Yup.Picking U.S to win it, Sweden had their chance.
Picking U.S to win it, Sweden had their chance.
I'm banking on them killing it off and getting the momentum from it.Kinda risky when Sweden starts it 4-3. If they don't score on the PP time that's left then the US should be able to win it.
I'm a bit biased of course, but that was a clear tripping IMO. Stick between the legs. Unnecessary, but nonetheless it's a pretty clear 2 minutes.Gonna be tough to swallow for USNDTP if this ends on the 4 on 3. Little surprised by the call but that’s IIHF. Heck of a game regardless. Great response from the Americans after a pretty brutal second period.
I agree. Both calls were fine. If you are gonna call one, you have to call the other.I'm a bit biased of course, but that was a clear tripping IMO. Stick between the legs. Unnecessary, but nonetheless it's a pretty clear 2 minutes.
Yup. ^^ This is the best take. ^^Kinda risky when Sweden starts it 4-3. If they don't score on the PP time that's left then the US should be able to win it.
Thanks!
Yup. ^^ This is the best take. ^^
Thanks!
Yes it goes to 4 on 4 after the penalty until the next whistle. Same thing in NHL regular season OT.The better question is, if the US kills of the penetly but there isn't a whistle. Are Sweden allowed to have 4 men on the ice until the whistle blows?
Yes, the U.S. player will come out and it will be 4 on 4 until a whistle.The better question is, if the US kills of the penetly but there isn't a whistle. Are Sweden allowed to have 4 men on the ice until the whistle blows?