will1066
If you score four, you better f'n win the game
- Oct 12, 2008
- 52,576
- 75,878
Inb4 puckluck tells us Boston got blown out by the Isles tonight, and any team can win on a given night
Mika as 1C is even worse.If drury thinks he can get away with lindgren as L1 and win a Cup he’s not a good gm. Because that to me along with 3C are the most glaring issues.
We can’t win a Cup with lindgren in that spot not happening
They banned me one time because my name was 2 minutes for white privilegeShame
Oof. Pass. Media shit show. Like playing the Habs but somehow even more f***in' annoying.what a playoff matchup this would be
I would agree but Trochek is the 1C for all intents and purposes. Lindgren is the bigger hole. Zib is good on PK and can do other things. Lindgren just can't do anything lately (or maybe ever I don't know the numbers). Lindgren and Goodrow, both make us worse right now.Mika as 1C is even worse.
He has 4 3pt games in his last 8
If they played each other in the first round, one of them would have to advance. I'm sure they would do their best to try and mess that up.what a playoff matchup this would be
which is why when you win it's like pure ecstasyOof. Pass. Media shit show. Like playing the Habs but somehow even more f***in' annoying.
....that's pretty edgelordyThey banned me one time because my name was 2 minutes for white privilege
But then Cuylle-Brodz-Rempe feels like a bit of a 'leftover parts' line
Mika as 1C is even worse.
The thought of it terrifies me.what a playoff matchup this would be
Little Jimmy sure does like gwgLooking for a Jimmothy goal this period to do the reverse ranger of every former player scoring on us.
And without his PP cookies? Also, don't look up 3v3, such a thing doesn't happen in the playoffs.Mika is a point per game mstch up center even at his worst.
Rangers’ strength is counter attacks and they stray away from that against run-and-gun teams like Toronto. No thank you.what a playoff matchup this would be
Which makes no sense as it's part of the goalPosts are not on goal.
Thank you, it’s literally part of the goal lolWhich makes no sense as it's part of the goal
It makes perfect sense. A shot on goal is one that would have went in if it wasn’t saved, which a shot on the post is not.Which makes no sense as it's part of the goal