Pre-Game Talk: GM13 | Vancouver Canucks vs Edmonton Oilers | Sat. Nov 9th | 7:00pm PST | HNIC/SNP | Do It For Brocky

Angry Little Elf

My wife came back
Apr 9, 2012
9,157
9,109
Victoria B.C.
Today is my birthday, 39 years young.

Joined this forum when I was a young 20, great to be here with you guys.
Happy birthday man! Always enjoy your posts here!!

It’s funny. It feels like everyone on the Canucks board is a friend of mine but we don’t even know each other’s names or we could pass each other on the street and not know it’s someone we interact with
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bgav

Mr. Canucklehead

Kitimat Canuck
Dec 14, 2002
42,479
37,862
Kitimat, BC
Happy birthday man! Always enjoy your posts here!!

It’s funny. It feels like everyone on the Canucks board is a friend of mine but we don’t even know each other’s names or we could pass each other on the street and not know it’s someone we interact with

So many of us have quite literally grown up together on here. Marriages, kids (the tough stuff too, but trying to keep the good vibes going)
 

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
55,838
92,123
Vancouver, BC
Yeah, this has been on my mind. How does a goalie with a chronic injury make it through four playoff rounds?

I think by resting him lots in the regular season so he’s ready for a big run is the answer (hopefully).

At this point it's honestly a big assumption to even assume that his level of play will rebound to the point where he's be starting over Lankinen in Game 1 of this year's playoffs.
 

bandwagonesque

I eat Kraft Dinner and I vote
Mar 5, 2014
7,524
5,906
I think by resting him lots in the regular season so he’s ready for a big run is the answer (hopefully).
It's the only real option, clearly. But there's a cost to playing a goalie like Demko 30-40 games a season and it's not necessarily easy to find a 1B who is willing to live with no real prospect of playoff starts, or easy to find a good one period -- Lankinen's availability and performance have been incredible opportunities/strokes of luck.

At this point it's honestly a big assumption to even assume that his level of play will rebound to the point where he's be starting over Lankinen in Game 1 of this year's playoffs.
Absolutely. I was thinking this morning that within a few weeks, signing Lankinen long term this summer might be the outcome I consider most likely.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Angry Little Elf

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
55,838
92,123
Vancouver, BC
It's the only real option, clearly. But there's a cost to playing a goalie like Demko 30-40 games a season and it's not necessarily easy to find a 1B who is willing to live with no real prospect of playoff starts, or easy to find a good one period -- Lankinen's availability and performance have been incredible opportunities/strokes of luck.


Absolutely. I was thinking this morning that within a few weeks, signing Lankinen long term this summer might be the outcome I consider most likely.

I don't see how we don't.

This is 3 straight years now where we haven't been able to rely on Demko. His injury basically cost us the 22-23 season, it cost us horribly in the 2024 playoffs, and it would have destroyed this season if not for Lankinen. There are lots of potential avenues going forward, but to me the one thing that is absolutely *not* an option is ever going back to a Demko-DeSmith type situation again with the expectation that Demko starts 50-60 games paired with a 'typical backup'. You just can't, even if that's what most people expect will happen. Demko's health can't be trusted.

The notion that we sign Lankinen for 2-3 years at $4 million or something to platoon with Demko certainly seems like the most likely outcome. But a) Lankinen might be pricing himself out of that range, and b) we'll have to make cuts elsewhere on the roster to accommodate $9 million in goalies for next year with the OEL penalty also going up.

I legit wonder if Demko will be here in 25-26, whether it's because his knee situation necessitates LTIR (we'll see how he plays and how much he can play when he returns) or we make a trade and move on and go with Lankinen moving forward. It's a fascinating situation right now. And a good one for this season, but a bit of a frightening one for future seasons.
 

bandwagonesque

I eat Kraft Dinner and I vote
Mar 5, 2014
7,524
5,906
I don't see how we don't.

This is 3 straight years now where we haven't been able to rely on Demko. His injury basically cost us the 22-23 season, it cost us horribly in the 2024 playoffs, and it would have destroyed this season if not for Lankinen. There are lots of potential avenues going forward, but to me the one thing that is absolutely *not* an option is ever going back to a Demko-DeSmith type situation again with the expectation that Demko starts 50-60 games paired with a 'typical backup'. You just can't, even if that's what most people expect will happen. Demko's health can't be trusted.

The notion that we sign Lankinen for 2-3 years at $4 million or something to platoon with Demko certainly seems like the most likely outcome. But a) Lankinen might be pricing himself out of that range, and b) we'll have to make cuts elsewhere on the roster to accommodate $9 million in goalies for next year with the OEL penalty also going up.

I legit wonder if Demko will be here in 25-26, whether it's because his knee situation necessitates LTIR (we'll see how he plays and how much he can play when he returns) or we make a trade and move on and go with Lankinen moving forward. It's a fascinating situation right now. And a good one for this season, but a bit of a frightening one for future seasons.
Yep, I was thinking he might be LTIRed this offseason and the goaltending position basically revamped.

It's funny, the attitude toward Demko of late has been, "Oh well, we'll see him when we see him" without a lot of serious consideration of a future without him. At this point he hasn't been able to play in well over 6 months.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MS

SeawaterOnIce

Bald is back in style.
Sponsor
Aug 28, 2011
17,975
22,687
I don't see how we don't.

This is 3 straight years now where we haven't been able to rely on Demko. His injury basically cost us the 22-23 season, it cost us horribly in the 2024 playoffs, and it would have destroyed this season if not for Lankinen. There are lots of potential avenues going forward, but to me the one thing that is absolutely *not* an option is ever going back to a Demko-DeSmith type situation again with the expectation that Demko starts 50-60 games paired with a 'typical backup'. You just can't, even if that's what most people expect will happen. Demko's health can't be trusted.

The notion that we sign Lankinen for 2-3 years at $4 million or something to platoon with Demko certainly seems like the most likely outcome. But a) Lankinen might be pricing himself out of that range, and b) we'll have to make cuts elsewhere on the roster to accommodate $9 million in goalies for next year with the OEL penalty also going up.

I legit wonder if Demko will be here in 25-26, whether it's because his knee situation necessitates LTIR (we'll see how he plays and how much he can play when he returns) or we make a trade and move on and go with Lankinen moving forward. It's a fascinating situation right now. And a good one for this season, but a bit of a frightening one for future seasons.


I always thought the trade rumors in 2023 was management testing the waters to see what a Demko trade would look like. The media put the whole rebuild/fire sale spin on it.
 

Vector

Moderator
Feb 2, 2007
27,534
46,737
Junktown
Yep, I was thinking he might be LTIRed this offseason and the goaltending position basically revamped.

It's funny, the attitude toward Demko of late has been, "Oh well, we'll see him when we see him" without a lot of serious consideration of a future without him. At this point he hasn't been able to play in well over 6 months.

Mostly because you can't make any plans about what to do about the future until you know the status of his health/play. Everything should be on the table but you'll have no idea which direction makes sense for a while still.
 

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
55,838
92,123
Vancouver, BC
Yep, I was thinking he might be LTIRed this offseason and the goaltending position basically revamped.

It's funny, the attitude toward Demko of late has been, "Oh well, we'll see him when we see him" without a lot of serious consideration of a future without him. At this point he hasn't been able to play in well over 6 months.

Lankinen is probably playing better right now than Demko did last year.

My realization over the last month has been like 'f*** me, this guy can't be trusted, and with the nature of his injury we'll probably never be able to trust him again'.

You obviously want to see Lankinen in a bit bigger sample size but if he's still .920ing and playing like this after 40 games, there might be some tough decisions that need to be made.
 

bandwagonesque

I eat Kraft Dinner and I vote
Mar 5, 2014
7,524
5,906
Mostly because you can't make any plans about what to do about the future until you know the status of his health/play. Everything should be on the table but you'll have no idea which direction makes sense for a while still.
I think it's time to put the possibility of reconstructing the position right up there with how he may perform when he's back. My point is that this discussion has been curiously absent considering the trajectory of his injuries so far. It's already being leaked that he's going to be at some sort of "new normal," and probably a compromising one if it bears mentioning at all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MS

Vector

Moderator
Feb 2, 2007
27,534
46,737
Junktown
I think it's time to put the possibility of reconstructing the position right up there with how he may perform when he's back. My point is that this discussion has been curiously absent considering the trajectory of his injuries so far. It's already being leaked that he's going to be at some sort of "new normal," and probably a compromising one if it bears mentioning at all.

There's just no real discussion to be had only pure speculation. Kind of putting the cart before the horse.

The main thing that can be gleamed from all this is that, even if healthy and playing close to what he's capable of, he's a platoon goalie going forward. Lower-body can't handle what's needed and has been that way since his time in the NCAA.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad