GDT: Game # 53 - 05/03/2021 - Rangers vs Capitals - 7pm - MSG2

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm leaning in the direction of a one year 'prove it' contract for Shesterkin. He'd be an RFA for the final time.

This is ridiculous. He's had a good season and you take one bad game and now all of a sudden he needs a prove it contract. Lundqvist would go months at a time where he can't stop a beach ball. I actually think that Igor gives up fewer bad goals than Lundqvist did.
 
Forgiven as long as they don’t have raisins.

They don’t! They’re just oatmeal, brown sugar, maple, whatever. So good. She makes them pretty thin and they come out mostly crispy with a little chew in the center.
DFA88AD3-EBC2-4FD4-92CB-AB8A567C5487.png
 
Yeah, what happened to him? MSG tried him out like a pair of Dockers chinos at Macy's and promptly shelved him.
For all we know he did well and they’re shortlisting him for a TV position. At least I hope so. Or maybe he offered to fill in for someone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: will1066
We need these next two games. Can't have Cakes joaning like he was this morning.
 
This is ridiculous. He's had a good season and you take one bad game and now all of a sudden he needs a prove it contract. Lundqvist would go months at a time where he can't stop a beach ball. I actually think that Igor gives up fewer bad goals than Lundqvist did.

He's had a good season, I agree, but it's a small sample size.

How many goalies get locked up for 6 years after playing 45 NHL games?

And yes, it took a while for Hank to hit his prime, though he was always above average even early on. But you'll remember, Hank took a one year deal off of his ELC under similar circumstances before he was re-signed long term.

Henrik Lundqvist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SnowblindNYR
To me he’s the best player in a bad bad draft. I’d take in the top 15 for sure. Let him simmer for 4 or 5 years.
Is it a bad draft though? Yes, for top end talent, possibly... but for what we need? It's all you can eat. Limited scouting could give us some gems in the first 3 rounds
 
This is ridiculous. He's had a good season and you take one bad game and now all of a sudden he needs a prove it contract. Lundqvist would go months at a time where he can't stop a beach ball. I actually think that Igor gives up fewer bad goals than Lundqvist did.
Igor has faltered in big games. Since the KHL. If I remember right he was pulled in the playoffs.
 
Is it a bad draft though? Yes, for top end talent, possibly... but for what we need? It's all you can eat. Limited scouting could give us some gems in the first 3 rounds
We have 5 picks in the 3rd and 4th. That’s where well could get some decent value on guys with little scouting, especially the O
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad