It was a backhanded compliment. You basically said "yea it's good, but anyone with the same draft picks as the isles would of done just as well or better." And then went even further to compare them to your rangers, almost as a way to try and validate for yourself that the rangers are still better then the Isles when no one even mentioned the rangers until you did. You make it seem that if the Rangers had the same draft picks as the Isles that they would of done just as well or better at drafting then the Isles, meanwhile I believe that not true when your team drafts someone like McIlrath over Fowler.
Never ever once did I say the Rangers drafting was better than the Islanders, I'm saying the opposite. This is the second time you're either putting words in my mouth, or just completely misreading the post that you are quoting. Unless you're counting that part in my first post where I say that Duclair has played 10 more games than Reinhart, because that was very obviously tongue in cheek. At least to me. I suppose I should've put a
smiley in there.
But yes, I did imply that because the Islanders have had the 'good fortune' of having high picks, that there are many GMs around the league who would have had similar success to Garth picking in those spots.
I only compared them to the Rangers because I am a Rangers fan, and it is pretty common for fans of one team to compare THEIR team to another team in question, as it is what they know most and care most about.
If you'd like, I can do a comparison with another team that isn't the Rangers. Just let me know what team you'd like me to do. I'll do the same comparison one day over my holiday break from work. To not derail the thread, I can even PM it to you. Just let me know.
Why are you comparing them to the Rangers? Why not compare them to teams that have been around the same drafting range as them over the time in question? By your logic, it's "so easy", that all of those teams should have similar prospect pools. Care to do that analysis?
Not only has Snow done a good job drafting in the early rounds as well as a few steals in the later rounds, but he has also drafted players that complement each other well. He's mixing and matching PBA and need, and he's doing it quite well. Strome and Nelson are a dynamic pair. Reinhart and Pulock complement each other very well. Hamonic and de Haan look like a pairing for a long time. MDC slots right next to Tavares.
He's done a good job. The whole "he's had easy picks" rhetoric couldn't be more armchair GM. It's all so easy from your recliner.
See above and let me know which team you'd like.
It's telling that I'm not the only one in this thread arguing what I'm arguing, and that it's not only Rangers fans doing so.
I'm not trying to armchair GM. I've said that Garth has done a good job. I've admitted that the people in the draft room have forgotten more about hockey than I'll never know (though that was when I was discussing the Rangers, but I meant it to apply to all teams).
Is it so terrible for me to say that while Garth has been good at drafting recently, it's not this amazingly impressive feat because of where his team has been picking in the draft order? Is that really so bad to say?
EDIT - Oh lookie here! Let's take a look at something I just noticed...
Post #41 in this thread:
Lol, typical hate post from a rangers fan. I really dont mind the Rangers team at all but their fans make it hard for me to like them. As a rangers fan, you have no business saying a team's drafting sucks. Let's compare the Islanders drafting to the Rangers drafting. How's McIlrath doing for you guys?
My reply to this post, post #43 in this thread. It's very a long winded comparison of the Rangers and Islanders, as prompted, so I'll save everyone the scrolling and another long quote. You can follow the link in the quote box.
And a reply to my post #43, in post #45:
It was a backhanded compliment. You basically said "yea it's good, but anyone with the same draft picks as the isles would of done just as well or better." And then went even further to compare them to your rangers, almost as a way to try and validate for yourself that the rangers are still better then the Isles when no one even mentioned the rangers until you did. You make it seem that if the Rangers had the same draft picks as the Isles that they would of done just as well or better at drafting then the Isles, meanwhile I believe that not true when your team drafts someone like McIlrath over Fowler.
And then another reply to #43 here in post #46
Why are you comparing them to the Rangers?
So, joemon999, no one brought up the Rangers? Dude, you did.
13th Floor - that's why I compared them to the Rangers.