Grate n Colorful Oz
The Hutson Hawk
Mb is paid about 90 percent more than he is worth.
You're getting soft, brother
Mb is paid about 90 percent more than he is worth.
This is what i believe too , and to add to what you said … Remember a few days ago the rumour of Vincent Damphousse being the next president ?
I think it was Rejean Tremblay who got the "scoop" , I think he said that Molson was in favor of a president but Bergevin is/was able to convice Molson that he doesnt need someone between him and the Boss. From what i remember Molson bought what Bergevin sold and put the idea of a president on hold.
If Gallagher wants 7-8 years i would hesitate a lot. His kind of players often slow down early in their 30ies. 7 years would put him at 35 the last season and 8 years at 36. Unless it's not 6+ millions not sure i would sign that.
You guys ever seen an interview by an owner where he expresses non-confidence in his GM?
Not sure why this is newsworthy...
he obviously has confidence in Bergevin
At some point this season I hoped that the fans would just stop going to the games. Under 12'000 out of 21'000 would be a strong statement that the fans arent ok with all that BS. But for some reasons the Habs are such a prestigious franchise that if you ever get the chance to go in the Centre Bell for the experience, you just go.
boo'ing Marc Bergevin in front of cameras would be another good chance to show our displeasure but he will never expose himself to that risk.
A solution would be to Chant " OUR GM SUCKS " in a game, non stop for 4-5games straight until something happens. But I doubt that everyone will tag along or get the heads up to do so.
Anyhoo, when is marc's contract due ?
This is what, the 3rd time he's had to reaffirm his confidence in MB in the last few years? I think that he's had to do this so often says it all as far as the job MB has done with the team. You can blame it on the frantic market or rumors but fact remains, our lack of playoff action is a major negative on his resume.You guys ever seen an interview by an owner where he expresses non-confidence in his GM?
Not sure why this is newsworthy...
he obviously has confidence in Bergevin
Be that as it may...I'm not sure what the story is here.This is what, the 3rd time he's had to reaffirm his confidence in MB in the last few years? I think that he's had to do this so often says it all as far as the job MB has done with the team. You can blame it on the frantic market or rumors but fact remains, our lack of playoff action is a major negative on his resume.
Can you substanciate this? I read the collumn and I don't remember him saying that last part. Did he say it on the radio show? (91.9 or 98.5?)
I don't buy this. Molson doesn't need someone in between because Bergevin is his spokesperson. I don't buy that Bergevin convinces Molson of anything. Molson keeps him there because it's just too much trouble hiring another charismatic french yes man. Those who think Bergevin is some machiavellian genius who manipulates Molson are out for lunch. The furthest Bergevin is of that mold, is a smoocher/asskisser. No way he's intelligent enough to plan a manipulative/cohersive/persuasion plan. He's a f***ing moron who doesn't have an inkling how to plan.
What did Engels say?
1. That it was telling that Molson started his conference call concerned about justifying the hierarchy instead of making changes to it.
2. Molson spoke of his merits as a president and businessman when he was asked if the Damphousse rumor was a direct criticism of his work as a hockey executive. Engels said that if those merits were obvious to fans, he wouldn't have needed to mention them.
3. That if the team hadn't trended backwards again after the 96 points season in '19, he wouldn't appear myopic by betting on himself and Bergevin again.
4. The last sentence is a subtle jab at the consistent Canadiens tradition of always pushing the window ahead as to when this team will finally contend.
He did all this without sounding like a columnist with a schtick like Kelly.
So we are not arguing the accuracy of Kelly's statements... just don't like the delivery? I rarely if ever read the gazette anymore... ever since the killed the HIO... but I am yet to find anything that Kelly says about Molson, Bergevin and their minions wrong.
Todd is a hack. Kelly is just a disgruntled fan, like us.He's often hyperbolic to the extreme and with the delivery of a tabloid rag. Just awful, artless stuff. He's in Jack Todd's tier.
Todd is a hack. Kelly is just a disgruntled fan, like us.
1. That it was telling that Molson started his conference call concerned about justifying the hierarchy instead of making changes to it.
2. Molson spoke of his merits as a president and businessman when he was asked if the Damphousse rumor was a direct criticism of his work as a hockey executive. Engels said that if those merits were obvious to fans, he wouldn't have needed to mention them.
3. That if the team hadn't trended backwards again after the 96 points season in '19, he wouldn't appear myopic by betting on himself and Bergevin again.
4. The last sentence is a subtle jab at the consistent Canadiens tradition of always pushing the window ahead as to when this team will finally contend.
He did all this without sounding like a columnist with a schtick like Kelly.
Yeah, I know. I really don't give a fukk anymore, I like coming here and talking to all of you guys but in all honesty, I have lost my desire to cheer for what Bergevin has built. I will have hope again but not until the MB era ends.You're getting soft, brother
Wow, Engels woke up and realized that he was a journalist and not MB's butt plug. Impressive.1. That it was telling that Molson started his conference call concerned about justifying the hierarchy instead of making changes to it.
2. Molson spoke of his merits as a president and businessman when he was asked if the Damphousse rumor was a direct criticism of his work as a hockey executive. Engels said that if those merits were obvious to fans, he wouldn't have needed to mention them.
3. That if the team hadn't trended backwards again after the 96 points season in '19, he wouldn't appear myopic by betting on himself and Bergevin again.
4. The last sentence is a subtle jab at the consistent Canadiens tradition of always pushing the window ahead as to when this team will finally contend.
He did all this without sounding like a columnist with a schtick like Kelly.
He was so fast to fire Pierre Gauthier and was saying all the right things.
https://www.cbc.ca/sports/hockey/nhl/canadiens-fire-gm-gauthier-part-ways-with-gainey-1.1154664
Why can’t he do the same with Bergevin?