SettlementRichie10
Registered User
- May 6, 2012
- 10,238
- 8,519
To me these are outsized expectations. A 1st and decent prospect for Carter? Lombardi didn't give that much to get him 6 years ago. They'll be lucky to get a 1st and whatever the equivalent of Johnson would be. Kovalchuk has a 35+ contract. He's not exactly an asset, and especially not just for picks. Toffoli, in a speed league, is going to get a 1st and another decent prospect? Ok.
The Kings have not been in a position to facilitate the tank since the day Quick signed his retirement contract. Lombardi stupidly tried to take advantage of the pre-2013 contract rules, and now nobody is going to need an aging and injury prone goalie, at a $6m cap hit, until 2023.
Johnson in 2012 had astronomically more value than your run of the mill prospect. Are you joking?
A 1st and a top four PMD >>>>> A 1st and a prospect. Stop it.
Again, I’m not talking a Cody Glass tier prospect. I’m talking about the Mckeowns and Zykovs of the world.
Edit: Toffoli had three seasons with 20 or more goals. If Tatar can fetch as much as he did last year, Toffoli can get as much or more.
I understand people are upset with these players right now, but you’re criminally undervaluing the assets we DO have. Adding a Jeff Carter or Tyler Toffoli for picks/prospects is exactly what contending teams are looking to do. Hell, that’s what we did in 2014 with Gaborik. Contenders are willing to take chances and give up assets for these players. It happens every. Single. Year.
No, we’re not going to be landing a Nylander, but these players DO have value. You’re drowning in your own cynicism if you think we can’t unload some of these guys for picks/prospects to facilitate a tank.
The only immovable contracts we have are Kopitar, Brown, Quick, and Phaneuf. Everyone else holds trade value if the price is right.
Last edited: