gojetsgo
Registered User
- Nov 1, 2015
- 11,189
- 31,506
now you are just taking a totally different rule to try to say it should count....
Post-Game Talk: Garbage Refs can't stop the Jets, 5-4 winners in OT
- Thread starter bustamente
- Start date
- Status
The Blue Baron
Registered User
Don’t avoid the question. Clearly you don’t give a rats ass or are just ignorant to it.
oldunclehue
Registered User
- Jun 16, 2010
- 1,254
- 1,367
Ah yes....ban me for having the same view of the play as the refs (who are professionals making $200,000 plus in the NHL) as well as the experts in the situation room that reviewed the play.
gojetsgo
Registered User
- Nov 1, 2015
- 11,189
- 31,506
you quoted an entirely different rule lol....
- Jun 10, 2014
- 58,957
- 31,469
He was not safe as soon as he got back on his feet and tried to play. That's why he didn't do that. Mask off, play stops.
- Dec 29, 2016
- 7,718
- 14,077
If you think there was anything "safety" related to that call, you might want to try explaining it - because there was nothing Safe about that call regardless of what the governing body might have written.
Sometimes, as a fan, you need to think outside the box
oldunclehue
Registered User
- Jun 16, 2010
- 1,254
- 1,367
It's the same rule in the NHL....I was posting it as he accused me of not caring for player safety....when clearly Hockey Canada...the governing body of HOCKEY in our country's has the same view.
AlaskaJet
Retrieves pucks and ducks
Why would any Manitoban cheer for the Rangers? Or hate Wpg? The poor guy.
Sure we’ve all had our share of hockey disappointments but you don’t throw out the baby with the bath water..
Classic troll, not even a good Sasquatch..
gojetsgo
Registered User
- Nov 1, 2015
- 11,189
- 31,506
that rule has zero to do with the play... either you are trolling or just incredibly...
bustamente
Fraud Supporter
Anyways getting back to the game I thought that the new D pairings played well and should continue but holy hell the Jets protecting a lead late in the game has become an adventure of epic proportions, need to really work on this and stop giving away leads.
Guardian17
Strong & Free
Yeah take your own advice move on. Also quoting hockey Canada the party in trouble for turning a blind eye to inappropriate coaches.
oldunclehue
Registered User
- Jun 16, 2010
- 1,254
- 1,367
Explain to me how this rule has nothing to do with the play?
1. Player was on ice injured (the NHL rulebook does not distinguish this in rulebook as Skater or goalie, simply as PLAYER)
2. The helmet came off. we do not know if the refs saw that at this time, but clearly the rule states if the opposing team has possession of the puck and an immediate scoring chance, then the play continues.
3. With Helle down, the Stars have control of the puck, the player puts the puck infront of the net....thats a scoring chance. the nets WIDE open.
4. Morrissey pushing Benn into the goalie is cause of the whole issue.
THE ONLY ISSUE I HAVE IS DEFINITION of immediate....who decided that? The refs and situation room did on this one and decided it fit the bill.
How am I trolling? Because I don't agree with the Jets fans here? I don't get why thats trolling...
Definition of troll:
In slang, a troll is a person who posts or makes inflammatory, insincere, digressive, extraneous, or off-topic messages online.
gojetsgo
Registered User
- Nov 1, 2015
- 11,189
- 31,506
because the rule you posted was about an injured player... not the rule about his helmet coming off....
tbcwpg
Moderator
- Jan 25, 2011
- 16,685
- 20,172
It was probably the right call on the goal based on the possession/goal scoring opportunity factor as the rule is written. The issue is the rule is dumb.
No more games against Dallas this season so winning the season series is a good thing there.
No more games against Dallas this season so winning the season series is a good thing there.
The prediction contest for the game against the Chicago Blackhawks is now open and ready for your guesses.
Congratulations to @Peachkings1922 for getting all three predictions right and was awarded eight points! Way to go! This is the second time this year that someone has gotten the trifecta, keep it up!
Don't forget to sign up to create a GDT! They are fun and you can be as creative as you would like. There are plenty of games still available, so check it out...
Congratulations to @Peachkings1922 for getting all three predictions right and was awarded eight points! Way to go! This is the second time this year that someone has gotten the trifecta, keep it up!
Don't forget to sign up to create a GDT! They are fun and you can be as creative as you would like. There are plenty of games still available, so check it out...
bustamente
Fraud Supporter
Big picture the Jets are in 2nd place 3 points out of first with 2 games in hand, winning in Chicago is mandatory.
oldunclehue
Registered User
- Jun 16, 2010
- 1,254
- 1,367
But the rulebook says that if the helmet comes off and the puck is in the opposing teams possession and an immediate scoring chance is there....they don't blow it.
Again....the debate should be about who decided it was immediate. I'd say it was in my mind because it was quick from back of the net to Robertson and in the net. The NHL agreed with that as well and counted it.
The RULE is clear on the helmet coming off.....where you don't agree is whether or not this was an immediate scoring chance. The NHL decided it was. So why is that an issue?
There is no rule on if a goalie is at RISK of an injury based around this rule. Quote me anywhere in the rulebook that shows the play should be blown dead based on RISK of an injury...
Rule 9.6 of the NHL rulebook:
“When a goalkeeper has lost his helmet and/or face mask and his team has possession of the puck, the play shall be stopped immediately to allow the goalkeeper the opportunity to regain his helmet and/or face mask. When the opposing team has possession of the puck, play shall only be stopped if there is no immediate and impending scoring opportunity. This stoppage of play must be made by the Referee. When play is stopped because the goalkeeper has lost his helmet and/or face mask, the ensuing face-off shall take place at one of the defending team’s end zone face-off spots."
Immediate or IMPENDING..... definition: (of an event regarded as threatening or significant) about to happen; forthcoming.
So is 3-4 seconds after the helmet off "about to happen, or forthcoming"
Duke749
Savannah Ghost Pirates
f*** the Stars.
f*** those refs.
Love you Morrissey.
f*** those refs.
Love you Morrissey.
Someone go to the New York board next time they don’t like a call even if “it’s in the rule book”.
bustamente
Fraud Supporter
I don't care if Helle masks is off or on I care that he is flat out face down on the ice not moving and the refs decided to let the play go on, player safety my ass, league will come out with some bs mish mosh like they usually do
sipowicz
The thrill is gone
- Mar 16, 2011
- 32,260
- 43,251
Long week, fell asleep somewhere near the end of the second, what did I miss?
- Jun 10, 2014
- 58,957
- 31,469
Jets did not play very good that game. Thanks Helle.
Well there is one statistical analysis that isn't worth s**t.
- Status
Ad
Upcoming events
-
Grey Cup 111TH GREY CUP - Toronto Argonauts vs Winnipeg Blue Bombers - Vancouver - TSN, CBS Sports NetworkWagers: 16Staked: $108,330.00Event closes- Updated:
-
