If you have concerns about his size regarding off-puck play, Lombardi would be much better served going all gas no brakes on offense. f*** the battles and ball out. He's never going to be a guy that dominates board battles so ignore them and score like your hockey life depends on it.It's not about being a Selke player. It's that there is literally a minimum threshold in the NHL for play off the puck (with the exception given to a handful of very elite offensive players). It will be critical for Lombardi to meet this threshold in order to be an NHLer, otherwise his offense will be irrelevant and he will remain an AHL player, like so many others who didn't reach that minimum threshold.
I'm all for him getting top-6 minutes in the A, but I'm more concerned about his off-puck play, given his size. Guys his size can make it, but it's more difficult, and certain aspects of their games will be justifiably more scrutinized.
I did not enjoy Andreas Athanasiou the first time around though.If you have concerns about his size regarding off-puck play, Lombardi would be much better served going all gas no brakes on offense. f*** the battles and ball out. He's never going to be a guy that dominates board battles so ignore them and score like your hockey life depends on it.
Do you want to watch Lombardi chip n chase or do you want to watch Lombardi hit dingers? I vote dingers...I did not enjoy Andreas Athanasiou the first time around though.
He doesn't need to dominate board battles, but he also cannot just bail out on them (I'll give him a pass if he turns into a 100-point player). And board battles are only one facet off off-puck play. How's the backcheck? How's the forecheck? How's the general effort level without the puck? How's the positioning? How's the reads? The list goes on. These things matter in the NHL, no matter how much offense you bring. And, collectively, there is a minimal level a player needs to be at, which is made more difficult when you're smaller.
My preference for Lombardi is that he reaches his full potential. And his full potential includes being at least adequate in most facets of the game. Losing every puck battle is just not good enough. And if you were to ask Lombardi he'd say the same.
If we're distilling this all down to chip 'n chase vs. score goals, then you got me nick, I vote score goals!Do you want to watch Lombardi chip n chase or do you want to watch Lombardi hit dingers? I vote dingers...
AA never fought once and would have got ragdolled. What gives you that idea for either one of them?Fast, good hands, could fight, not smart. Is that how you see Lombardi?
My point was that they are different kind of players, you can't compare them.AA never fought once and would have got ragdolled. What gives you that idea for either one of them?
My point was that they are different kind of players, you can't compare them.
No I didn't, I made sarcastic comment that you can't compare themYet you compared AA to Lombardi? Are you drunk?
I haven't watched a game yet this year, but even last year he played a good amount of minutes. I wouldn't look at how a social media team lists lines on game day as gospel to their playing time though. He's on special teams, he's lighting it up, its safe to say he's getting plenty of ice time this yearIs he playing top or second line center? If yes it's good , but if he is third line player, not good at all, it's means he doesn't have skilled players around him