McNabb, Jake McCabe, and Will Borden were much maligned defensemen in Buffalo designated "not part of the solution", but that's a Cup-caliber bottom-4 defense group.

Recent history is full of former Sabres who bust out after leaving Buffalo. Together, that locker room is a mess, but you can absolutely pluck a single guy out and reform him. Smart teams will do that.
I hear you, but i'm not sold on the idea that just because it worked for Eichel (2OA), Reinhart (2OA), ROR (elite defensive forward before BUF), it will work for guys with far lower pedigrees. To be more direct, a guy like Cozens, a career Sabre, scares me as a target, because at best he's a 2nd line player and at worst he eats cap space and blocks a homegrown C talent from getting reps.

Smart teams add these "distressed" assets while in pursuit of a cup and these pieces can be surrounded by talent, not with tons of holes in the lineup. We aren't in that position.

Also, Zadorov, McNabb, and Borgen all played under one season's worth of games Buffalo, idk why they are relevant here. I also don't see how they could be "much maligned" in such a short period of time on a dogshit team. PLUS, Zadorov was traded for ROR, Borgen was an expansion draft pick, and McNabb was traded while in the AHL. These players are only relevant if we're talking about trading for Kulich or Helenius.

Again, all of this is to say, I am extremely cautious about picking fruit from the Sabres' rotted tree
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad