Grade the move - Hiring Jim Montgomery | Page 2 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Grade the move - Hiring Jim Montgomery

Hiring Jim Montgomery to be the next coach of the Boston Bruins out of the available candidates

  • A

    Votes: 33 26.6%
  • A-

    Votes: 20 16.1%
  • B+

    Votes: 42 33.9%
  • B

    Votes: 18 14.5%
  • B-

    Votes: 1 0.8%
  • C+

    Votes: 1 0.8%
  • C

    Votes: 4 3.2%
  • C-

    Votes: 2 1.6%
  • D

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • F

    Votes: 3 2.4%

  • Total voters
    124
Obviously we can’t accurately grade it now.

But just like the Entry Draft or a TDL, we can issue a judgment on how it seems right now considering what we know at the moment. For me, Montgomery checks all the boxes. Success at lower levels? Check. Outside the organization? Check. Seems to get a lot out of unsuspecting rosters? Sure seems to. A true change up to Cassidy instead of “more of the same, but worse”? You bet.

As of today, I really like the hire. He was my target from the get-go before anyone was really talking about him. Could I be completely wrong about him? Absolutely 100%. But I’m okay being wrong. The upcoming season has already become interesting for me, despite my feelings about what I expect to be a static roster. That’s a win in my book.
 
Based on who was available and their records I think it’s an A. Montgomery was the best coach available with the highest ceiling. That doesn’t mean I think he’ll win 5 cups with the Bruins, I just think he’s most likely the best pickup for this team. Looking forward to seeing what he can do with some of the players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff
Did you consider Cassidy an upgrade over Julien? Thing is every coach has a shelf life no matter how good someone thinks they are and it looked like Cassidy's time was up.

I'm sure Cassidy will do good in Vegas until he becomes stale then they'll move on and probably "downgrade" from him. Just the way the coaching game works.
Julien>Cassidy
 
I gave it a B based on who it isn't. Not Cassidy or Quinn. Still would liked Leach to have gotten a shot. Montgomery I can't really grade until I see what he does.

I am afraid of man to man D exposing how bad some of our defenseman actually are but we will see.
 
Julien>Cassidy

And the "downgrade" to capital cast-off Cassidy got the team better results. Julien was well over his expiration date and it showed.

You can have who ever is considered the best coach in the league and within a few years they're out. Whenever things start to fizzle out in Tampa Bay Cooper will be shown the door as well. Then the new guy might work out might not but change is always needed at some point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff
And the "downgrade" to capital cast-off Cassidy got the team better results. Julien was well over his expiration date and it showed.

You can have who ever is considered the best coach in the league and within a few years they're out. Whenever things start to fizzle out in Tampa Bay Cooper will be shown the door as well. Then the new guy might work out might not but change is always needed at some point.
Cassidy got them better results? Julien was the coach of the only Stanley Cup in the last 50 years and took them to 2 out of the 3 cups they’ve been to since 1990.
 
Can't say I know enough about him or his style to give a grade until after at least a chunk of the season if not more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff
Cassidy got them better results? Julien was the coach of the only Stanley Cup in the last 50 years and took them to 2 out of the 3 cups they’ve been to since 1990.

I meant at the end of Juliens tenure 🙄 been watching the Bruins since 92 so I'm well aware of what he did. No history lesson needed
 
Did you consider Cassidy an upgrade over Julien? Thing is every coach has a shelf life no matter how good someone thinks they are and it looked like Cassidy's time was up.

I'm sure Cassidy will do good in Vegas until he becomes stale then they'll move on and probably "downgrade" from him. Just the way the coaching game works.
Yes I know that every coach has a shelf life. But some coaches are better than others from the start of their time with teams. Cassidy was not an upgrade over Julien and Monty is not a better coach than Cassidy. Trotz would have been a better coach than Cassidy.
 
He has to grind out a bunch of points and keep us near the 8 spot with half of our good players out for 2 months so we'll know pretty early on this one.

I really am skeptical about our depth so we'll see. I'm not suare Trotz wasn't the better choice if going outside the organization but Dallas had a couple nice runs his 2 years there.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm going to go with "to new to evaluate" on this one. I will say I like what I've read/heard about Monty and his impact on helping young guys develop at the NHL level. Sounds like he was a big part of both Thomas and Kyrou breaking out this past season, so I'm hopeful he can help a guy like Studincka or Frederic find their games to help reach their potential.

I'll be interested to see what he does with the line-up and the combinations he rolls out. Maybe I'm wrong but with a new coach in town feels like a big opportunity for all the players are the team that maybe weren't happy with how they were used last year or previous years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff
Yes I know that every coach has a shelf life. But some coaches are better than others from the start of their time with teams. Cassidy was not an upgrade over Julien and Monty is not a better coach than Cassidy. Trotz would have been a better coach than Cassidy.
Trotz didn't want to coach this season, so....not sure why we're even discussing that
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff and Ladyfan
Now is not the time to be grading the hire , what I think the grade would be hire than some of the other names put out there................. I feel the most important grade is the roster he is going to be given ,that will be interesting.......Sweeney has the security with his new contract , now which way will he go ...... safe or aggressive .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff
Now is not the time to be grading the hire , what I think the grade would be hire than some of the other names put out there................. I feel the most important grade is the roster he is going to be given ,that will be interesting.......Sweeney has the security with his new contract , now which way will he go ...... safe or aggressive .
Why can’t we grade the hire now? Obviously we would evaluate the hire later as well. We all know that if Quinn were hired people wouldn’t be saying we should withhold grading the hire until later.
 
Love is a long road.

This season is going to be a long road.

People who post here are intelligent, most are educated, everyone is passionate, opinionated, and we all have our expectations, hopes and dreams for our favorite hockey team. It is what makes us one the most astute fan bases in all of sports.



New England sports fans are not satisfied with simply winning and making the playoffs, New England sports fans have grown to expect championships. We expect results. The Bruins have played in the Stanley Cup finals 20 times and won 6.



Since I have been a fan of this team (1967-68 I started following / 6 years old) they have appeared in the finals 10 times and won 3. 7 other times they lost in the conference finals. Only 8 times did they fail to qualify during that span; qualifying 47 times. We have been spoiled, is it any wonder our expectations are so high? And that is just within hockey circles and not taking into consideration of the success of the city's/region's other sports teams upon our expectations.



I have seen many coaches come and go; some good, some not so good. But every new season regardless of who is behind the bench my expectations remain the same - win; make the playoffs, win the Stanley Cup. The regular season is a qualifying round. It doesn't matter where you finish as long as you make the playoffs. The ultimate goal is the Cup. Once in, it's all about matchups and a whole lot of hoping and praying that things fall your way. Very rarely have the Bruins ever been 'favorites' to win the cup.



It has been a long road.



Welcome Jim Montgomery! Don Sweeney, despite some other head scratching moves, ineptness/hesitancy, previous successes, and at times inability to grasp the obvious, appears to have made a sound choice by selecting Montgomery to be the next coach of the Boston Bruins. Others here have previously listed Montgomery's accomplishments, spoken of his previous coaching style, and his previous player relationships. Reviewing everything sports related he appears to be a winner at different levels throughout his career. And when one has been a repeated winner at any level it creates expectations - expectations for one's self and expectations of those around you. Winning breeds winning.



Sweeney, while maybe not really wanting to fire Cassidy, came to realize that is was time for a change. Cassidy was successful and is a good coach but change was at hand, a pruning of the plant if you will. With Montgomery there will be a new energy/vibration in the room, an excitement of expectations, and a fresh start for all the players. And most importantly, the continued expectation and tradition of winning (past track record at different levels).



As far as choice of hire - I'll grade 'the hire' itself a solid 'A-'.



Montgomery does not come without his concerns, and there are risks with any individual who is hired to perform a job. We all know the general reasons for why he was let go in Dallas. But I am a firm believer in second chances, from learning from one's mistakes, maturation and self-discipline. By all accounts he has taken steps to correct the situation in his personal life and keep it under control. We as fans need to extend our support and understanding the same way we would to a person with cancer in remission. His coaching knowledge and ability make him a very qualified choice; his demons aside. As fans we need to be mindful to keep the two separate; the professional and the individual. We are part of one of the best fan bases in all of sports, let's show the world why with our respect and class.



As others have said - there is no way to grade his impact upon the team until there is a body of work to evaluate. Some have said they need to wait until Thanksgiving, others until after those injured are back in the line up, and a few until after the season. I am of the mind set of wanting to hold off judgment/evaluation until this time next year. Under the circumstances this seems only fair. There may be struggles this year, especially early on ... this should be something as knowledgeable fans that we understand is a real possibility regardless of who is the coach. We are a reactionary passionate fan base ... how a team handles adversity may show more about it's character and leadership than smooth sailing; same could be said for it's fan base.



Still, there is a new season on the horizon and my hope for a successful campaign once again springs eternal. There is a long way to go until the drop of the first puck and a lot can change between then and now. I won't stop believing, I won't stop hoping. Bruins hockey is in my blood; love is a long long road.
 
I give it a B to B+ as an initial grade

Its a good hire in terms of someone that can relate/handle vets and youth
 
If we're grading it in a vacuum as filling the open coaching position and taking the question of should they have fired Bruce out of the equation, it's the best they could've done (assuming Trotz was never a serious option).

I'm ecstatic that it wasn't Quinn, and I definitely preferred an outsider with new ideas like Monty to Leach (though I'm sure he'll be a fine coach somewhere, maybe San Jose?).

There are a lot of unknowns and we'll have to see how it plays out. I'm confident with A-.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ladyfan and Gordoff

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad