Hiring Holland would be stupid. Seems like something we might do
To what I've bolded, I think a lot of folks get hung up there.
I think Jarmo has built the roster toward being a certain kind of team, but the "identity" thing really only works when the team has success. It's hard for people to acknowledge a "skill" team when your team stinks.
See we're talking about intention versus execution. The team sucks, so it doesn't appear to have an identity. But there was a plan, it just thus far has failed. But that's two different conversations. It's a valid conversation in a thread titled "what do you want from the next GM" based on the referenced Weekes/Demers comments.I can say my identity is sexy male exotic dancer but if my diet is donuts and Cheetos and I don’t go to the gym, does it matter that I picked an identity?
I don’t know whether Jarmo didn’t have an identity and just reacted (my personal belief), Jarmo had an identity in mind but didn’t follow through (me as an exotic dancer), or Jarmo had an identity but was unable to put together a team and a coaching staff that could successfully implement that identity. I do know he had his hand forced on the Laine/Roslovic acquisitions and kind of lucked into Johnny Hockey. When he made deliberate moves entirely of his own choosing (Gudbranson, Severson, Provorov) the last few seasons, they don’t seem to have helped the team get better. I don’t feel like he has successfully built a coaching staff since Torts left.
Anyway, I would love a 6 month ban on Jarmo discussions. You morons will suck me into a Jarmo discussion every time if we don’t ban such things.
As a GM sure, but Bucci is suggesting him as a replacement for JD which could be OK since he has "been there and done that" in Detroit.Hiring Holland would be stupid. Seems like something we might do
See we're talking about intention versus execution. The team sucks, so it doesn't appear to have an identity. But there was a plan, it just thus far has failed. But that's two different conversations. It's a valid conversation in a thread titled "what do you want from the next GM" based on the referenced Weekes/Demers comments.
there was a clip last week of weekes and demers on nhl network talking about the jackets and how they currently lack an identity, and how finding an identity doesn't necessarily mean becoming a 'tough' team.
they specifically pointed to carolina as an example of a team whose identity is skill-based. doesn't mean they don't have two-way players (they do) but they have a system and identity that empowers their skill guys and leverages their talent.
darche, tulsky and macfarland all come from teams that have had success building a skill-first roster and supplementing with toughness at the margins. from a roster build standpoint, this makes the most sense for the jackets given who their current top pieces are.
the alternative path is trying to set a "hard to play against" identity a la john tortorella, and reshape the roster to fit that. which aligns with the current coaching staff, but requires significantly more player/salary movement. which is a significantly bigger undertaking for a new GM.
And Johnny.Sell Laine
Laine can go, It's too early to ditch GaudreauAnd Johnny.
31 next season. Play is declining every year. I’d get what we could for him.Laine can go, It's too early to ditch Gaudreau
Or the more likely scenario is that he went from playing on a team that was contending for the playoffs if not the West on a yearly basis, to the youngest team in the league in the middle of a rebuild. He's not the problem. He's not the person we're building around. And as long as he's hovering around a PPG, he's worth his contract.31 next season. Play is declining every year. I’d get what we could for him.
I think his numbers (and his age as you pointed out) since he signed his new contract would require close to a 50% (maximum allowed) retention of salary. I'd only think that he'd require a bad contract back in a player trade. I'd just suck it up and retain salary (if possible).31 next season. Play is declining every year. I’d get what we could for him.
Pulled out this part because...I think Jarmo was a good scout and talent evaluator. I'm not sure he hired people around him to shore up his shortcomings. So ideally you would find a GM who was aware of his strengths and weaknesses and hired good people to help in areas where they're not experts.
Why would hiring a "concierge" to assist players point to the org being second-rate? That is a completely bonkers way to read that. First-class organizations bend over backwards to serve their players. It's the ones that don't that would be considered second rate.Pulled out this part because...
We've had brief periods of revelatory (to whatever degree is debatable) stuff about how the organization is run. There was the bit a long time ago about the jet. Then a few years ago we had the whole let's hire sort of a concierge to improve the acclimation of players to the pros or the city or whatever. Whether steps taken on those topics have proven beneficial is also another conversation.
These things just speak to an overall second-rate kind of operation, whether that's a lack of understanding or lack of commitment to the cost I don't know. Anyway, I suppose the support in the player personnel department is another manifestation of that.
I don't mean to just "dump on" the organization. But I am trying to understand how we so often seem to fall short of hopes and expectations.
Certainly Priest would not be someone to lead the GM search. Despite his faults I have no issue with JD leading the GM hiring. He’s made two GM hires in his NHL career - Doug Armstrong and Jarmo. Army had a successful run culminating in a Cup and Jarmo had a good run until his run of poor decisions in the last few years. Yes, Jarmo could have been fired earlier, but we are talking about hiring, not firing. So based on those two hires, I feel JD knows what to look for in this search.This all sounds good to me.
I've never been a big JD guy but it seems wild to me that many folks think we can do this process better without him. To me that sounds like having Priest find a new hockey guy, and then that person finding the new GM. That could go badly. Let JD oversee the GM search and then he'll retire soon anyways.
Sorry fopr the lack of clarity. I was working out my thoughts while typing them. The previous modus operandi would have indicated a second-rate approach, in the way I was thinking through it. Sort of a "here is a thing we had to start doing that we weren't doing but probably should have been doing all along."Why would hiring a "concierge" to assist players point to the org being second-rate? That is a completely bonkers way to read that. First-class organizations bend over backwards to serve their players. It's the ones that don't that would be considered second rate.
Item No. 1: Davidson’s plan
It’s a fair question, but not an easy one: Blue Jackets president of hockey operations and now interim general manager John Davidson celebrated his 71st birthday last Tuesday. When he decides to retire, it’ll end one of the most unique careers in major sports.
What is Davidson thinking in that regard? Is his current undertaking with the Blue Jackets — running the NHL trade deadline later this week, finding the franchise’s next GM, etc. — his last hurrah before he rides off into the sunset?
“Ultimately, that’s all up to (club president) Mike Priest and the ownership group, whatever they want,” Davidson told The Athletic this week. “I just want to get us going. I just want to get us back on track. I haven’t even thought about retirement, to be honest.
“When we get it all straightened out, we’ll figure things out. I have a gigantic affinity for this franchise and our city. I just … I like a lot of things that are here. Now we need to get it to the next level.”
Asked if he planned to stay on until he felt the franchise was in good hands and headed in the right direction, Davidson said: “That’s it.”
For now, the focus is on the trade deadline, which arrives at 3 p.m. on Friday. The Blue Jackets are expected to be minor players, with only one significant unrestricted free agent (Jack Roslovic) on the roster and a cluster of young players trying to find their way in the league.
The search for Jarmo Kekäläinen’s replacement won’t begin in earnest until after the trade deadline, Davidson said. He said the Blue Jackets have been contacted by “dozens” of potential candidates in the three weeks since Kekäläinen was dismissed.
“There are young, up-and-coming people, there are experienced people, there are people who have done the job before and aren’t working now … everything from A to Z,” Davidson said. “We’re going to go through (the process), Mike Priest and I. Nothing is out of bounds and no ideas are wrong.
“Mike and I will have a strong discussion about what exactly we’re looking for. We’ve already had some discussions in that direction. When that’s in place — when we settle on the characteristics that we think will really benefit our club, in our situation — that’s when you can go through the list and narrow it and start talking to people.”
Example: When Davidson fired Scott Howson back in February 2013, he already knew where he was headed. The Blue Jackets, he believed, needed to focus heavily on the draft, so Kekäläinen (whom Davidson knew well from their time together in St. Louis) was the obvious candidate.
It’s not as if the Blue Jackets no longer need a talented amateur evaluator; every NHL club does. But what’s imperative at present is team-building and roster construction, sorting through the collection of young talent to find the right fit.
“There’s been considerable interest, and that’s great to see,” Davidson said. “We’ve got a big week ahead with the trade deadline. That needs to take most of our energy now, and it is. But once that passes, finding the right GM will be the focus.”