GDT: GDT #14 New York Islanders @ Ottawa Senators | November 7th | 7:00 PM | F/W 4-2

Rehabguy

In ROY I trust
Oct 2, 2011
5,174
2,006
It certainly seems like the new first line is playing well, so might as well keep them together. But to use their temporary three-game success against weak opponents to suggest the team is better without Barzal is bizarre. The Oilers have won a few games without McDavid, Kings without Doughty, and the Leafs without Matthews, I guess that means those teams are better without their best players too?
If there's a Barzal trade that makes the team better, who wouldn't be for it, but trying to force a trade because people think the team is better without him is a poor way to build a strong team.
Assuming the first line continues to find success, it makes sense to try Barzal centering Duclair as a line 3 to see how it works out.
Was just going to write the same thing. So bizarre. How long did it take them to build a team around Crosby and McDavid. Barzal is neither of those but he's the best we got so why the heck would anyone think of trading him? As Leeroggy pointed out nothing wrong with being open about such possibilities but unless you are certain of getting a Turgeon for a LaFontaine you stay put or risk getting a Kirk Muller for a Turgeon which is more likely the situation. The only types of players we would get are players unhappy with their contract situation or locker room cancer. Those type players as skilled as they may be don't help this team. Barzal is happy playing for the Islanders and without Trotz/Lambert there to stymie his game he looks to be a perennial 80+ point player. He shouldn't be going anywhere.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chockey22 and mm11

doublechili

For all intensive purposes, your nuts
Apr 11, 2006
19,000
15,474
Assuming the first line continues to find success, it makes sense to try Barzal centering Duclair as a line 3 to see how it works out.
Duclair - Barzal - Holmstrom seems like it might be a complimentary combo. And we're saying "3C", but if those were Barzal's line mates the team would really have 3 pretty equal lines. Just give the extra ice time to the line that's hot at any given time.
 

impaaaaaact

Registered User
Jan 14, 2014
2,096
1,813
Brooklyn, NY
Hutton
So having Barzal in the line up is a liability. Is that the new take?

Quite possibly our top points getter and a pivotal player come any playoff season when this team had some success in the playoffs and we want to trade the guy.

You want to know why we never have any good players? Because we frigging trade them!

Leddy, Eberle, Toews, now you want to trade Barzal?

What the F is wrong with everybody?

An unleashed Barzal gets 80 points last season +30 points playing hockey the right way and we want to let him go? The problem for Barzal was the systems he was required to play under the past 6 years not his ability. Under Roy him and the rest of the team will be fine performing up to their full potential.
yep, gotta trade Barzal because we beat the senators, penguins, and sabres lmao. could have lost any one of those games but we didn't and now it's time to part with our most dynamic player
 

impaaaaaact

Registered User
Jan 14, 2014
2,096
1,813
Brooklyn, NY
Duclair - Barzal - Holmstrom seems like it might be a complimentary combo. And we're saying "3C", but if those were Barzal's line mates the team would really have 3 pretty equal lines. Just give the extra ice time to the line that's hot at any given time.
The issue there is that no one can take face-offs. I honestly don't hate playing Maclean with them... he was great as a winger last season, can take most of the draws which he is apparently incredible at now, can keep up with those two in terms of foot speed about as well as anyone else, and should be pretty sound defensively. Keep Engvall-Casey-Holmstrom together, that's a totally fine fourth line
 
  • Like
Reactions: doublechili

Throttle

Registered User
Sep 22, 2020
6,026
4,496
Hutton

yep, gotta trade Barzal because we beat the senators, penguins, and sabres lmao. could have lost any one of those games but we didn't and now it's time to part with our most dynamic player
But ya didn’t breat lowly Anaheim and Columbus with him…so, yeah, there’s something there.

Dynamic has equated to not much of anything, but everyone else is to blame for it.

In 2022, the Isles went 14-7-2 without Barzal to make the playoffs. Know what their record was when he returned?

In 2024, the lowly Isles are 3-1 without Barzal … so far.
 
Last edited:

Rehabguy

In ROY I trust
Oct 2, 2011
5,174
2,006
But ya didn’t breat lowly Anaheim and Columbus with him…so, yeah, there’s something there.

Dynamic has equated to not much of anything, but everyone else is to blame for it.

In 2022, the Isles went 14-7-2 without Barzal to make the playoffs. Know what their record was when he returned?

In 2024, the lowly Isles are 3-1 without Barzal … so far.
By the end of last year the Islanders had a much better record without Sorokin between the pipes and it was Varly who got us in the playoffs. Do you suggest we trade him too?

