Mrb1p
PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Yeah. Im running out of argument.Caulfield a complete no show
If he sucks for the first 5-10 games next year I want his ass traded.
Yeah. Im running out of argument.Caulfield a complete no show
Why do they always say Roy's first and last name? There is no other Roy in the game.
That line is invisible tonightI thought Suzuki and Slaf were having decent showings. Slaf post early hurts.
He is much better than Mete but that ain't saying much. He is a fillerWhen I watch Harris I see Victor Mete.
Why do they always say Roy's first and last name? There is no other Roy in the game.
That goes for the entire first line tonight
IQ difference.Roy gets a breakaway with 'skating concerns'
And Slaf who skates like a gazelle, I have never seen on a breakaway lol
I'm not sure if he will remain in the NHL for much longer. He doesn't do anything.He is much better than Mete but that ain't saying much. He is a filler
He isn't #1-2 marerial though. If we don't address that we ain't going anywhere and we can't wait 3-4 years for development IMO. I'm hoping KH finds a solid young D that can play that role in a tradeHe’ll be on the first pairing next year. Won’t surprise me if we deal him at next year’s deadline though.
Btw, had a pretty good game tonight.
the lower goals total is disappointing, but adapting and finding his playmaking game is a positive imo.Let the Caufield fanboys continue to pretend that he's having a good season!
I mean youre also a Mathopologist, so youre no better.Let the Caufield fanboys continue to pretend that he's having a good season!
Did you not read my post? I’m only talking about offence Jesus Christ have another beer lol. Matheson is a stud in the O zone but a complete idiot when he over handles the puck. His power play production alone makes him worth every penny and he’s probably a discountAdvanced stats? Its literal normal stats.
Guhle is a disappointment but produces more than Matheson at 5v5, whos an offensive star??? What? Theres no logic to your opinion, all you see is the DB point column and call him an offensive star.
They’ve also made bad plays. Suzuki turned it over three times on the last PP. Give Edmonton credit, they are pressuring us and not giving us any room.That is so not true. Slaf and Nick made quite a few good plays in either end.
Gotta wash down the pain with a $55 12-ounce beer in a plastic cup.My boy is
I don't really care about playmaking if it comes at the cost of goalscoring. He's getting paid 8 million to be a lethal sniper. 40 goals and 65 points is a lot different than 25 goals and 65 points, you can find the latter a lot more easily for cheaper.the lower goals total is disappointing, but adapting and finding his playmaking game is a positive imo.
And he is an offensive star. Is Karlsson a star? Matheson has the same number of points. Whether you can win with a Karlsson/Matheeson type d is the question.Advanced stats? Its literal normal stats.
Guhle is a disappointment but produces more than Matheson at 5v5, whos an offensive star??? What? Theres no logic to your opinion, all you see is the DB point column and call him an offensive star.
Suzukis having a breakout season with Cole on his wing, so is Slaf. Theres one excuse for Cole and its the shoulder, anything else and its just being pathetic.the lower goals total is disappointing, but adapting and finding his playmaking game is a positive imo.
average season for a young player but this team is complete shit with like 5-6 vet anchors dragging everyone down
You’re right, he’s not. He’s a stopgap.KHe isn't #1-2 marerial though. If we don't address that we ain't going anywhere and we can't wait 3-4 years for development IMO. I'm hoping KH finds a solid young D that can play that role in a trade
Karlsson has 5 more points at 5v5 and is having a really disappointing season, so no, not an offensive star, at least not this year.And he is an offensive star. Is Karlsson a star? Matheson has the same number of points. Whether you can win with a Karlsson/Matheeson type d is the question.