GDT: GM14 | Vancouver Canucks vs Calgary Flames | Tue. Nov 12th | 7:00pm PST | SNP | Lekkerimaki Time

Status
Not open for further replies.

SillyRabbit

Trix Are For Kids
Jan 3, 2006
8,964
8,925
Hughes has been carrying the team on his back for weeks now. He can't do it forever.
Both can be true. He's been our best player so I'm fine to give him a pass as he's likely to score or set up a goal later in the game anyway.

But if our top pairing is giving up goals like that, what do we think the other pairings are going to do?

I'd love for us to get a really strong defensive defenceman to pair with Hughes and put Hronek on the second pairing.

Having two offensive minded defenceman on our top pairing never really made a ton of sense to me.
 

Regress2TheMeme

Registered User
Mar 14, 2018
1,240
1,400
Hronek has generally been pretty good, but he’s being extra indecisive with the puck. Just shoot it sometimes man

I think sometimes he's waiting for traffic to get to the net before he shoots it. Makes him look like his controller has disconnected for a second.
 

Lemmiwinks

Registered User
Jun 11, 2011
2,094
836
B.C.
Both can be true. He's been our best player so I'm fine to give him a pass as he's likely to score or set up a goal later in the game anyway.

But if our top pairing is giving up goals like that, what do we think the other pairings are going to do?

I'd love for us to get a really strong defensive defenceman to pair with Hughes and put Hronek on the second pairing.

Having two offensive minded defenceman on our top pairing never really made a ton of sense to me.
‘Giving up goals like that’ ?? It was a flukey goal against.
 

Quinton Byfield

Registered User
Jul 25, 2021
365
907
Petey looked good, team had the better run of play but Calgary has had some rush chances. Should be able to come back, not particularly worried.

Only issue again is the stark difference in puck moving when Hughes is on/off the ice. He’s the best in the league at it, but the other two pairings are absolutely miserable at it outside of Brannstrom. It’s not surprising Miller’s production has gone down now that he’s not starting every shift with Hughes.

Real question is how long they can hang out without an upgrade in that spot, especially with Boeser out.
Well, good news is that they seem to want to double down on size and physicality, and don't seem to think Brannstrom has to be an every game hockey player, according to tweets today :eyeroll:
 

Peen

Rejoicing in a Benning-free world
Oct 6, 2013
31,481
27,753
this game is going to end like 5-2 vancouver man this team played pretty well and calgary will hit that wall halfway thru the game
 
  • Like
Reactions: MS

SillyRabbit

Trix Are For Kids
Jan 3, 2006
8,964
8,925
‘Giving up goals like that’ ?? It was a flukey goal against.
No it wasn't?

Hughes failed to clear out the rebound properly and handed the puck directly to Kirkland.

Let's take our homer glasses off for a second.

Critcism of a single play doesn't mean I'm saying Hughes sucks at hockey.
 

bbud

Registered User
Sep 10, 2008
11,530
3,948
BC
Jets are 15-1. I think this is their year.

Would love to see it, honestly. It's been too long, and I could never cheer for Edmonton, Calgary or Toronto.
Long season yet injuries hit at some point and you want to be playing like this in April ways to go
That said I'd like every Canadian team In playoffs ok maybe not coilers lol
 

logan5

Registered User
May 24, 2011
6,679
4,837
Vancouver - Mt. Pleasant
Maybe Landon could use a voice coach. He does sound like Kermit the Frog.

I think that's what Dave Randorf did. When I first heard him doing a Tampa game, he sounded totally different. It was an improvement.
 

Lemmiwinks

Registered User
Jun 11, 2011
2,094
836
B.C.
No it wasn't?

Hughes failed to clear out the rebound properly and handed the puck directly to Kirkland.

Let's take our homer glasses off for a second.

Critcism of a single play doesn't mean I'm saying Hughes sucks at hockey.
He tried to clear a bouncing puck to the corner and flubbed it and it went directly to Kirkland. It happens. It wasn’t some kind of defensive breakdown. Not a play that suggests we need to break up the Hughes-Hronek pair.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad