VanillaCoke
Registered User
- Oct 30, 2013
- 26,182
- 12,869
Epoch! Happy birthday pal
Yeah, this has been on my mind. How does a goalie with a chronic injury make it through four playoff rounds?That should absolutely be the plan. Demko needs to be eased in, and then workload managed. Especially with Lankinen playing the way he is.
Happy birthday man! Always enjoy your posts here!!Today is my birthday, 39 years young.
Joined this forum when I was a young 20, great to be here with you guys.
Yeah, this has been on my mind. How does a goalie with a chronic injury make it through four playoff rounds?
Happy birthday man! Always enjoy your posts here!!
It’s funny. It feels like everyone on the Canucks board is a friend of mine but we don’t even know each other’s names or we could pass each other on the street and not know it’s someone we interact with
Yeah, this has been on my mind. How does a goalie with a chronic injury make it through four playoff rounds?
I think by resting him lots in the regular season so he’s ready for a big run is the answer (hopefully).
This board has seen me graduate high school, university and get married in the time I’ve been here. Some of my best Internet friends are hereSo many of us have quite literally grown up together on here. Marriages, kids (the tough stuff too, but trying to keep the good vibes going)
It's the only real option, clearly. But there's a cost to playing a goalie like Demko 30-40 games a season and it's not necessarily easy to find a 1B who is willing to live with no real prospect of playoff starts, or easy to find a good one period -- Lankinen's availability and performance have been incredible opportunities/strokes of luck.I think by resting him lots in the regular season so he’s ready for a big run is the answer (hopefully).
Absolutely. I was thinking this morning that within a few weeks, signing Lankinen long term this summer might be the outcome I consider most likely.At this point it's honestly a big assumption to even assume that his level of play will rebound to the point where he's be starting over Lankinen in Game 1 of this year's playoffs.
It's the only real option, clearly. But there's a cost to playing a goalie like Demko 30-40 games a season and it's not necessarily easy to find a 1B who is willing to live with no real prospect of playoff starts, or easy to find a good one period -- Lankinen's availability and performance have been incredible opportunities/strokes of luck.
Absolutely. I was thinking this morning that within a few weeks, signing Lankinen long term this summer might be the outcome I consider most likely.
Today is my birthday, 39 years young.
Joined this forum when I was a young 20, great to be here with you guys.
Yep, I was thinking he might be LTIRed this offseason and the goaltending position basically revamped.I don't see how we don't.
This is 3 straight years now where we haven't been able to rely on Demko. His injury basically cost us the 22-23 season, it cost us horribly in the 2024 playoffs, and it would have destroyed this season if not for Lankinen. There are lots of potential avenues going forward, but to me the one thing that is absolutely *not* an option is ever going back to a Demko-DeSmith type situation again with the expectation that Demko starts 50-60 games paired with a 'typical backup'. You just can't, even if that's what most people expect will happen. Demko's health can't be trusted.
The notion that we sign Lankinen for 2-3 years at $4 million or something to platoon with Demko certainly seems like the most likely outcome. But a) Lankinen might be pricing himself out of that range, and b) we'll have to make cuts elsewhere on the roster to accommodate $9 million in goalies for next year with the OEL penalty also going up.
I legit wonder if Demko will be here in 25-26, whether it's because his knee situation necessitates LTIR (we'll see how he plays and how much he can play when he returns) or we make a trade and move on and go with Lankinen moving forward. It's a fascinating situation right now. And a good one for this season, but a bit of a frightening one for future seasons.
I don't see how we don't.
This is 3 straight years now where we haven't been able to rely on Demko. His injury basically cost us the 22-23 season, it cost us horribly in the 2024 playoffs, and it would have destroyed this season if not for Lankinen. There are lots of potential avenues going forward, but to me the one thing that is absolutely *not* an option is ever going back to a Demko-DeSmith type situation again with the expectation that Demko starts 50-60 games paired with a 'typical backup'. You just can't, even if that's what most people expect will happen. Demko's health can't be trusted.
The notion that we sign Lankinen for 2-3 years at $4 million or something to platoon with Demko certainly seems like the most likely outcome. But a) Lankinen might be pricing himself out of that range, and b) we'll have to make cuts elsewhere on the roster to accommodate $9 million in goalies for next year with the OEL penalty also going up.
I legit wonder if Demko will be here in 25-26, whether it's because his knee situation necessitates LTIR (we'll see how he plays and how much he can play when he returns) or we make a trade and move on and go with Lankinen moving forward. It's a fascinating situation right now. And a good one for this season, but a bit of a frightening one for future seasons.
Yep, I was thinking he might be LTIRed this offseason and the goaltending position basically revamped.
It's funny, the attitude toward Demko of late has been, "Oh well, we'll see him when we see him" without a lot of serious consideration of a future without him. At this point he hasn't been able to play in well over 6 months.
Yep, I was thinking he might be LTIRed this offseason and the goaltending position basically revamped.
It's funny, the attitude toward Demko of late has been, "Oh well, we'll see him when we see him" without a lot of serious consideration of a future without him. At this point he hasn't been able to play in well over 6 months.
I think it's time to put the possibility of reconstructing the position right up there with how he may perform when he's back. My point is that this discussion has been curiously absent considering the trajectory of his injuries so far. It's already being leaked that he's going to be at some sort of "new normal," and probably a compromising one if it bears mentioning at all.Mostly because you can't make any plans about what to do about the future until you know the status of his health/play. Everything should be on the table but you'll have no idea which direction makes sense for a while still.
I think it's time to put the possibility of reconstructing the position right up there with how he may perform when he's back. My point is that this discussion has been curiously absent considering the trajectory of his injuries so far. It's already being leaked that he's going to be at some sort of "new normal," and probably a compromising one if it bears mentioning at all.