Regress2TheMeme Registered User Mar 14, 2018 1,169 1,313 Yesterday at 9:18 PM #803 Definitely not goal
MS 1%er Mar 18, 2002 55,451 90,697 Vancouver, BC Yesterday at 9:18 PM #804 The shouldn’t even be debatable. Cut and dried no goal. Reactions: Coffees, Forgotusername, Vector and 2 others
credulous Registered User Nov 18, 2021 3,890 5,133 Yesterday at 9:18 PM #805 that will get called back but i think the puck was in before the push
cc Registered User Feb 28, 2002 9,947 1,826 Yesterday at 9:18 PM #806 Pushes the pad in. That should be disallowed
Reverend Mayhem Tell me all your thoughts on God Feb 15, 2009 28,584 5,733 Port Coquitlam, BC Yesterday at 9:18 PM #807 EpochLink said: Looking at it back, this should not count Click to expand... atta lad
Baby Pettersson Moderator Mar 8, 2014 9,253 9,759 Saskatoon Yesterday at 9:18 PM #808 The curve on his stick says enough lol.
4th line culture Registered User Jan 11, 2020 529 770 Yesterday at 9:18 PM #809 Going to count because reasons
Flik Canucks fan for life Sponsor Apr 29, 2010 8,163 8,001 Vancouver, WA Yesterday at 9:18 PM #810 You're only allowed to do that against Luongo silly Lightning, get it together! Reactions: Brookbank
bandwagonesque I eat Kraft Dinner and I vote Mar 5, 2014 7,446 5,811 Yesterday at 9:19 PM #811 I honestly didn't know you couldn't push the goaltender's pad backward.
SillyRabbit Trix Are For Kids Jan 3, 2006 8,732 8,588 Yesterday at 9:19 PM #812 They'll call it no goal. Tampa's already up by 3.
PavelBure10 The Russian Rocket Aug 25, 2009 5,457 7,629 Okanagan Yesterday at 9:19 PM #813 I don't think it should count. He clearly pushes the pad rather than the puck.
Vector Moderator Feb 2, 2007 26,912 45,134 Junktown Yesterday at 9:19 PM #814 This will count purely because the NHL is terrible at this. Reactions: geebaan and wonton15
geebaan 7th round busted Oct 27, 2012 10,395 9,096 Yesterday at 9:19 PM #815 Are they arguing our player pushed him in?
SeawaterOnIce Bald is back in style. Sponsor Aug 28, 2011 17,746 22,328 Yesterday at 9:19 PM #816 Why is this taking so long?
WTG December 5th Jan 11, 2015 24,261 8,547 Pickle Time Deli & Market Yesterday at 9:19 PM #817 The steelman is that Silovs did not cover the puck so technically it's a "loose" puck. That's probably what they are looking at. Reactions: SeawaterOnIce
The steelman is that Silovs did not cover the puck so technically it's a "loose" puck. That's probably what they are looking at.
cc Registered User Feb 28, 2002 9,947 1,826 Yesterday at 9:19 PM #818 Why is this taking so long? It's bloody obvious
canucks20 Registered User Oct 12, 2009 1,902 1,240 Yesterday at 9:20 PM #819 I don’t get how this is taking so long. He pushes the pad clearly. Should be an easy no goal
LickTheEnvelope Weird time to be a Canucks fan 2024 Dec 16, 2008 39,001 6,133 Sidney, formerly Vancouver Yesterday at 9:20 PM #820 Oddly long review
Coffees Take one step towards the direction you want to go Nov 12, 2021 8,747 7,590 Yesterday at 9:20 PM #821 EpochLink said: Looking at it back, this should not count Click to expand... Good on ya mate
Regress2TheMeme Registered User Mar 14, 2018 1,169 1,313 Yesterday at 9:20 PM #822 If you look at the overhead angle you can see his stick torque as he pushes on the pad.
Brookbank Registered User Nov 15, 2022 2,093 2,013 Yesterday at 9:20 PM #823 bandwagonesque said: I honestly didn't know you couldn't push the goaltender's pad backward. Click to expand... I guess we are about to find out
bandwagonesque said: I honestly didn't know you couldn't push the goaltender's pad backward. Click to expand... I guess we are about to find out
WTG December 5th Jan 11, 2015 24,261 8,547 Pickle Time Deli & Market Yesterday at 9:20 PM #824 Another thing is that this goal on the ice so there needs to be conclusive evidence he was pushed in and that the puck wasn't just loose.
Another thing is that this goal on the ice so there needs to be conclusive evidence he was pushed in and that the puck wasn't just loose.