The tops playoff performers the past 6 post seasons:

Barzal 45 points
Nelson 43 points

Pageau 27 points
Palmieri 26 points
Lee 21 points
Horvat 5 points

Yeah, let's trade him. Top points getter for the Isles in the regular and post-season. Beyond ridiculous.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: impaaaaaact

Throttle

Registered User
Sep 22, 2020
6,026
4,496
By the end of last year the Islanders had a much better record without Sorokin between the pipes at it was Varly who got us in the playoffs. Do you suggest we trade him too?
Nope, but that’s because your logic is faulty. He could have been a problem contract going forward, IF he didn’t recover and it looks like his injury impacted his play.

The Isles have 8 seasons of Barzal to know what you have and how it’s working out. Paying $9M to a center that can’t take faceoffs (a critical role of being a center) and the team plays .750 without you…that’s not so ‘special’ of a player.
 

Rehabguy

In ROY I trust
Oct 2, 2011
5,174
2,006
Nope, but that’s because your logic is faulty. He could have been a problem contract going forward, IF he didn’t recover and it looks like his injury impacted his play.

The Isles have 8 seasons of Barzal to know what you have and how it’s working out. Paying $9M to a center that can’t take faceoffs (a critical role of being a center) and the team plays .750 without you…that’s not so ‘special’ of a player.
6 of those seasons were under a defense above all things coach. The statistic you really need to look at is:

Barzal under under Trotz/Lambert: averages 45 points a season
Barzal under any other coach: averages 80 points a season

Trotz was a horrible coach to play under for an offensive minded player. Absolutely horrible. He nearly ruined Barzal's career. Probably ruined Wahlstroms. Forget Ho-Sang he didn't even get a shot.

Look I get it. Two ECF's is fun to watch but its not a Stanley Cup, nor is it even making the championship finals. Thinking that's some sort of success is a loser mentality. As Roy would sarcastically say, "Oh you made the ECF, big cheer". I'll give him some points and respect for getting the team that far but it was at TOO much of a cost for this team psyche and Roy is working and night and day to reverse the damage that was done. The team has to learn how to play simple hockey again and most importantly how to go on the offense again. It's a game of scoring points. Its a game of skating and moving forwards NOT backwards! You watch his drills and that's what he's doing. It's all about skating and attacking.

And I absolutely love the move he made in bringing up Isaiah George. He brings up a 20 year old kid unstymied by backwards coaching- the only player who was not coached at all under the Trotz/Lambert and he makes him a model for the rest of the team to watch by given lots of minutes even critical minutes. He says, look, here's a kid who keeps just takes off as soon as he has the puck in his possession and is not afraid to take chances. He uses his natural instincts and athleticism to make things happen. Roy is just brilliant. Just watch this kid and see how simple the game can be. Just move your damn feet and head towards the net.

The problem with this team was coaching, not the players. It's a team sport. The team is guided by a system. They were clearly playing under a system that completely hobbled each individual's natural scoring instincts. Under Roy this mindset will change. He needs to change the mindset of this team. Retreating and playing on our heels because we think we are not good enough to compete is a loser mentality but that is what Trotz said this team was. He said the defense was not as bad as they thought it was and the offense was not as good as they thought it was so we are going to sit back and retreat as soon as we get a small lead then hang on for dear life. It was too much of a loser mentality and they got hammered with this mentality for 6 years.

The team has to believe in itself. It will just take a little more time, but they will make the playoffs and who knows where they go from there. Roy thinks like a champion because he IS a champion and has personally led those teams to win MANY championships. I trust this guy. Accepting 2 ECF as some form success is a loser mentality. We should expect more from this team as I am sure Roy is thinking the same.

You watch this video and you will understand how a champion thinks:

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: leeroggy

impaaaaaact

Registered User
Jan 14, 2014
2,096
1,813
Brooklyn, NY
But ya didn’t breat lowly Anaheim and Columbus with him…so, yeah, there’s something there.

Dynamic has equated to not much of anything, but everyone else is to blame for it.

In 2022, the Isles went 14-7-2 without Barzal to make the playoffs. Know what their record was when he returned?

In 2024, the lowly Isles are 3-1 without Barzal … so far.
You still haven’t responded to my question of how Barzal could lower the rest of the team’s shooting percentage, even when he’s off the ice. They were shooting 6% with him in, 10+ with him out… as a team, cumulatively.

Any further analysis besides Barzal = Bad?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Levi Walking Bear

Strummergas

Regular User
Sep 3, 2006
15,518
6,268
Queens, NY
You trade any player to make the team better, even if you have to cry yourself to sleep the night of the deal. Barzal is not necessarily the primary reason this team ails at times, but he's also not able singlehandedly carry them to victory either. Therefore, if the right deal presents itself, you pack his (or anyone's) bags and wish him well.

I'd have no problem moving any player on this roster not named Sorokin at this point.And depending on the return, he could go too. It just doesn't seem like it would be worth it though.
 
Last edited:

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad