bur and 666 others
Registered User
- Jun 13, 2012
- 1,962
- 795
Got any fantasy comparable player in mind?
Only watched the 3rd period. Someone care to explain why Mitchell played more than MacKinnon and only 7 seconds less than Soderberg? I'm very happy with the win but playing Mitchell playing more than MacKinnon isn't the recipe for winning.
Really? I believe Buffalo absolutely screwed him up and his development and I look at this as his rookie season. He was scratched, demoted and had to earn his ice time and he's worked very hard. His puck skills are great, his IQ and understanding of the game are top notch and he's actually decent defensively. If he can work on his skating and engage more, he can absolutely be a top 6 player and a dangerous at that.
That is a bad hockey team in Arizona. If OEL is out for a while, they might plummet in the standings.
Someone has to play the 3rd line. This happens every time the argument comes up that they can roll 3 scoring lines evenly. No they can't, one will always take a backseat. They only had one PP and MacKinnon wasn't out for it, there were several PKs.
They played the same amount even strength and Arizona only had 3 PP's, hardly several. Mitchell is on the 4th line, keep him there. He shouldn't be playing more than he's capable of.
So happy to see the guys play with urgency. Pretty good overall game tonight. Finally they didn't play the third like they know they're going to lose. We need to keep the urgency up!!
Only watched the 3rd period. Someone care to explain why Mitchell played more than MacKinnon and only 7 seconds less than Soderberg? I'm very happy with the win but playing Mitchell playing more than MacKinnon isn't the recipe for winning.
How did a post about Capitals/Ducks game get in hereThat was great passing between Kuzy and Bura
3 is several
I'm not denying his talent and like I said I'm absolutely in his corner so I believe in him. But that engagement is part of it, he can get better at it but part of it is who he is. He looks good on those lines with good players and he helps them but he won't be driving the line. I don't think people would be happy if he was our only solution at top 6 wing next year. I'd like him as a luxury on a third scoring line and someone who can easily play on a top line.
So an average of 1 PK per period is several?
Given the way you used the term in your sentence and in relation to Mitchell playing more than MacKinnon and as much as Soderberg, yes, we are.
It's splitting hairs. We know they use Mitchell more in defensive situations. Part of it is the 2 minutes on the PK and part of it is a couple extra defensive shifts. I'm not saying I love the idea of him playing more than MacKinnon. I'm just saying when MacKinnon, Duchene and Landy are on 3 different lines one of them is just going to get less minutes. For a bit lately it's been Duchene's line. Roy must have thought they were going tonight so they got the most 5 on 5 time. We know the Soderberg line never really is the 3rd line even if it is on paper. So one of the lines has to suffer. Tonight they were leading so Roy got to roll as close to 4 lines as possible too. Sure it's a little surprising MacKinnon didn't have a lot of time but it's for the reasons I just said plus not getting a pp shift.
Just watched the Anaheim game. We're going to have to play damn near perfect on Wednesday...